Anuncio

NexTalk

Automatiza la primera respuesta. Mantén el toque humano.

Chat en vivo con agentes de IA en tu modelo y tu clave de API, con traspaso a tu equipo.

Empezar gratis

Empresa

Meta

478documentos

25últimos 7 días

Actualizado

arXiv AI Papers

A Theory of Policy Optimization in Post-Training: Coverage Collapse and Reference Resets

Policy optimization is central to language model post-training, yet principled guidance remains limited. We revisit its theoretical foundations to identify algorithms that learn near-optimal policies using total samples and gradient steps governed by the base model's response coverage, a measure of how readily it generates optimal responses. We call such algorithms coverage-preserving. This guarantee captures the goal of amplifying capabilities accessible through sampling from the base model. (1) Coverage collapse. REINFORCE, the basis for PPO and GRPO, can drive the probability of optimal responses to near zero, even as reward improves. This coverage collapse stalls optimization, and convergence can require exponentially many steps despite good initial coverage. The failure arises even with exact gradients and persists under KL regularization to the base model. (2) Reference resets. We show that repeatedly resetting the KL reference to the most recent policy mitigates coverage collapse. We formalize this intervention in Approximate Policy Mirror Descent (APMD), a meta-algorithm that approximately solves a sequence of KL-regularized RL subproblems. APMD enables stronger regularization, making each subproblem easier to solve, while reference resets allow convergence to global optimality. (3) Coverage-preserving algorithms. For softmax linear policies over pretrained features, we use APMD to establish the first global convergence guarantees showing that widely used families of post-training algorithms are coverage-preserving. These include stylized PPO and GRPO variants with explicit KL regularization and reference resets, and squared-loss algorithms that implement them implicitly, including those used to train the Kimi models. These results clarify how regularization, clipping, and objective choice affect the sampling and optimization costs of post-training.

en
arXiv AI Papers

DnNP: Denoising Input Uncertainty in Neural Processes

Neural Processes (NPs) are flexible meta-learning models capable of uncertainty quantification across diverse applications. However, the standard NP framework assumes access to noise-free inputs. This is unrealistic in many practical settings, where sensor noise or measurement errors are unavoidable. This discrepancy between model assumptions and real-world data can significantly degrade prediction quality and uncertainty estimates. We introduce Denoising Neural Processes (DnNPs), a principled extension of the NP framework that explicitly models input uncertainty. We train DnNPs via variational inference. DnNPs jointly learn to denoise corrupted inputs and perform meta-learning, making them robust to noisy training data. We demonstrate DnNPs' effectiveness on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing consistent improvements in prediction and uncertainty quantification compared to standard NPs. On PM2.5 spatial interpolation from real-world air quality sensors, DnNP reduces RMSE by up to 30% and NLL by up to 73% relative to standard NPs. We also provide theoretical grounding: we show that the Bayes-optimal predictor under noisy inputs belongs to the DnNP model class, and that plug-in models with fixed observation variance incur an irreducible KL divergence gap that DnNP provably avoids.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Tailoring Optimization Approaches with Domain Knowledge in Industry Process for Meta-heuristic Development

The paper presents an Industry Process for Meta-heuristic Development (IPMD) schema, a systematic methodology for applying meta- and hyper-heuristic applications to optimization problems. In this context, we present a case study of Balancing Non-dominated Tournament Genetic Programming (BNTGP) applied to solve two NP-hard multi-objective optimization problems: routing (Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows) and scheduling (Multi-Skill Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem). The BNTGP method is based on a metaheuristic design. Its genetic programming-based representation makes BNTGP a hyper-heuristic, as it enables the exploration of a search space of heuristics for solving problems in general. The resulting heuristic can then be applied across a set of problem instances.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Is Persona Generalization Predictable?

Persona generalization occurs when fine-tuning a language model in one domain induces behavioral changes in others -- for example, the broadly unsafe behavior observed in emergent misalignment. We discover a surprising "on-the-line" phenomenon in persona generalization: in-domain and out-of-domain persona rates across various fine-tuning hyperparameters follow an approximately probit-linear relationship, and the specific probit-linear relationship is surprisingly shared even across model families and model sizes, including Qwen and Llama. Training choices that leave the set of trainable parameters unchanged, such as learning rate, weight decay, and training duration, largely move models along the same line, reducing transfer mainly by weakening in-domain learning. Changing which layers are fine-tuned, however, can change the slope. For unsafe behavior, fine-tuning only later layers yields shallower slopes, retaining strong in-domain learning while reducing out-of-domain misalignment. This "on-the-line" phenomenon unifies unexpected, isolated observations of persona generalization within a quantitative framework for predicting and controlling behavioral transfer.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Detecting AI-Authored Text in Authentic Student Writing: Evidence from PISA 2025

AI-text detectors reach near-perfect scores in evaluations that contrast fully human-written texts with texts generated from researcher-designed prompts. In authentic student writing, however, AI use is voluntary and often partial. We study this setting with the PISA 2025 FLA dataset, in which 15-year-olds in Germany wrote English argumentative essays with and without access to a gpt-4o-mini-based chatbot. Keystroke, clipboard and chat logs let us trace every character of the final essay to its origin. From this provenance, we derive text- and sentence-level labels for human-written, AI-generated and mixed text, and for text written after chatbot use without traceable AI material. We evaluate a feature-based detector and a classifier on frozen Llama-3.1-8B embeddings, both adapted from top-ranked shared-task systems. Both separate AI from human text reliably (macro-F1 up to 0.96 for texts and 0.95 for sentences), independently of spelling errors. The feature-based detector, however, relies on lexical complexity, which a simple student-style rewriting prompt removes (AI recall 0.92 0.60 with gpt-4o-mini, 0.41 with Qwen3). The embedding-based detector stays robust for whole texts (AI recall 0.94) but not for single sentences (AI recall as low as 0.59). Mixed text falls between the two classes, and text without traceable AI material is classified as human-written in about 95\% of texts.

en
arXiv AI Papers

UCB-min: Combining Bandits Under Variance Heterogeneity (Extended Version)

Multi-armed bandits are a natural framework for many real-world sequential decision problems, from recommender systems and clinical trials to educational test recommendation and online advertising. The performance of these algorithms depends on how they explore different arms, and exploration strategies range from variance-independent (e.g., UCB1) to variance-aware (e.g., UCB-V). In practice the reward variance of each arm is rarely known and varies widely across arms, and the reward support is often underspecified. In these cases no single rule is uniformly best: variance-independent methods are robust but loose when variances are small, while variance-aware methods are tight only when their variance estimates and the assumed support bound are reliable. Such heterogeneous, unknown variances arise in many settings, for instance when multiple objectives are scalarized into a single reward. We propose UCB-min, a per-arm adaptive meta-algorithm that selects, for each arm, the tighter of a variance-independent and a variance-aware exploration bonus, without prior knowledge of the variance regime and without reward normalization. We prove that, with UCB-V as variance-aware base, its regret is bounded by the sum of the two base bounds at the standard exploration constant, and by their per-arm minimum, up to a constant, for a larger one. We validate it on synthetic data, an educational tutoring task, and two group-recommendation benchmarks (MovieLens, Steam), showing that UCB-min consistently tracks the best base algorithm across diverse variance regimes and datasets.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Two-Phase Rapid Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Simulators

We introduce Rapid Simulation Based Inference (RSBI), a diffusion-based variational approach to likelihood-free Bayesian inference that achieves high sampling efficiency under large prior-to-posterior volumes. RSBI builds on advances in Schrödinger Bridge (SB) diffusion sampling to handle multi-modal posteriors, with an initial likelihood supplied by a distance measure via a differentiable simulator. The key innovation of this initial surrogate likelihood is that it gives a highly efficient proposal distribution, replacing sequential rounds of other methods with an efficient one-shot proposal. Subsequent refinement then transports the proposal to the true posterior as specified by the simulator and the original prior. The SB sampler is warm-started from the proposal, and its energy is corrected by a neural likelihood ratio that is learned only where the proposal places mass. As a variational method, RSBI does not suffer from prior leakage commonly observed in standard sequential posterior estimation methods. To improve mode coverage we optionally utilize the well-tempered meta-dynamics framework, which also encourages exploration of the prior volume. We observe strong performance on standard SBI benchmarks, particularly when the prior volume is increased relative to the ground truth posterior, achieving a performance degradation of only 5\% on Two Moons under a highly constrained simulation budget. Additionally, we evaluate RSBI's performance for gravitational wave ring-down posterior estimation, in a real-world physics benchmark inspired by black hole spectroscopy.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Clinical predictions using artificial intelligence in neurosurgery and its subspecialties: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Artificial intelligence models for clinical prediction are proliferating across neurosurgery, but their aggregate discriminative performance, distribution along the care pathway and methodological quality are unclear. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed these studies in neurosurgery and its subspecialities along with their risk of bias appraisal. We performed a PRISMA search for peer-reviewed original studies using AI to predict a clinical outcome in neurosurgical populations. Metrics were pooled using random effects modelling. Each study was classified as diagnostic, prognostic or forecasting and was assigned an evidence level. Clinical prediction task sub-stratification analysis was performed. Risk-of-bias was assessed using PROBAST. 1063 studies were included. Across 451 studies reporting AUC, pooled discrimination was 0.86, ranging from 0.84 (spine) to 0.87 (neuro-oncology), with extreme heterogeneity. Performance varied by clinical pathway stage, highest for diagnosis, grading and molecular tasks and lowest for post-operative tasks. Only 51 studies were using prospective data with external validation, whereas 619 rested on internal validation alone or no validation. 89 percent studies were at high risk-of-bias, driven by the analysis domain. AI models report high performance across all the neurosurgical subspecialities, concordant across AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity and robust to risk-of-bias stratification. Performance is highest for imaging-anchored diagnostic tasks and lowest at decision-facing post-operative stage. However, the literature is dominated by optimism-prone, internally-validated and poorly calibrated models with extreme heterogeneity. External validation, calibration analysis and reporting guidelines adherence remain prerequisites for clinical adoption.

en
Meta — overfeed.news