478
25
Rohit Patel is departing Meta after eight years working on AI evaluations and reinforcement learning, TechCrunch has exclusively learned. His startup, Ndoc, aims to take…
Multimodal transformer models have driven unprecedented performance breakthroughs in modern document understanding. However, the inherent black-box nature of these models remains a major obstacle to their safe deployment in high-stakes sectors. Despite significant progress in explainability for vision and language tasks, explainable AI (XAI) research tailored to multimodal document understanding has received little attention. To address this gap, we present {}, the first comprehensive explainability framework that adapts existing XAI methods and evaluation metrics to the multimodal (text, layout, and image) document understanding context, while introducing efficient multi-target adaptations of both methods and metrics for domain-specific tasks such as semantic entity recognition. Using {}, we systematically evaluate 13 XAI methods across 3 document understanding tasks, 8 datasets, 4 models, and 17 evaluation metrics, and find that only a few methods perform consistently across all evaluation criteria, with Occlusion emerging as the most faithful and interpretable method overall. Through a dedicated meta-evaluation, we observe moderate to strong agreement among several faithfulness and complexity metrics while identifying certain ones that produce unreliable results. Finally, through multiple dataset-wide diagnostic analyses, we uncover key insights into model behavior, including the contribution of individual modalities across tasks and labels, spatial attribution patterns around target entities, and potential dataset biases. Overall, this work serves as both a benchmark and a practical guide for future XAI research in multimodal document understanding. To support reproducibility, we publicly release our code at https://github.com/saifullah3396/docxeval/.
Although the recent development of LLMs has paved the way for multi-modal interaction, minority languages face difficulties keeping pace. This work presents the first open Speech Language Model for Basque, designed for low-latency, end-to-end spoken interaction. Based on the LLaMA-Omni architecture, the system integrates a Latxa model as its backbone, transferring its Basque capabilities to the spoken modality by fine-tuning several modules. To address data scarcity, the English VoiceAssistant-400K corpus was translated into Basque, and the audio was synthesized using a Basque TTS. Evaluation results confirm the system's viability, achieving 3.86/5 in content quality, a 9.94% WER for spoken intelligibility, and a 3.07 UTMOS for audio quality. This work demonstrates that advanced spoken interaction systems can be developed using modular architectures and synthetic data even in low-resource languages.
Controlling the personality of a language model usually relies on written profiles or named trait categories, so it can only express what an author writes down or what a taxonomy names. We instead propose Personality Latents (PL), which learn a latent for each person from their own writing, with no personality labels and no authored profile, and inject it into a frozen language model as a soft prefix. Following generative latent optimization, each training person receives a free latent that is optimized through the frozen model itself, while an encoder learns to predict these latents so that a new person needs only one forward pass, with optional refinement at test time. We evaluate on held-out people by having the conditioned model answer neutral and interview questions and reading personality from its answers with scorers trained on real human writing. On the MBTI axes PL reaches an AUC of , ahead of persona embedding and prompt-based baselines under identical settings, and the ranking holds when the answers are scored in three different embedding spaces. A latent learned with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct also transfers personality to Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct through a new adapter alone.
The RealReal, a secondhand luxury fashion consignment retailer, said it's updating its bot defense system, effectively making it harder for AI agents to shop on…
Multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) addresses agent coordination and objective trade-offs simultaneously while optimising overall system performance. Existing work tends to treat multi-agent cooperation and multi-objective optimisation as largely independent components of a learning problem, which amounts to an exorbitant complexity except in trivial cases. We study here whether the structure provided by multiple objectives can itself be exploited to facilitate cooperation, rather than being treated as an additional optimisation challenge. We formulate MOMARL at both the team and individual levels and introduce objective-wise counterfactual credit assignment to evaluate each agent's contribution across the team objectives. We propose Meta-Gradient Informed Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MIRL), with static (MIRL-S) and dynamic (MIRL-D) variants. By incorporating meta-gradient information, MIRL enables agents to learn how to prioritise objectives individually while collectively optimising the system-level objective, allowing the multi-objective structure to directly guide cooperation. Experiments on a multi-objective multiple particle environment show that our methods improve Pareto-front quality over baselines, with the dynamic variant achieving the strongest performance.
Multi-objective reinforcement learning is a fundamental problem for modern AI, with applications spanning post-training, reasoning models, and robotic control. A central challenge is to learn policies that balance competing objectives, such as helpfulness versus honesty in safety and alignment, or speed versus energy in robotics. The optimal policy can vary sharply with objective-weighting combinations, and the extent of this variation depends crucially on the degree of conflict among objectives, making per-preference policy learning sample-inefficient. In this paper, we introduce objective-conflict coefficients and derive near-optimal regret bounds for online settings using this measure, thereby quantifying the impact of misalignment on learning efficiency. Then, we design routed ensemble policy learning, an algorithm that maintains a small set of basis policies and dynamically routes trajectories to the policy with the highest potential reward. Finally, we consider trajectory selection as another approach to mitigate objective conflict, and design a kernel surrogate trajectory attribution algorithm that estimates how feedback signals from a set of trajectories influence policy learning on other trajectories. The kernel can capture nonlinear interactions such as synergy and antagonism between trajectories. We evaluate our approach across diverse environments and benchmarks: routed ensembles improve average performance by 4.3% over baselines for online environments from Meta-World and MO-Gymnasium, and kernel surrogate attribution improves correlation with leave-one-out analysis over existing baselines by 50%. When applied to trajectory selection, kernel-based attribution yields a 27% improvement in reward over baseline attribution methods.
Conversational QA systems should fix errors when users push back and signal which answers to trust. We split each follow-up into its speech act (re-ask, agree, or challenge) and its payload (an answer string, correct or not), and measure four confidence signals on the same transcripts: verbalized confidence, length-normalized likelihood, a frozen hidden-state probe, and P(True). Answers change when the user supplies an answer string and almost never under the speech act alone: in every retained full-size cell, the correct answer converts at least four times as many wrong answers as re-asking or agreement. The four signals disagree. On Qwen2.5-7B the frozen probe rises with answer persistence rather than truth; this holds on held-out questions, with Llama-3-8B (cleaned answers) as support, but not on four other models. Among 81 Qwen2.5-7B errors that survive one re-ask, re-asking, a fresh chat, or abstain repair almost none, while a gold answer repairs 75-95%. In two preregistered replications, every repair rate without an answer string stays below 0.15; a larger post-hoc rerun excludes 0.15 except for the empty elicit. With BM25 TriviaQA evidence, sentences that contain the answer repair 67-76% of persistent errors versus at most 12% when they do not. An end-to-end contain-gate cuts harm on TriviaQA, but a deployable gate that does not know the gold answer repairs few errors.
Today, I’m talking to Kevin Roose, journalist and author of the new book The AGI Chronicles, which details the recent and explosive transformation of the…
Learning rate decay (LRD) is critical for training high-performance models, yet most designs remain empirically driven. Although the Universal Budget Aware (UBA) LRD offers a theoretical framework, its reliance on SGD dynamics limits its applicability to modern Adam-type optimizers and leaves its key `optimization difficulty parameter' opaque. To bridge this gap, we propose the Universal Training Adaptive (UTA) LRD. Unlike UBA's fixed offline trajectory anchored solely to iterations, UTA treats LRD as a closed-loop shape-and-scale problem. By continuous-time formulation, UTA is training-state adaptive with segment-wise optimal shape. This adaptivity links external iterations with internal training states, enabling a near-optimal path in both progression shape and learning rate (LR) scale, a property unattainable by other LRDs, including UBA. Empirically, we demonstrate consistent improvements across language models (LLaMA 60M to 1B) and vision models (ResNet50, ViT-B) on ImageNet with plug-and-play ease and negligible overhead. Extensive ablation studies further confirm UTA's robustness across dimensions, including peak LR, final decay ratio, its parameter _0, component efficacy and generalization to fine-tuning scenarios, underscoring its practical implementability.
Large language models (LLMs) now serve as the backbone of agents that reason over many turns, call tools, and pursue long-horizon tasks. To avoid recomputation, a model stores the attention keys and values of all past tokens in a key-value (KV) cache. Each layer maintains its own cache, so KV-cache memory can become the main bottleneck for GPU serving. Most compression methods operate within a single layer, by quantizing the cache entries, reducing the channel dimension, or evicting less important tokens. All three lose substantial accuracy at high compression ratios. Cross-layer methods share one compressed cache across adjacent layers to go beyond this limit. However, these methods also degrade sharply at high compression ratios. We find that the KV-cache representations of adjacent layers are quite different, whereas the input hidden states of adjacent layers are highly similar. We also find that, under the same memory budget, reducing the dimension of this shared latent loses far more accuracy than quantizing it. Based on these findings, we propose BellowsKV, a training-free method that maps the hidden states of n adjacent layers to one shared latent per token. At inference time, each layer reads its own keys and values from this latent through a layer-specific projection. We keep the latent at full dimension and compress it in two other ways: BellowsKV-Quant stores the latent at low precision, which is nearly lossless because the latent has no dominant outlier channels; BellowsKV-Evict makes one shared eviction decision per block, because the layers rank token importance very similarly. Across Llama-3.1-8B, Mistral-7B and Qwen2.5-7B, BellowsKV-Quant retains about 99% of full-cache accuracy at 3.6x compression and 97-98% at 13-14x, where the strongest cross-layer method retains at most 84% at 16x. Code: https://github.com/MorrisZJ/BellowsKV
New text-generation model. Tags: llama, text-generation, llm, nanbeige, conversational, en, zh, base_model:Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B-Base
Low-rank SVD-based compression offers a powerful strategy to reduce the computational costs of LLMs. However, existing methods face two key limitations: (i) global rank allocation, where uncalibrated error proxies fail to capture complex error propagation, and (ii) decomposition quality, where Fisher-based estimators suffer from severe rank collapse. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing Layer-wise Error Modeling Search (LEMS) and KFAC-SVD. LEMS advances rank allocation by introducing a layer-wise error surrogate that integrates local and global layer importance alongside a propagation bias, enabling effective global rank allocation via an ILP formulation. KFAC-SVD improves decomposition quality by utilizing token-wise statistics, mitigating the rank deficiency observed in prior Fisher-based SVD approaches. Across Mistral, Qwen3, and Llama 3 model families, we show that LEMS consistently outperforms existing search strategies, delivering significant zero-shot accuracy gains of up to 4.8 p.p. that generalize to model sizes of 70B parameters, while KFAC-SVD achieves an average perplexity improvement of 15%. Project page and code: https://lems-svd.github.io
In LLM-agent opinion simulations, each agent reports the probability that a claim is true after seeing its own previous probability and the probabilities reported by its neighbors, and that number becomes its state in the next round. If the number describes the agent's position rather than the sentence it was shown, then rewriting the claim as its complement and replacing every probability p with 1 - p should return the complementary answer, so the two reports should sum to one. We test this with three small open models: Qwen3-4B, Llama-3.2-3B and Gemma-3-4B. On 2,304 agent states taken from a running network simulation, Qwen's paired reports sum to 1.18 on average, and on 48 real fact-checking claims from AVeriTeC they again exceed one. A controlled benchmark of 24 worlds, each with exactly two possible outcomes, shows the same failure in all three models. The discrepancy is two to ten times larger than the change produced by a same-meaning paraphrase, and it persists under repeated sampling and across peer group sizes and report strengths. When the reports are fed back into two populations that start from complementary states, the populations do not remain mirror images: their divergence is positive after five rounds for every model. Averaging each answer with the complement of its paired answer restores consistency by construction and lowers Brier loss averaged over the two wordings, but at the final round it beats the better of the two original wordings for only one of the three models. A schedule-by-targeting experiment on the same model gives a small, stable interaction because such sweeps keep the claim wording fixed. Consistency under rewording therefore needs its own test before simulated probabilities are read as beliefs
Meta is delaying the enforcement of its new business terms after publishers raised concerns that they could allow the company to scrape news sites for…
Meta has tweaked its business terms to remove language suggesting that it could freely train its AI models on news sites, like The Verge …
Meta has re-enabled Muse sharing after security researchers had reported that public conversation links could be easy to find. The researchers said they had been…
Mark Zuckerberg is barrelling toward a future in which an autonomous network of AI agents will run our lives - shopping for us, working for…
Meta-reinforcement learning aims to train agents that adapt quickly to unseen tasks from limited interaction, but this requires representing task evidence over long interaction histories. Classical recurrent agents compress experience into hidden states, while transformer-based agents retrieve from past trajectories at quadratic memory and computation cost. In this work, we propose Memory-Enhanced Test-Time Adaptation (METTA) for meta-reinforcement learning. It decomposes the fast adaptation phase into two temporal scales: a causal neural memory performs fine-grained within-episode adaptation with linear sequence complexity, while compact episode-level summaries support long-range cross-episode task inference without attending over the full interaction history. Moreover, equipping agents with neural memory provides sufficient expressive capacity and test-time training capability, enabling effective adaptation to unseen held-out tasks and task families at meta-test time. On unseen held-out Meta-World ML10/45 test environments, METTA achieves a success rate over 50\% while maintaining a low training budget and short wall-clock time. On long-context sparse-reward PointMaze tasks, it outperforms transformer-based baselines by exhibiting more structured exploration behavior. These results show that METTA provides an efficient path toward more adaptive and scalable long-context meta-RL.
