Assine o Pro, sem anúncios
Faça upgrade para uma leitura sem interrupções e acesso prioritário a novas fontes.
Ver preçosLLM explainers are increasingly attached to autonomous agents as runtime oversight, with operators reading a generated account of the agent's beliefs and actions rather than its internal state. We audit the account itself, pairing an Active Inference (AIF) agent that tracks German grid demand and adjusts generation with an LLM explainer on three backends (GPT-4o, Claude-3-Opus, Gemini), and probing the pair with three black-box triggers. Corrupting the observation stream by 600 MW per step moves the agent's posterior by 490 MW, roughly 0.9% of grid capacity. None of the 30 explanations produced during the injection flag anything under a stated rubric, and each narrates the corrupted belief fluently. On timesteps where the agent takes an objectively wrong action, all three explainers produce a sycophantic rationalization 80-95% of the time (n = 20 per backend). Attacker-controlled text in the observation metadata field steers the explainer, with susceptibility differing by provider and data exfiltration succeeding on all three. We propose mitigations for each failure but do not evaluate them. In every failure we observed, the explanation was fluent and wrong. Moreover, nothing in the explainer architecture checks whether an explanation is true before an operator acts on it. Testing the explainer therefore belongs in any audit of an agentic deployment.
The Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression (DOR) infers a value function from a ranking of reference alternatives in which the Decision Maker (DM) inserts blank cards between consecutive levels to express preference intensity. DOR, and its stochastic extension (SMAA-DOR), treat these answers as hard constraints defining a set of compatible value functions. We propose B-DOR, a probabilistic reformulation of DOR in which each pair of adjacent levels yields an ordinal observation, the declared direction and the number of cards, modelled through a cumulative-link likelihood that relates the number of blank cards to the latent value difference between alternatives. Two Bayesian inference algorithms are proposed: BAYES-DOR samples the whole posterior distribution by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo; FTRL-DOR tracks the maximum a posteriori estimate by constrained convex optimization. Moreover, through a multi-step elicitation process, elicitation can be spread over several short sessions reducing the cognitive burden on the DM. Both algorithms enjoy logarithmic regret bounds for prediction that hold for any sequence of DM responses and that guide the choice of the prior hyperparameters. A Monte Carlo study over 768 configurations shows that accuracy grows with the number of sessions, that blank cards add significant information over preference directions alone, that both algorithms maintain good performance under inconsistent answers, and that both outperform DOR and SMAA-DOR. An illustrative application to Italian regional healthcare performance demonstrates the practical applicability of the approach for building composite indicators.
Meta's Muse is apparently an effective AI assistant, but one that's a little creepy. Part of that is because of its new Mac app, which…
Without buyouts, Flock would "almost certainly" need to lay off staff.
Green's function based operator approximation offers an efficient route for solving linear partial differential equations under varying boundary conditions and source terms. Once the Green's function is learned, solutions for new configurations are obtained through integration rather than by solving the differential equation again. Existing Green's function learning methods face two structural challenges. The first is the singular behavior of the Green's function near the source point, which places a difficult approximation burden on neural networks. The second is the absence of explicit consistency between the learned Green's function and its gradient, although both quantities enter the integral solution representation directly. This work proposes SDC-GON, a Singular Decomposition and Consistency-Regularized Green's Operator Network that addresses both challenges within a unified framework. The Green's function is decomposed into an analytically known singular component and a smooth correction learned by the network, so that the neural approximation targets only the regular part of the response kernel. A self-consistency loss enforces agreement between the gradient and the autodifferentiation gradient of the smooth correction. The method is evaluated on two dimensional Poisson, three dimensional heat conduction, heterogeneous reaction diffusion, and Stokes benchmarks, consistently outperforming the compared baselines across all cases. On the heterogeneous pipe benchmark, SDC-GON achieves a testing error of 3.7010^{-4} with a smaller network architecture, compared with 9.6010^{-4} for the same-width baseline and 4.6310^{-4} for a larger configuration, demonstrating that structural improvements are more effective than increasing model size.
Reasoning language models are trained to produce solutions, not to refuse them, and this bias persists when the problem they are handed is false. Asked to prove a corrupted theorem, a strong model will typically comply and produce a confident derivation of something untrue. We present Euston, an 8B mathematical claim-verification model trained to resist exactly this. Training data were generated with GraphSynth, a probabilistic factor-graph generator that couples attribute-level diversity to decode-time structural masking and span-synchronized verification, yielding 3{,}026 matched true/corrupted statement pairs (6,052 statements) drawn from arXiv papers spanning 2010--2025. We fine-tuned DeepSeek-R1-8B with GRPO under a rule-based, zero-API reward for 189 steps on four H100 GPUs. On a balanced 200-true/200-false held-out split, balanced accuracy rises from 29.50% to 63.75% and the discrimination gap---the difference between the rate of calling false statements false and the rate of calling true statements false moves from -0.5% (z=-0.1) to +27.5% (z=+6.0). Critically, the gain is not purchased with general mathematical ability: AIME 2026 accuracy under official semantics is 65.00% against a 69.17% base, a difference of -4.17% that is not statistically significant, whereas an earlier run of the same recipe on a smaller GraphSynth corpus collapsed to 40.00%. Median response length also falls from 19,217 to 18,296 tokens and the truncation rate from 25.8% to 8.3%, so the improvement does not come from thinking longer. We report the result together with the confounds that bound its interpretation, principally the all-false composition of the official evaluation sets and the low precision implied at realistic error prevalence.
Benchmark scores increasingly influence the development, marketing, and selection of large language models (LLMs). Yet an overall score is interpretable only in relation to the system tested, the questions included, and the conditions of evaluation. This perspective examines five connected limitations of general LLM rankings: differences between evaluated and publicly available systems; commercial incentives and dependencies in external evaluation; benchmark saturation, defective tests, and data contamination; models exploiting scoring procedures; and the limited relevance of general scores to users' tasks. Documented cases illustrate why these problems require different responses. I argue for evaluation procedures that disclose the tested configuration, validate questions and successful task completion, report performance alongside cost and execution time, and make the scope of generalization explicit. I then discuss Isotanta, a crowdsourced benchmarking platform, as a practical example of contributed questions and repeated evaluation. A larger question pool may improve task coverage, while repeated sampling can improve the stability of estimates on that pool; neither guarantees validity or personalization. The paper distinguishes the platform's current shared ranking from proposed task-specific and user-provided evaluations. Its central argument is that model selection requires evidence about performance on the intended work, not simply a high position on a general leaderboard.
Trump claimed, without evidence, that the AI backlash is a Democratic hoax.
Acoustic representation learning is crucial for speech processing, yet low-resource languages (LRLs) face severe data scarcity, limiting the effectiveness of traditional and self-supervised methods. As a promising alternative, in this work, we propose to enhance acoustic representation trough a cross-modal transfer knowledge approach, based on heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs), where acoustic and linguistic entities are modeled as distinct node types within a unified graph. Through message-passing mechanisms, linguistic nodes explicitly transfer knowledge to acoustic nodes, enabling structured and interpretable cross-modal information flow. To highlight this knowledge transfer and its benefits, we measured standard clustering metrics as an intrinsic evaluation of acoustic representation, and to emphasize applicability, we performed isolated-word recognition tasks using an English benchmark and a Cameroonian language dataset in low resources settings . Results demonstrate that acoustic representations consistently benefit from linguistic knowledge propagated through the graph. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of explicit cross-modal knowledge transfer for acoustic representation learning using HGNNs, highlighting a promising direction for speech representation in low-resource settings.
New image-text-to-text model. Tags: deepseek, deepseek-v4.1, deepseek-v4.1-flash, abliterated, uncensored, cybersecurity, moe, fp8
As Large Language Model (LLM) APIs become increasingly integrated into privacy-sensitive workflows, ensuring inference-time privacy without compromising task utility remains a major challenge. Existing approaches preserve most of the original semantic content to maintain downstream performance, but this also leaves exploitable cues for reconstructing the original text. This work investigates semantic decoupling, which replaces original semantics with alternative content while preserving the structure needed for LLM reasoning. Based on this idea, we propose CROSS-MAP, a bidirectional framework that maps private inputs into a different semantic domain before inference and recovers the corresponding outputs afterward. Local models are trained with multi-objective optimization to maximize semantic divergence in the mapping stage while minimizing semantic inconsistency in the recovery stage. Experiments show that CROSS-MAP reduces reconstruction success across multiple attack settings while outperforming existing baselines in utility.
