Diagnosing Dense Same-Class Attribute Misbinding in Large Vision-Language Models
1mo
- Published
- Collected
Authors
Yuanzhi Xu, Qian Gao, Jun Fan, Guohui Ding, Zhenyu Yang, Yuteng Xiao, Sixue Lin
Categories
Large vision-language models can recognize the objects and attributes in a crowded scene yet assign an attribute to the wrong same-class instance. Generic visual-question-answering accuracy marks the response as wrong, while object-hallucination metrics may regard both the object and attribute as image-supported; neither reveals the transfer. This study formalizes this blind spot as Dense Same-Class Attribute Misbinding (DSCAM) and presents InstaBind-Lite, a controlled benchmark that makes it directly measurable. Its 524 images contain 529 curated groups of 3-6 same-class entities, 1773 boxed instances, ordered neighbors, distinguishable color-like attributes, and four complementary question levels, yielding 9580 deterministically evaluated questions. Unlike existing protocols, source-instance annotations separate unsupported generation and recognition failure from an attribute copied from another visible entity. Binding-specific metrics further quantify transfer frequency, adjacency, ordinal distance, and intervention effects. Across five open-source and two commercial/API models, the open-source systems average 19.84% Misbinding Rate and the API systems 7.55%; these errors are hidden by aggregate accuracy. Among identifiable transfers, 80.70% and 81.51%, respectively, originate from adjacent instances. Localization and instance-first interventions help selected models but are not universal remedies. InstaBind-Lite therefore turns previously undifferentiated wrong answers into source-identifiable failure categories and tests a reliability dimension that conventional benchmarks cannot determine: whether a model knows not only what is visible, but which instance owns each attribute.
overfeed.news indexes and links. We publish a short excerpt — the full article stays at arXiv AI Papers.
More from arXiv AI Papers
Log in to follow this source
Can Language Models Play the Wikipedia Game?
Language models increasingly support or automate information retrieval from document collections too large to index. This task is difficult when it requires specialist linguistic or scientific knowledge. We used the Wikipedia Game to test language models on an analogous information retrieval task. In the game, players must reach a target article using only article links. We compared sentence embedding models and LLMs across five Wikipedia languages and five academic-literature datasets. We construct very large local graphs of Wikipedia pages and of paper citations using OpenAlex and provide code to build and navigate them. This allows the study of language models' navigation capabilities without relying on third-party APIs. We compared the models with human and TF-IDF benchmarks. The Wikipedia Game format enables robust comparisons across techniques, languages, and domains. No model significantly outperformed humans, although the best models (GPT-o3 mini, GPT-4o, QwQ:32B, and DeepSeek-R1:70B) achieved comparable success. Performance and rankings varied across languages and topics, with implications for practitioners utilising these techniques.
Hide and Seek: HIDE Concepts to SEEK explanations for black box models
Interpreting machine learning model predictions is a central challenge, particularly for black-box vision models. Concept-based attribution methods interpret models using human-understandable concepts. Existing concept-based methods can only interpret classification and regression models. They require access to model weights or large concept-annotated datasets, and most methods cannot provide image-level attribution. We propose Hide and Seek (HnS), a new method for concept-level attribution that does not require access to model weights or labeled concept datasets. HnS can interpret a wide range of vision models. Given a concept and image set, HnS retrieves concept-aligned images using a vision-language model, localizes the concept within each image, masks the localized region, and measures attribution from the change in the black-box model's output between the original and masked images. This enables faithful attribution by directly measuring the model's behavior and supporting local attributions. We validated HnS on CelebA and COCO-Stuff. Compared to existing methods, HnS showed better agreement with ground-truth attributions. We demonstrated the applicability of HnS on diverse tasks, including image captioning and satellite image segmentation, where no existing concept attribution method can be used. We provided our anonymous code in the supplementary material.
Constructive Bounds for the Topological Expressivity of Neural Networks
The expressivity of a neural network Φ describes the class of functions that a network can express. The term topological expressivity refers to a family of measures particularly suited to understand binary classification and is often formulated in terms of the Betti numbers of a decision boundary β(Φ^{-1}(0)). Despite its popularity, this measure is not as useful for regression and other problems that do not involve a decision boundary. Instead, we propose to study topological expressivity in terms of the Betti numbers of the output of a neural network β(Φ(X)). We formally prove that a ReLU network with architecture (d,_{k=1}^{d } β_k(3k+2),_{k=1}^{d}β_k(k+1)) can express spaces homotopy equivalent to wedge sums of spheres with arbitrary Betti numbers. This gives upper bounds for any arbitrary connected (β_0=1) sequence of Betti numbers, but by constructing spaces homotopy equivalent to products of N spheres of dimension d_1,...,d_N we achieve much better bounds $(_{n=1} d_n, 3_{n=1}^N d_n + 2N, _{n=1}^N d_n + N) for Betti numbers given by _n (1+x^{d_n})$. Finally we conjecture a much stronger tight bound which gives the architectural bound (d,d+1,d+1) for a space homeomorphic to the sphere.
AI Models Can Provably Hide Arbitrary Capabilities
Capability evaluations aim to surface dangerous model behaviors before deployment, but their reliability depends on the assumption that hidden capabilities can be elicited. We show this assumption does not hold under adversarial conditions by constructing backdoor attacks that embed encrypted neural networks within host model weights, decrypting and executing them only upon receiving a secret trigger. Using digital lockers, these hidden circuits remain provably hard to elicit and interpret under cryptographic assumptions, even given full access to model weights, extending prior work from hiding fixed strings to arbitrary computations. We implement our proof of concept constructions in PyTorch and evaluate elicitation through fine-tuning, weight noising, gradient-based trigger search, and latent adversarial training on a small chemical reaction prediction task - a proxy for CBRN-relevant capabilities. Our results demonstrate resistance to these methods and, together with our cryptographic guarantees, reveal a limit of elicitation-based capability audits. We release our models to support the improvement of defenses.