overfeed.news
Ad

Privum

We build, secure and run your digital infrastructure.

Software, AI systems, penetration testing and secure cloud for companies.

Talk to Privum

Company

OpenAI

2,603documents

81last 7 days

arXiv AI Papers

WeightLoop: Weight-Space Programming with Experimental Feedback

Weight-space programming (WSP) shows that language models can reason about and rewrite neural network weights; recursive self-improvement (RSI) motivates feedback-driven improvement. Models guiding experiments receive concrete feedback: completed assays reveal prediction errors and inform what to test next. We introduce WeightLoop, a framework that turns experimental feedback into persistent updates to deployed predictors. GPT-6 Astra inspects a task specification and the model implementation, then writes a bounded, reusable parameter-editing program. As new measurements arrive, the program identifies prediction discrepancies, validates candidate edits using observed outcomes, and writes the selected changes back to the original model. The editor remains fixed while the predictor evolves, enabling repeated updates without further LLM calls or gradient retraining while preserving the original inference interface. In offline replay, targeted edits improve mean ranking utility in seven of eight endpoint-budget settings (all eight versus random edits) and mean final discovery across three sequential tasks. WeightLoop connects WSP with an RSI-inspired improvement loop, making experimental evidence a direct driver of model change and subsequent decisions.

arXiv AI Papers

How do Transformers Perform Low-Level Control In-Context?

One of the remarkable abilities of Transformer-based neural networks is in-context learning. This motivates us to think about "in-context" control. Can we control a system knowing only (1) that it belongs to a particular family of systems and (2) some data on system evolution (provided as the context trajectory) but no specific parameter information? Specifically, we investigate the ability of Transformer-models to perform "in-context" control of unstable, nonlinear dynamical systems, where context consists only of the unforced system dynamics. We leverage a multi-head, GPT-2-style architecture, and we evaluate performance for two classical nonlinear systems -- the cartpole system and the two-link acrobot system, where the system parameters are unknown to the Transformer. We consider a setting where trajectories from an expert controller are available at training time but not at inference time. Here, we identify training techniques that are essential to train Transformers to perform low-level control. Through an analysis over checkpoints, we show that in-context control is possible, and the learned policy performance generally improves as context increases. Furthermore, the Transformer models can generalize to stabilize systems that are out-of-distribution.

arXiv AI Papers

LLMs Don't Know What They Know: Benchmarking Temporal Self-Knowledge for Financial Backtesting

Financial backtests of large language models (LLMs) are meaningful only if the model did not already know the outcomes it is asked to predict. Practitioners guard against this by trusting a vendor's stated knowledge cutoff, by asking the model what it knows, or by instructing it to answer as of a past date. To verify whether any of these safeguards can be trusted, we introduce FinDendro, a benchmark of 2,226 dated U.S. facts from 1999 to 2026, covering monthly macroeconomic series, month-end stock prices and Federal Reserve decisions. Each fact yields four prompts: a value question, Recall and Predict questions that pair each candidate value with a claim of knowing or guessing without a declared date, and a Predict question with a historical declared date. Controls for persistence and dominant outcomes keep chance accuracy near 0.27. Results show that for most frontier models, self-reports understate knowledge. GPT-5 answers 76% of controlled facts correctly but claims to know 38%, and answers 61% of the facts it says it does not know. Knowledge claims can persist beyond the measured knowledge boundary, by up to seven quarters, and a declared date removes most of the claims of prior knowledge while leaving accuracy unchanged. Backtests inside a model's training window therefore cannot be certified leak-free by self-report, instruction or stated cutoff. These findings motivate behavioral measurement of temporal knowledge boundaries, and FinDendro provides a benchmark and procedure for selecting backtest periods based on demonstrated factual knowledge.

arXiv AI Papers

Smartphone-Aided VR Exergames for HIIT: Gamifying Fitness with Real-Time Pose Estimation

This paper introduces an innovative virtual reality (VR) exergame system designed to gamify High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) workouts through 11 predefined combo moves, including squat-punch combinations, bilateral arm strikes, and diagonal stretch combos. Unlike conventional tracking methods that often rely on wearable motion capture suits or limited headset-based sensors, our system uses a standard smartphone camera placed on a tripod to capture full-body movement. This approach offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative, particularly well-suited to the fast, dynamic motions typical of HIIT routines. The smartphone footage is processed in real time using a pose estimation algorithm, with extracted biomechanical data analyzed by a backend server built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Anthropic's open standard for connecting AI models to structured data sources and tools, and a GPT-4o large language model. The system generates personalized assessments of form accuracy, movement efficiency, exercise intensity, and potential injury risks, tailored specifically to high-impact, time-sensitive exercises. A within-subject study involving 20 participants (ages 18-25) compared experiences in VR and Non-VR HIIT sessions. Results indicated significantly higher enjoyment (Mean = 3.5 vs 2.8, p = 0.02), improved immersion/focus (Mean = 3.2 vs 2.8, p = 0.03), and increased likelihood to recommend (Mean = 3.2 vs 2.7, p = 0.04) under the VR condition. Confidence to continue did not differ significantly between conditions (p = 0.15), while perceived intensity remained comparable. The MCP system showed strong agreement with expert evaluation (87.5%, N = 10 sessions, one certified trainer), supporting its reliability as a feedback tool.

OpenAI — overfeed.news