overfeed.news
Anuncio

SRExpert

Deja de saltar entre 6 herramientas de Kubernetes.

Monitoreo, alertas, seguridad, despliegues Helm y operaciones con IA en una sola plataforma.

Probar 30 días gratis

Tema

Agentes

3061documentos

251últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

Collision Snapshot Guided Time-Reversed Safety-Critical Scenario Generation

The generation of safety-critical traffic scenarios is essential for training and evaluating autonomous vehicles. Prior approaches typically perturb the trajectories of existing agents in a traffic scenario using simplified adversarial objectives to induce safety-critical interactions, which can limit the plausibility and diversity of the generated scenarios. Although inserting new adversarial vehicles can alleviate this limitation, determining when and where to introduce them in a scenario-specific manner remains challenging. In this work, we introduce {CO}llision {S}napshot guided {T}im{E}-{R}eversed safety-critical scenario generation (COSTER), a framework that leverages learned traffic priors to determine plausible collision times and locations. COSTER first constructs a collision snapshot by inserting a new vehicle in contact with the target vehicle at the identified collision state within a traffic scenario. Starting from this collision snapshot, a conditional variational autoencoder is used to perform a time-reversed rollout, reconstructing the trajectory of the inserted vehicle backward toward earlier timesteps. Experiments show that COSTER outperforms existing methods in plausibility, diversity, and data efficiency. Moreover, agents trained on COSTER-generated scenarios reduce collision rates by 31\% on safety-critical scenarios from the Waymo Open Motion Dataset while also improving ego task completion. The project website is available at https://anonym-121.github.io/COSTER/.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction

Graph-agentic retrieval-augmented generation combines structured evidence with adaptive controllers that can plan retrieval, traverse relations, verify intermediate claims, delegate subtasks, and use tools. This combination is useful when answers depend on relations across documents, entities, time, or institutions, but it also creates coupled failure paths: a defect in graph construction can become retrieved evidence, alter later control decisions, and propagate toward a consequential outcome. We examine how such systems should be designed and evaluated for social-good settings in which freshness, authorization, traceability, oversight, and recourse matter alongside answer quality. We organize the literature by graph substrate, graph lifecycle, agent function, coordination pattern, and authority boundary, and distinguish graph-based retrieval from observation-dependent graph control. We then synthesize reported risks as an evidence-to-action failure chain and propose an assurance-by-construction blueprint comprising five interface contracts for evidence, retrieval, reasoning, capability and delegation, and outcome. These contracts make provenance, temporal validity, authorization, uncertainty, and recoverability explicit at system boundaries. An illustrative public-benefit information design shows how the framework constrains graph structure, permissions, abstention, and operating authority. Finally, we derive an evaluation agenda spanning graph assertions, trajectories, claims, coordination, and outcomes.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Robust Conformal Consensus: Multi-Agent LLM-as-a-Judge Interval Evaluation with Conformal Prediction

LLM-as-a-Judge has emerged as a promising paradigm for evaluating natural language generation. However, the uncertainty associated with such evaluations remains largely unexplored, which limits their reliability in real-world applications. Although conformal prediction offers a principled framework for uncertainty quantification, existing approaches typically apply it to a single LLM judge, overlooking the variability introduced by using different LLM evaluators. In this work, we propose a robust uncertainty estimation framework for multi-agent LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation. Our approach constructs conformal prediction intervals for LLM-based scores from multiple LLMs. By considering intervals from different LLM judges, we obtain more stable and reliable uncertainty estimates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method produces valid prediction intervals with coverage guarantees, and that interval-based aggregation across multiple judges leads to more stable evaluation outcomes.

en
arXiv AI Papers

AutoKD: Autonomous Knowledge Discovery

Scientific discovery in data-rich domains is currently constrained by human bandwidth: the growth in the volume and complexity of real-world data far outpaces the rate at which researchers can read, reason, and synthesize. Recent LLM-based multi-agent systems have begun to automate portions of the research cycle, but they target hypothesis generation in settings where validation cannot itself be automated, and each run is one-shot, with no mechanism for findings to accumulate or steer subsequent inquiry. This paper introduces AutoKD, a multi-agent framework for autonomous knowledge discovery that is both computational and cumulative, allowing validated findings to persist and inform subsequent inquiry. Six coordinated LLM agents collaborate in an open-ended discovery loop, where accepted findings are stored in a persistent insight graph that serves as both long-term memory and an exploration-steering mechanism. We evaluate AutoKD on three diverse datasets from two perspectives: Open-ended Quality against published findings, and Conditioned Quality via literature-derived queries. Across both evaluation perspectives, AutoKD covers known findings and surfaces substantive discoveries that complement human-driven research. Our code is available at https://github.com/GeQinwen/AutoKD.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Multi-Step Tool-Calling over Korean Open Public APIs: A Benchmark and a Data-Synthesis Recipe

Data-sovereignty regulations increasingly require public institutions to deploy open-source, on-premise LLM agents that chain multiple tool-calls across live government APIs. However, open-source models consistently underperform in this multi-step setting, and no existing benchmark measures the gap. We introduce the Korean Open Public API Benchmark (KOPA-Bench), comprising 145 real-world tasks. To close this gap, we present EDGE, an Execution-grounded Dynamic Graph for tool-calling data synthEsis driven by live execution. EDGE builds a graph of how each tool's output can feed another's input, keeps only the links that succeed when actually called against the live APIs, and traverses these verified links to synthesize executable multi-step trajectories. Fine-tuned via GRPO on the resulting dataset, our 9B model nearly matches the untuned 27B model from the same family, improving substantially not only on KOPA-Bench but also on the BFCL benchmark.

en