The revamped projects feature in Claude Code allows users to run multiple agents under the same roof, with a shared memory, goals, and library of…
Assine o Pro, sem anúncios
Faça upgrade para uma leitura sem interrupções e acesso prioritário a novas fontes.
Ver preçosCoding agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for robot manipulation: a language model writes the robot controller as a program, and agents built in this way now operate robots without robot-specific training.Whether this paradigm is also safe, however, has not been asked. We evaluate coding agent under a safety constraint, where each task pairs a manipulation goal with an obstacle the robot must not touch. The agent pursues the goal but collides with the obstacle in most cases, treating task completion as its sole objective while neglecting safety. The agent reasons about the obstacle in its traces, and the prompt already forbids touching it, so neither perception nor instruction is at fault; the fault lies in the planning, where the stated constraint never becomes a priority. By decomposing manipulation into a route phase and a contact-rich moment, we locate the source of the failure. Along the route, the model cannot prioritize the safety constraint, having no notion of a clearing route and none of replanning once a chosen route becomes infeasible. At the contact, it is unaware that contact execution is bounded by the same constraint. To close this gap, we present SafeHarness, which equips the model with two obstacle-aware harnesses that enable it to prioritize the safety constraint. Obstacle-aware route planning grounds the objects as bounding boxes and draws candidate routes over them as sequences of waypoints. The agent then plans a route in advance, verifies it, replans when necessary, and only then executes it. Obstacle-aware contact execution instead selects the contact position so that the contact itself avoids the obstacle. SafeHarness attains 71.9% task success and 87.5% collision avoidance, surpassing the previous SOTA by 6.5% and 27.0%, respectively. These results are 2.3and 1.5those of the same agent without harnesses.
Embedding spaces define notions of semantic similarity and distance. We study whether those embeddings reflect physical measurements of mass, distance, time and volume, which admit a unique, objective notion of semantic equivalence and distance. We find that physical measurement is only weakly modeled in the embedding space, and that instead quite peculiar measurement patterns can be observed. Further analysis indicates that embedding representations of physical measurements are strongly influenced by superficial string similarity, and recalibration of similarity does not substantially improve the alignment.
Complex robotic manipulation tasks frequently require a long-term memory of past events and actions. As conditioning on full histories renders policies prone to spurious correlations and degrades performance, many approaches to policy memory involve compressing historical information through expensive VLM queries in-the-loop to process only task-salient information. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach in which computationally intensive VLM queries are made during train-time to learn a lightweight latent memory that can be efficiently queried at deployment time. Our representation, which we call the workspace token, is trained by (1) using a VLM to identify current and historical information necessary for completing a task, then (2) distilling these into the workspace token using a set-reconstruction decoder loss. In both simulation and hardware, we show that the workspace token can be used as a drop-in replacement for observations during deployment, enabling policies to solve memory-intensive tasks without the need for VLM reasoning in-the-loop. Interestingly, we found that workspace tokens are not only more lightweight but also lead to better policy performance.
Modeling articulated objects from sparse monocular views is challenging because each observation reveals only partial geometry and motion evidence. Most feed-forward methods infer articulation from a single observation and therefore rely heavily on learned category-level shape priors. We present FAMOS, a feed-forward model that predicts movable-part segmentation and joint parameters from a sparse, unordered set of partial point clouds. Our model jointly reasons over multiple observations and naturally supports a variable number of inputs, including a single view. To aggregate articulation cues across observations, we introduce a Multi-state Articulation Transformer with alternating state-wise and global attention. We further propose an observed articulation span objective that supervises the motion range each part exhibits across the input observations, encouraging the model to leverage the full observation set. To overcome the limited scale and diversity of existing datasets, we introduce a procedural data generator that synthesizes self-annotated assets during training. Experiments on PartNet-Mobility, ACD, and ArtiCraft-10K demonstrate consistent improvements over both feed-forward and optimization-based baselines. Project page: https://kevinqu7.github.io/famos
Professional design requires any-color control: the ability to specify an object's target color with any 24-bit hex value for image generation and editing. Prior work has explored color generation, editing, and colorization, but often relies on dedicated color representations or specialized inference procedures. Advances in large language models offer a simpler starting point: even compact models can associate hex values with color semantics. We present Paint-Anything, which learns a shared hex-prompt interface for generation and editing through object-level color supervision. We develop a data pipeline that constructs Paint-500K from real images through object grounding, perceptual color labeling, and editing-pair synthesis. Since shadows make real-image labels only approximate colors, we complement this supervision with pure-color anchors whose pixels exactly match their paired hex values. These anchors are used only at high-noise timesteps, leaving low-noise training to natural images. We further introduce Any Color Benchmark (ACBench), comprising ACBench-T2I and ACBench-Edit, to measure object-level hex color fidelity across both tasks. On FLUX.2-4B, Paint-Anything improves ACBench-T2I and ACBench-Edit scores by 85.3% and 28.3%, respectively, relative to the base model, with ablations supporting the training recipe. It also achieves the highest average CompColor score among the compared methods.
Hereditary polyposis syndromes can be precursor lesions to colorectal cancer and are associated with a broad spectrum of extracolonic tumors. Early identification and accurate classification of these syndromes are essential for timely diagnosis, individualized patient management, and targeted surveillance strategies for affected families. However, public endoscopic datasets are largely organized around the individual sporadic polyp, and none links the polyposis phenotype to histopathology and germline findings at the patient level. Here, we present ERCPMP-Gx, an endoscopic, histopathological, and genomic dataset developed to support the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the recognition, characterization, and classification of colorectal polyposis. Most procedures were performed using the Olympus EVIS X1 system with white-light endoscopy (WLE), narrow-band imaging (NBI), magnifying NBI (M-NBI), and NBI with near focus modes, yielding 160 images and accompanying video clips. Approximately eighty percent of cases represent clinically and/or genetically confirmed hereditary polyposis syndromes (PG), including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), and ganglioneuroma syndrome (GNS), while the remaining twenty percent comprise non-hereditary polyps and polyp-mimicking lesions with overlapping morphological features (Non-PG), included to support differential classification. Each released record is linked, where available, to standardized endoscopic annotations, representative histopathology, and clinically reported germline findings, forming an AI-ready, patient-level annotation framework. The dataset is publicly accessible at Mendeley (https://doi.org/10.17632/nzyfc544bx.2). For the latest updates and further information, readers are referred to the DataBioX website: https://databiox.com.
Pretraining a neural PDE surrogate can reduce the amount of new CFD data needed when geometry or modeled physics changes. However, it remains unclear how different components of distribution shift affect this benefit. We pretrain a surrogate on 254,909 RANS solutions from one airfoil family and fine-tune it on a new family under two target settings with matched freestream ranges: the same Spalart-Allmaras (SA) modeling and SA with added e^N transition modeling. At N=1000, the pretrained model matches the accuracy of a model trained from scratch on 3.25as many samples for the same-SA target, but 2.58as many for the transition-modeled target. By N=5000, this ordering reverses (1.56versus 1.86). At N=1000, sampling more distinct airfoils lowers error on both targets, but only for the same-SA target is the gain increase larger than the observed draw-to-draw variation (3.3to 4.0). These results show that pretraining value depends jointly on target-data budget, target-data coverage, and whether source and target differ in modeled physics.
Frontier coding agents are increasingly trusted to work autonomously for long periods, yet an agent's final response is often the only account of that work a user sees. We quantify the propensity of frontier agents to overclaim task completion, a misrepresentation that can mislead the user. An agent overclaims when its final response contradicts information in its context. This definition requires no inference about intent and is independent of task success. We introduce OverclaimBench, an evaluation suite composed of five file-review scenarios, transcript-based coverage measurements, and registered planted defects. We evaluate eight proprietary frontier models in their own production command-line interfaces, and four open-weight models under a single fixed harness on OverclaimBench and find that 1) agents do not read all the files they were asked to review in 67.9\% of runs; 2) among runs where not all files are read, agents are misleading 80.4\% of the time (59--96\% per model), either falsely claiming to have read all files or omitting that coverage is incomplete; 3) requiring delegation to subagents increased reading coverage, but among reviews that remained incomplete, a large majority were still misleading; and 4) agents that falsely claimed a complete review missed planted defects at about 1.8 times the rate of agents that read every file, showing that claims of completion can conceal substantive failures. Together, these results show that agents' final responses are not reliable accounts of their actions.
Hostile rhetoric toward social groups can normalize exclusion and justify mistreatment, as well as contribute to rising polarization and political violence. Efforts to moderate hostile rhetoric in online speech draw on foundational theories in social and moral psychology, and political science. However, these theories were developed largely in parallel, often propose different and sometimes conflicting accounts of how hostility develops, and have rarely been tested against each other in real discourse. The result is a fragmented understanding of the rhetorical mechanisms of hostility, without a clear sense of how they appear, and relate to each other, in real-world discourse. Using 2.86 million posts from TikTok, Truth Social, and Twitter/X during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we model the mechanisms of six foundational theories of intergroup hostility -- boundary construction, threat construction, scapegoating, negative evaluation, dehumanization, and action orientation -- within a common empirical framework to recover the broader organization of intergroup hostility rhetoric. Structurally, we find that boundary construction and threat construction anchor the system; temporally, we find that these mechanisms tend to follow a regular ordering: boundary construction, derogation, and action orientation tend to appear early; dehumanization and threat construction later; scapegoating latest. Mapping how these theoretical frameworks actually manifest in discourse bridges longstanding divisions across social science traditions and presents computational social science with a clearer empirical foundation for modeling intergroup hostility rhetoric beyond single-label detection.
Reinforcement learning (RL) of large language models is notoriously sensitive to small differences between training and inference engines, often referred to as the training-inference mismatch (TIM). However, completely eliminating TIM is impractical, as it would come at a major cost to rollout efficiency. In this paper, we show that the instability of RL under TIM is primarily caused by drift: a persistent bias between training and inference engines that accumulates with every training step. We derive an additive "score centering" correction term that stabilizes RL under TIM by canceling drift. When training models from 0.6B to 30B parameters, score centering alone matches or outperforms methods based on importance sampling under quantization, with the gap growing as the mismatch becomes more severe. Because the correction is additive, score centering also composes with importance sampling -- their composition outperforms pure importance-sampling baselines in our staleness experiments.
Coding harnesses shape how autonomous coding agents translate model capabilities into long-horizon software-engineering performance, yet existing work typically evaluates harnesses as monolithic systems, leaving the effectiveness of individual components unclear. To enable component-level comparisons, we study this question with a lightweight coding harness whose execution loop is fixed while three components are varied: planning, action space, and context management. Across four models evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1, we evaluate 176 matched settings spanning five context-management strategies, four context-window budgets, and targeted ablations of planning and action space. We find that: (1) Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens, with most of its benefit coming from preventing context-overflow failures. (2) Staging rule-based elision before LLM-based summarization provides the strongest overall efficiency among the context-management strategies, whereas making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain. (3) Planning shifts from an accuracy scaffold for weaker models to a cost saver for stronger models, with little change in accuracy. (4) Predefined tools improve performance for models with weaker bash proficiency, whereas bash-capable models can operate effectively with a bash-only interface and achieve substantially lower cost, especially on command-line-centric tasks. Trajectory-level analysis explains these effects: context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior, planning changes where trajectories stop, and the action space changes the granularity at which code is written. These findings inform model- and budget-aware harness design and provide a modular framework for evaluating future harness components.
World modeling enables intelligence to anticipate consequences, guide interventions, and learn from interaction. Yet predictive models remain domain-specific: can a common learning principle support world modeling across radically different systems? We introduce JEPA-Anything, a domain-agnostic framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization (OPF). Extending joint-embedding predictive architectures, OPF decomposes latent targets into complementary factors, learns them through dedicated pathways, and recombines them within a shared predictive design. We evaluate JEPA-Anything across seven domains: vision, biology, clinical trajectories, control, molecular dynamics, physical fields, and weather. Experiments span representation learning, intervention prediction, out-of-distribution generalization, and long-horizon dynamics, including 10 matched dynamics tasks, forecasting of over 1,000 clinical events, and 100-step molecular rollouts across four systems. Against matched JEPA baselines, JEPA-Anything improves reported metrics on all 10 dynamics tasks and reduces single-intervention prediction error on Interventional Pong by 34.8%. It achieves the lowest one-step and 100-step molecular errors among compared methods in all four systems. Beyond prediction, a factor-nominated biological intervention receives experimental support in cell co-cultures, patient-derived organoids, tumor fragments, and mice; latent orbital modes recover the Keplerian scaling exponent with a fitted slope of -1.4991. These results support a common factorized predictive principle across heterogeneous worlds, connecting world modeling with intervention and experimentally grounded scientific discovery. Code: https://github.com/Gen-Verse/JEPA-Anything
Amazon Connect Talent is an AI hiring solution built for talent acquisition leaders managing scaled hiring. It delivers AI-led interviews, data-driven assessments, and consistent evaluation, helping recruiters identify strong candidates more efficiently while providing applicants with a flexible interview experience. Informed by decades of Amazon's hiring science, Amazon Connect Talent provides transparency for every assessment, interview, and candidate score, enabling…
Generative models are increasingly used to solve scientific inverse problems, but existing evaluations still focus primarily on whether a method can produce a single plausible reconstruction. This is insufficient for ill-posed problems, where multiple solutions may be consistent with the same sparse or noisy observations. In these settings, a method can achieve strong pointwise accuracy while still failing to capture the true posterior through mode collapse, overconfident uncertainty, or averaging incompatible solutions. We introduce PosteriorBench, a benchmark for evaluating the distributional accuracy of generative inverse solvers. PosteriorBench evaluates four physics-based inverse problems: Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference. For each task, we construct high-fidelity reference posteriors using computationally heavy but established procedures such as rejection sampling and Markov chain Monte Carlo, enabling direct assessment of whether solvers recover the full set of solutions rather than the single best sample. We pair these references with a five-metric posterior evaluation suite: posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error. These metrics assess pointwise accuracy, marginal uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity. The benchmark spans sparse sensing, low-resolution observations, nonlinear forward models, varying noise levels, and multimodal priors, with a unified pipeline for distribution matching and uncertainty quantification. Our experiments reveal substantial distribution-matching gaps across current solvers, while showing that neural operators improve resolution robustness, and guidance weights and generation noise are key to posterior-variance calibration.
Multi-turn agents trained with reinforcement learning (RL) receive a single scalar reward per trajectory, which motivates self on-policy distillation (OPD) to supply dense token-level supervision from a self-teacher with privileged task skills, letting a skill-free student internalize them. This recipe, however, is undermined by two findings in agentic tasks: privileged information alone does not always make a teacher reliable, and the benefit of teacher supervision is stage-dependent. We therefore propose RetireOPD (Self-Retiring On-Policy Distillation), which first optimizes a decoupled, skill-conditioned teacher with environment rewards and then trains a skill-free student jointly with RL and OPD. Rather than following a predefined distillation schedule, RetireOPD adopts Adaptive Retirement: the student drops the teacher on its own once their discrepancy stops shrinking and it reaches a target fraction of the teacher's success rate, after which training proceeds with RL alone. Across Qwen2.5 models from 1.5B to 7B, RetireOPD improves ALFWorld success rate over RL baseline by 14.1% to 18.8% and WebShop accuracy by 11.8% to 19.0%, and surpasses its own skill-conditioned teacher in every setting.
Safety evaluations for large language models rely on surface-form classifiers that report declining harm scores across model generations. We provide evidence that this methodology is systematically incomplete: explicit discriminatory content is transformed rather than removed. We call this harm laundering. Analysing 450,000 gender-directed completions across 15 models spanning GPT-2 through to GPT-5 (OpenAI GPT lineage; three demographic conditions), we show that sexual violence clusters prevalent in GPT-2 women-directed output disappear by GPT-4, while men-directed completions gain positive representational territory (caregiving, emotional range, ally identity) that women-directed completions do not. The pattern is most visible at GPT-5: Topic~5 (1,997~documents) frames breast cancer as a men's rights debate, while zero equivalent clusters appear in women-directed output. Three independent classifiers score this content as non-toxic. Sentiment scores invert at GPT-4: early models demean women; later models over-correct. Topic diversity in women-directed completions falls 36\% relative to men at the GPT-4 alignment boundary (W/M~= 0.58, from 0.91 at GPT-2). REGARD representational harm disparity correlates with release date (ρ= +0.55, p = .034) while Detoxify does not (ρ= -0.23, p = .42): toxicity scores fall as representational harm grows. We formalise harm laundering as a three-criteria test and provide a three-stage detection protocol applicable to any generative model. Within the OpenAI GPT lineage, toxicity score reduction is not a sufficient proxy for harm reduction.
Action chunking is widely used for action generation and execution in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, yet existing approaches commonly use a fixed action horizon. During a rollout, different task stages may require different levels of action continuity, control precision, and closed-loop feedback, making a fixed horizon unable to accommodate changing control requirements. We propose GeoAAC, a geometry-based adaptive action chunking method for flow-based VLA policies that adjusts the action horizon according to the reliability of the current action prediction. We show that the geometry of Flow Matching denoising trajectories provides process-level information for characterizing prediction reliability, with geometric variation across action prefixes remaining positively correlated with predictive uncertainty. GeoAAC uses this prefix-wise geometry to construct a horizon-wise geometric profile and adaptively determine the action horizon from a single generation without additional training. Experiments with GR00T N1.5 and π0.5 on LIBERO, LIBERO-Pro, RoboCasa365, and real-world manipulation tasks show consistent improvements over fixed-action-horizon baselines and existing adaptive methods, including up to 8.7 percentage points in simulation and an increase in average real-world success rate from 53.3\% to 74.4\%.
