Anuncio

Privum

Construimos, protegemos y operamos tu infraestructura digital.

Software, sistemas de IA, pruebas de penetración y nube segura para empresas.

Hablar con Privum

Tema

Agentes

3029documentos

234últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

Phantom Consensus: Measuring Social Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLM Decision-Making

Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly aggregate judgments across model instances, but reasoning about other agents can itself introduce failure. We study a setting in which LLMs shift their public decisions after observing ambiguous social signals while reporting inaccurate estimates of what other agents privately judged, even when the group's recorded private judgments do not support the apparent consensus. We call this failure phantom consensus and study it as a pluralistic-ignorance-style pattern in controlled LLM collectives. To measure this phenomenon, we introduce PHANTOM-Bench, a benchmark that separates isolated private judgments, public decisions after ambiguous social signals, elicited estimates of the group's private judgment, transparency-based recovery, and controls for neutral public text and explicit vote-following. Across nine closed- and open-weight models, ambiguous public signals consistently degrade decision quality and can turn correct private group judgments into incorrect public collective outcomes. Public accuracy drops by as much as 47.8 percentage points, and collective rationality failures reach 47.3% in the most susceptible setting. We observe substantial errors in reported group-private beliefs alongside public-stage failures, while control conditions reveal model-dependent differences in susceptibility to ambiguous and explicit peer signals. Revealing the agents' recorded private decisions repairs many failures without revealing the gold label, although recovery varies across models. Our results show that evaluating multi-agent LLM systems requires measuring not only final agreement, but whether that agreement reflects independently measured private judgments or an apparent consensus.

en
arXiv AI Papers

More with Less: Efficient Parallel Scientific Code Translation via an Agent-Skill Workflow

Translating parallel scientific codes between HPC programming frameworks is a critical but labor-intensive task. Existing LLM-based approaches rely on fixed sequential pipelines with undifferentiated repair strategies and correctness criteria that do not match scientific computing practice. We present an agent-skill framework that separates translation, compilation diagnosis, and execution validation into three autonomous agents coordinated by a verdict-driven orchestrator, routing each failure to a targeted repair skill rather than retrying blindly. An automated output check drives the self-correction loop, complemented by an offline LLM-based verification that exposes false positives escaping compiler and runtime checks. We evaluate the framework on 30 HeCBench kernels translated bidirectionally among CUDA, OpenMP, and SYCL with three open-source LLMs. Our framework attains the higher verified correctness rate in all 18 model and direction combinations over a state-of-the-art baseline while consuming up to 52.4% fewer tokens, remaining consistent across models and directions without architectural modification.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Flex-RSI: Benchmarking Recursive Self-Improvement of Frontier Agents

Frontier language models are increasingly deployed as agents, and how well an agent performs depends not only on its model but also on its harness: the prompts, tools, memory, and control loop through which the model acts. When an agent is applied to a new problem, a natural question is whether it can use the feedback of the task to improve the way it works, and not merely its answer. Most existing benchmarks keep the agent's harness fixed and score the solution it produces, or target large-scale model training. We introduce Flex-RSI, a benchmark for the recursive self-improvement of agents on vision and robotics tasks under a fixed budget. In each round, an executor improves the task solution, which is kept only if it scores higher on held-out validation data, and an improver then revises the harness, including the executor and itself. Every run starts from the same general-purpose harness, and the final solution is scored on hidden test data. Evaluating closed-source and open-weight models on tasks spanning perception, reasoning, robot action, 3D reconstruction, visual creation, and infrastructure, we find that self-improvement helps most when the agent builds its own solution, that feedback recording only success or failure holds back open-weight models, and that open-weight models fall furthest behind where outputs must pass strict checks of physical stability or exact correctness. Paired runs further show that editing the harness itself contributes to the gains.

en
arXiv AI Papers

DRAFT-Bench: Evaluating Frontier Agents Across the Professional Design Lifecycle

Can frontier general-purpose agents understand client intent, explore creative directions, execute revisions, and prepare production deliverables? We introduce DRAFT-Bench (Design Reliability Across Feedback and Tasks), a lifecycle-oriented evaluation of requirement elicitation, creative exploration, constrained editing, iterative revision, and production handoff. Its Requirement-to-Artifact framework links evolving requirements, protected properties, artifact versions, and delivery obligations. We compare native Codex/Astra and Claude Code across 35 design briefs under 43 conditions, alongside a separate 40-scenario RFQ track. Astra completes 43/43 design conditions and Claude 35/43. All scored core runs receive full structural credit, yet on the 28 core conditions scored for both systems, semantic checks flag violations in 11 for Astra and 5 for Claude; these are model judgments, not expert-confirmed failure rates. RFQ coverage is high, but success ordering changes across cohorts. SKU expansion, revision dependencies, and White ink files expose ambiguity among unmet obligations, missing inputs, and evaluator interpretations. These findings separate execution, requirement compliance, and professional acceptance. Unpaired tracks and different tools preclude claims of RFQ-to-delivery success, factory acceptance, or a pure model ranking.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Glyph: An Interpretability Engine for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery in Clinical Data

Automated scientific discovery has the potential to advance understanding of disease mechanisms and accelerate identification of early disease markers. Manual data annotation is infeasible at population scale, motivating methods that automatically extract pre-defined phenotypes in multimodal and unstructured clinical data. Such pre-defined feature sets determine and limit which associations these approaches can discover. This limitation extends to agentic AI systems that use these tools to query population-scale data. In contrast, foundation models (FMs) trained on large volumes of clinical data can perform tasks beyond their training objectives. This suggests their latent embeddings may represent novel or unexplored features that could yield insights into disease mechanisms, yet such latent features remain difficult to interpret. To address this challenge, we introduce Glyph, an automated multistage framework that extracts features from multimodal and unstructured clinical data using FMs and sparse autoencoders, interprets them as coded clinical concepts, and evaluates their value for clinical scientific discovery. We applied Glyph to abdominal CT volumes, CT radiology reports and laboratory measurements from 41,628 patients across different institutions. We identified 397 predictive concepts supported by 4,463 Bonferroni-significant associations. Moreover, a majority of discovered associations were automatically reproducible in held-out cohorts across different sites. Glyph concepts provided complementary associations to literature-derived markers, leading to gains in predictive power. We envision that interpretability can extend beyond a mechanistic understanding of neural networks to connecting implicitly learned features with clinical knowledge and establishing their significance for patient outcomes. We release Glyph at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/Glyph.

en
arXiv AI Papers

HomeLoop: A Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot-IoT Coordination in Everyday Domestic Assistance and Safety

Recent progress in embodied robotics is bringing robots closer to deployment in homes, as vision-language models (VLMs) are demonstrating significant advances in reasoning, making VLM-driven robots promising home assistant agents. These agents will often be introduced into homes that already have cameras, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and residents with wearables. To fulfill their potential, they need to integrate with existing smart infrastructure and reason through ambiguous scenarios: a smoke alarm may come from a pan about to ignite, a pan already on fire, a resident cooking or a faulty sensor, and each calls for a different response. To that end, we introduce HomeLoop, a simulation framework and benchmark built on Isaac Sim that combines robot bodies, networked devices and wearables, simulated residents and visitors, faulty sensors, and hazards that evolve over time. Our benchmark is composed of 20 tasks across five families grounded in real-world household hazards and needs, and designed so that the same alert can have different causes. A runtime monitor scores each episode with temporal-logic checks on the final outcome and the actions along the way, and every action carries a predefined cost. We evaluate six open-weight and proprietary VLMs. The best achieves a family-balanced score of 61.9%, and across models we see a pattern of over-reaction: failed episodes involving prohibited interventions outnumber those involving missed required interventions by more than two to one, with models often shutting off the stove before investigating the alarm's cause. HomeLoop is an extensible foundation intended for use in research on robot-IoT coordination, long-term memory, proactive assistance, and privacy-safety trade-offs. HomeLoop will be released with 2,100 home layouts that can be automatically furnished in diverse configurations, five robot bodies and 20 networked device types.

en
arXiv AI Papers

From Procedures to Permissions: Learning Precise Subagent Authorization from Agent Skills

As language agents tackle increasingly complex tasks, they increasingly rely on multiple agents to coordinate specialized work, requiring decisions not only about what each subagent should do but also which tools and workspace resources it should access. Existing agent systems provide mechanisms for controlling tools and execution environments, but do not directly specify the resources required by each delegated subtask. Moreover, task outcomes and execution trajectories alone provide limited supervision for determining whether a subagent has received appropriate permissions. We observe that Agent Skills encode procedural knowledge describing the operations, tools, and files required at each step, providing a natural source of supervision for authorization. Building on this observation, we synthesize tasks and step-by-step procedures from Skills, execute them through subagent delegation in interactive environments, and use verified trajectories to construct training data for task execution and authorization. On ClawArena-Team, our method improves tool permission precision by 13.4 percentage points and workspace permission precision by 24.1 percentage points, while increasing overall task success by 11.6 percentage points for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. On Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SkillsBench, our method remains competitive with existing agent data synthesis approaches. These results show that the procedural knowledge embedded in Agent Skills provides a source of supervision for precise subagent orchestration that task outcomes alone cannot provide.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Rethinking Agent Trajectory Compression: A Workflow-Aware Perspective

As long-horizon agents increasingly rely on multi-step tool interactions to accomplish complex tasks, their execution trajectories continuously accumulate structured outputs and intermediate artifacts, leading to growing context overhead. Existing compression methods primarily rely on text importance or fixed truncation rules, often overlooking cross-step dependencies within workflows and potentially discarding critical information required for subsequent task execution. To address this challenge, we propose WAAC, a workflow-aware framework for agent trajectory compression. WAAC structurally models successful historical trajectories to extract reusable workflow compression experience and incorporates online backward dependency analysis to dynamically identify information retention requirements. By combining current dependency constraints with historical experience, WAAC selects appropriate compression strategies for different types of historical information. Experiments on PinchBench and Odysseys demonstrate that WAAC achieves an overall score of 87.6 and a perfect completion rate of 19.0%, respectively, while reducing execution costs by 19.7% and 29.1% compared with the strongest baseline methods. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of workflow-aware trajectory compression in improving task performance and cost efficiency for long-horizon agents. Code and resources are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/waac-6527/.

en
arXiv AI Papers

I Think, Therefore I Attack: Evaluating Thought Injection Attacks on Reasoning Agents

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are one of the key components of current agentic systems. LRMs augment their output with an explicit chain-of-thought reasoning stage, introducing a new attack surface for thought injection, in which untrusted text resembling the model's own deliberation is fed back to the model. We present a two-part study of this attack, performed against the prevailing large, production class open-weight models (e.g., GLM-5.3, MiniMax-M2.5, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next). We first evaluate the effectiveness of static thought-injection prompts under different styles as well as tagged and untagged conditions and find that the effects of thinking tags and payload styles are all properties of the specific target model. In the second study, we exploit this model-specificity in a containerized agentic cyber range, using indirect injection prompts styled in the form of the target model's own reasoning traces to achieve attack success rates (ASR) up to 50% on operational objectives such as reverse-shell exfiltration and repository backdooring. We also find that the same malicious objective in standard prompt injection user voice never succeeds, and thinking tags suppress the agent's tendency to disclose the injection. Our results show that imitating a reasoning model's own thought style is effective for this style of attack, and that tag stripping is an unreliable defense.

en
The Verge AI

Muse has a voice mode now

Meta now lets you have voice conversations with your Muse AI agent in real time, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced today. The feature has been rolled…

en