Uber only fulfilled 4 rides from AI agents last quarter
AI agents won't be stealing Uber's lunch any time soon. Only four rides were arranged by third-party AI agents during the third quarter of 2026…
en
Meta
478
25
Deep Meets Classical: A CPU-Efficient Decision-Fusion Model for Automatic Modulation Classification
Automatic modulation classification (AMC) underpins spectrum sensing and non-cooperative signal identification in cognitive radio, yet the two standard CPU-feasible approaches to it, a compact convolutional neural network (CNN) on raw in-phase and quadrature (I/Q) samples and a classical higher-order-cumulant feature classifier, are rarely compared against each other conditioned on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We show that they are, in fact, complementary: the CNN is markedly more robust at low SNR, where hand-crafted statistics collapse toward chance, while the cumulant classifier is more accurate at high SNR, where higher-order statistics cleanly separate dense constellations. We exploit this complementarity with FuseAMC, a lightweight decision-fusion model that trains a logistic-regression meta-combiner over the concatenated class-posteriors of an approximately 198k-parameter residual CNN and a gradient-boosted-tree cumulant classifier, on a validation split disjoint from test. On RadioML 2016.10a (5 seeds, 44k-frame held-out test set), FuseAMC reaches 55.8% overall accuracy, improving on the best cumulant-feature baseline by 5.1 points and on the CNN alone by 3.2 points (paired-bootstrap 95% confidence-interval lower bounds of 5.0 and 3.1 points, both positive), while matching the best classical baseline in its own strong high-SNR regime and the CNN in its strong low-SNR regime. With about 0.2 million parameters, a model footprint of a few megabytes, and roughly 3 MFLOPs per frame, the whole pipeline trains and runs on one CPU core, targeting general-purpose and embedded processors without hardware acceleration.
en
AI-Assisted Classification under Correlation Neglect and Trust
When does an AI assistant improve human decision-making, and when does it hurt? We argue that the answer depends not just on AI accuracy but also on how much its evidence overlaps with the human's and how the human combines the two. A worker makes a binary decision by observing her own signal and receiving a recommendation from an AI. We develop a human behavioral model with two primitives: her awareness of the overlap and her trust in the AI. Our analysis gives a closed-form phase diagram over AI capability and overlap, with regions of complementarity, impairment, and automation. A worker who neglects the overlap (correlation neglect) can be made less accurate by a more capable AI, double-counting the shared evidence. Trust reshapes the regions - undertrust may compensate for correlation neglect, so that the trust level maximizing accuracy depends on the deployment parameters. Empirically, we identify the two model parameters by pairing the same workers with different AIs, and break the accuracy loss into a correlation-neglect cost and an undertrust cost, one tied to reducing overlap on the AI side, the other to calibrating trust on the human side. On ChatBench, AI assistance raises accuracy by 21 points, yet workers apply only about a quarter of the Bayes-rational weight to AI information; GPT-4o falls in the automation region and Llama-3.1-8b stays at the complementarity boundary; and calibrating trust recovers about 2.6 points for GPT-4o but almost nothing for Llama-3.1-8b.
en
Aligning Language Models with General Preferences: An Empirical Study of Direct Nash Optimization
Direct Nash Optimization (DNO) aligns a language model to a general preference function by approximating the Nash equilibrium of a two-player preference game. Its practical variant, DNO-Prct, iterates on-policy sampling, LLM-based rating of the samples together with a teacher's gold response, large-margin preference-pair selection and a DPO-style contrastive update. We re-implement DNO-Prct independently and study it on two open-weight instruct models, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1, with GPT-4o or a larger open-weight model of the same family as the annotator. On AlpacaEval 2.0 with GPT-4o as judge, three iterations raise the length-controlled (LC) win rate against GPT-4o from 31.7% to 45.3% for Llama and from 6.8% to 18.4% for Mistral, and the tuned 8B model scores above Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on every reported win rate. With same-family open-weight annotators, the runs retain 62% (Llama) and 82% (Mistral) of the LC gain achieved with GPT-4o as annotator, so the rating step does not require a proprietary model. In a separate ablation configuration, variants that remove the gold responses, remove the data look-back, or accept only teacher-preferred pairs score 6 to 10 LC points below the full procedure, whereas varying the number of on-policy samples per prompt (1 to 7) moves the LC win rate by at most 2.1 points, and a margin sweep (1 to 5) run in its own pipeline by at most 2.4 points. We also report the cost of the pipeline and where the practical algorithm departs from the theory it approximates. All results are single runs, and GPT-4o is both the teacher and the evaluation judge; we discuss what this implies for the reported gains.
en
iGC: Antibody Optimization via Reinforcement Learning over a Learned Somatic Hypermutation Prior
Antibody affinity maturation is a natural optimization process in which B cells acquire mutations through somatic hypermutation (SHM), undergo selection for improved antigen binding, and iteratively evolve toward higher affinity. Computationally modeling this process requires capturing both biologically plausible mutations and antigen-specific selection. However, existing mutation models do not directly optimize binding, while affinity optimization often neglects realistic mutation trajectories. We introduce iGC (in silico Germinal Centers), a two-stage reinforcement learning (RL) framework for antigen-specific antibody optimization. Stage 1 learns an SHM mutation prior from parent-child pairs in B-cell lineage trees and adapts it to a target affinity-maturation dataset. Stage 2 initializes an RL policy from this prior and optimizes antigen binding with Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularization toward the frozen prior. To prevent reward exploitation, including repetitive high-reward substitutions and structurally tolerated framework mutations, we introduce a Reward-Tax Meta-Gradient objective. RewardNet smooths the affinity landscape, while TaxNet penalizes reward overexploitation, jointly defining a learned meta-reward for policy optimization. We evaluate iGC on mutation prediction, SHM consistency, affinity optimization, and mutation diversity. The mutation prior more than doubles the strongest baseline in mutation-site prediction. Following RL optimization, iGC maintains SHM sequence structure. It also achieves a strong exploration-exploitation balance, yielding competitive reward-diversity products across candidate-selection cutoffs. These results demonstrate that iGC integrates biologically plausible mutation generation with antigen-specific affinity selection, providing an in silico framework for iterative antibody affinity maturation.
en
Build a semantic layer for agentic AI with EDB Postgres AI and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
Learn how to build a governed semantic layer for agentic AI inside EDB Postgres AI and query it from a Strands Agents agent on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. Business meaning, join paths, and access control all live in Postgres, with GRANT and row-level security enforcing what each agent can read.
en
Midterm elections 2026: all the news
The 2026 midterm elections will determine the scope of President Donald Trump’s power in his final two years in office, and signal what voters care…
en
Evaluating LLMs as Judges of Counterspeech Quality Against Online Hate Speech
Prolonged exposure to hate speech on social media can cause lasting psychological distress among users. Counterspeech has emerged as an effective, non-censorial mitigation strategy, but its deployment requires rigorous quality assessment. Manual assessment is unscalable due to the large volume of content on the Web and imposes severe emotional strain on human annotators. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a scalable alternative, yet concerns remain regarding their reliability. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which LLMs can effectively perform this task. We test 12 open-weight LLMs of different sizes and families under zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting, to approximate pointwise and pairwise human expert assessment of counterspeech quality across four dimensions: relevance, coherence, aggressiveness, and suitableness. We find that (i) LLMs show low agreement and moderate rank correlations with human experts: our best configuration, Qwen 2.5 72B on coherence, achieves up to a linear-weighted Cohen's κ_l = 0.19 and Spearman's ρ= 0.42 in pointwise evaluation and an unweighted Cohen's κ= 0.25 in pairwise evaluation. (ii) Converting pointwise scores into pairwise labels substantially improves human--LLM agreement for selected configurations. For same-instance coherence, Qwen 2.5 72B under zero-shot prompting achieves κ= 0.35 with converted labels, compared with κ= 0.25 when judging pairs directly, and Mixtral 87B under few-shot prompting improves from κ= 0.07 to κ= 0.34. (iii) LLMs agree more with one another than with human experts, particularly in pairwise evaluation, where the strongest model pair, OLMo 2 32B and Llama 3.3 70B on coherence, reaches substantial agreement with κ= 0.76, whereas their agreement with the experts in the same configuration does not exceed κ= 0.21.
en
IntentGEO: Intent-aware Generative Engine Optimization for Recommendation
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape recommendations across chatbots, e-commerce, and user-generated content (UGC) platforms, creating demand for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to improve item visibility in generated responses. Existing GEO studies are mainly content-centric, optimizing visibility under general-purpose queries. However, a shared item description usually serves users with different needs and decision goals, resulting in its visibility gains being dependent on the request. To investigate how changing intent affects visibility, we formulate IntentGEO to evaluate shared rewrites across need specificity and decision progression. We revisit existing GEO methods and find that their visibility gains vary across user intents. More critically, learning-based prompt optimization can underperform its handwritten seed on average. Tracing these updates reveals prompt drift from explicit recommendation instructions toward generic promotional tactics. To address this drift, we propose AMO (Anchored Meta-Optimization), which preserves recommendation instructions in a fixed core while learning appended strategies from citation feedback. Across four domains and ten intent states, AMO improves average citation-rank gain by 35% over the strongest prior learning-based baseline and leads on nine states. Ablations show that learned additions improve on the fixed core alone and that AMO outperforms full-prompt optimization initialized from that core. It also achieves the highest gains in an agentic recommendation pipeline and, after separate adaptation, on Doubao, a commercially deployed, closed-source online assistant. These findings highlight user intent as a key dimension of GEO evaluation and support anchored adaptation across recommendation needs and decision stages.
en
Strategist: Evolving Reasoning with Agents
A model is only half of an AI agent system. The other half is the inference strategy: the reasoning procedure that turns model calls into a response. Today that second half is written by hand, and the experience of building one strategy never carries to the next. We introduce Strategist, a meta-agent that evolves inference strategies across tasks. Each strategy is written as a blueprint,executable code that other strategies can reuse, and together the blueprints form a library. Given a task and a small development set, Strategist retrieves related blueprints, writes candidate strategies, tests them on real samples, and revises them from the results. Every candidate then enters the library, so later tasks build on earlier discoveries. On 30 benchmarks, Strategist beats the strongest baseline on 24 and matches its average accuracy (74.7% vs.74.0%) at 39% lower inference cost. Its strategies also transfer to unseen tasks and other models without further search. The part of an AI system that is not improved on its own now does.
en
Build efficient agents with knowledge distillation on Amazon SageMaker AI
Agentic assistants built on frontier models run a multi-step tool loop, and paying frontier prices on every step is hard to sustain at production scale. This post shows how to use sequence-level knowledge distillation (SeqKD) to transfer a frontier teacher's agentic behavior into a small, lower-cost student on Amazon SageMaker AI.
en
Agentic engineering intelligence with Amazon Nova Multimodal Embeddings and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
Learn how to build a multi-agent engineering assistant that compresses aerospace component substitution evaluation from days to minutes, using Amazon Nova Multimodal Embeddings, Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, and the Strands Agents SDK to assemble substitution evidence while keeping the engineer as the decision-maker.
en
An Experimental Study of Hybrid Retrieval, NLI and Open-source LLMs for Scientific Claim Verification
Claim verification is the task of deciding whether a source text supports a claim, contradicts it, or lacks sufficient evidence. Natural Language Inference (NLI) models can judge whether a single sentence supports or contradicts a claim, but they struggle when the evidence is spread across several sentences. Conversely, Large Language Models (LLMs) can reason across sentences, but may draw conclusions the text does not support. In this experimental study, we test whether a conservative fusion rule, labeling a claim Support or Contradict only when both models agree and defaulting to Not Enough Evidence otherwise, combines their strengths. We construct a benchmark of 2,035 claims from SciFact and CliniFact (858 Support, 152 Contradict, 1,025 Not Enough Evidence). We retrieve the top five most relevant sentences per claim using a hybrid of semantic and lexical (BM25) retrieval, which slightly outperforms either method alone. These retrieved sentences are then provided to every verification model. We then compare a DeBERTa-v3-base-mnli-fever-anli NLI baseline against Llama 3.1 8B, Qwen3 8B, and Mistral 7B. Qwen3 achieves the highest Macro-F1 (0.7937), followed by Llama 3.1 (0.7204) and Mistral (0.6388), while the NLI baseline reaches only 0.3157. Contrary to our hypothesis, fusion degrades performance, dropping Macro-F1 to 0.7392, 0.6730, and 0.5991, respectively. To understand this decline, we analyze agreements, disagreements, and common error patterns between the NLI and LLM verifiers. Our error analysis shows that NLI and LLM disagreements often result in correct LLM predictions being overturned.
en
Geometry of Confabulation and Refusal in Small Language Models
Faced with an unanswerable question, small language models can either refuse or confabulate: confidently produce a wrong answer. Can the hidden state before the first generated token provide a clue? Can we flip confabulations into refusals? I introduce ConfabQA, a 784-item benchmark whose obscure-pre-cutoff category breaks the typical correctness/knowledge-cutoff confound and map the geometry of the hidden state with linear probes, a sparse autoencoder (SAE), and direct optimization of intervention directions. On Qwen3-1.7B and Gemma 2 2B the probe separates upcoming refusals from confabulations well beyond prompt features (+7.4/+16.3 pp); on Llama 3.2 3B the ConfabQA margin is within fold-to-fold spread, but a direct refusal probe on PopQA and TriviaQA recovers +18-25 pp. On Qwen I closely inspect three candidate directions for the refusal vector: probe-recovered, Qwen-Scope SAE feature, and directly optimized. Although the three directions are pairwise 50-81 degrees apart, a push at or below the state's own norm along any of them flips most confabulations into refusal openings dominated by the "As..." family. Forcing the opener without touching the hidden state yields the same one-in-three judged-refusal rate as any push. The opposite push collapses refusals mostly into confabulations, yet leaves originally correct answers intact, so the direction gates the opening speech act rather than the knowledge behind it. Confabulations do not resolve into a concentrated feature in a dictionary or a token signature on Qwen3-1.7B. Scoring every probe on the margin over the strongest of four prompt-feature baselines extracts the hidden state's own contribution. Correctness signal is model-dependent and portable only for Llama 3.2 3B: 81% of the probe's margin over test majority survives transfer between ConfabQA, PopQA, and TriviaQA. Benchmark, judge, and code are released.
en
LoRAForge: Co-Designing Post-Hoc Compression and Execution for Efficient Multi-LoRA Serving
Multi-LoRA serving allows many task-specific adapters to share a common base model, but scaling to large adapter fleets introduces substantial storage, loading, and execution overheads. Post-hoc compression can reduce the memory footprint of trained LoRA adapters, yet smaller ranks do not automatically translate into faster serving. For instance, padding, factor access, and generic kernels can obscure the retained low-rank structure, while independently recompressing thousands of modules also incurs significant preparation overhead. We present LoRAForge, a system connecting batched factor construction to rank-specialized execution through an explicit retained-rank representation. It supports two allocation policies: uniform retention ratios (LoRAForge-U) and spectral-energy budget allocation (LoRAForge-S). Both share FlashTSQR factor construction and the same serving backend. FlashTSQR exploits parallelism across modules and row tiles, accelerating factor construction by up to 2.28over matched library QR. In a fixed-work Qwen control, the shared runtime adds 1.17--1.22throughput across both compressed policies, with negligible gains on original adapters. Across 85 trained open-weighted Qwen and Llama adapters, the spectral policy's floored quality configuration retains about 7.7% of adapter parameters with fleet-average score drops of at most 1.2 points on a 0--100 scale. The same rank-floored 1/12 spectral exports achieve substantial token-throughput gains on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
en
Zero-Gated Cross-Attention
Injecting non-text modalities into frozen language models often introduces early optimization instability, making it difficult to separate architectural gains from transient training dynamics. We introduce Inductively Gated Cross-Attention (IGCA), a zero-initialized cross-attention bridge that preserves pretrained model behavior at initialization while enabling gradual multimodal conditioning. Integrated across six decoder layers of frozen Falcon-40B, open_llama_30b, and Bloom-7b1 backbones (with 40,404,961,288 trainable adapter parameters used during training), IGCA acts as an exact algebraic no-op at initialization with a maximum output discrepancy of 0.00e+00. Over 59,500 training steps on Falcon-40B, the training loss decreases from 3.9403 to 0.0007 (with final ten step losses of [0.0001, 0.0003, 0.0005, 0.0002, 0.0005, 0.0011, 0.0005, 0.0006, 0.0005, 0.0007]). On held-out evaluation, the best gate-on checkpoint achieves a loss of 2.2201 compared to 4.3469 for the gate-off baseline -- a 48.9% reduction (2.1268 nats) -- while average held-out loss improves from 4.3423 to 2.2498 (1.9075 nats) with a mean gate magnitude of {}(α){} = 0.0713.
en
I built an AI Tamagotchi before Meta could
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta made AI look so stinking cute by giving it a squishy little face - and this holiday season, he wants to sell…
en
Evolving Scientific Intelligence: From Fragmented Evidence to Distributed Experimental Loops
Scientific discovery advances when evidence from different investigations is brought into contact. Yet paper-centric communication leaves experimental results fragmented, delayed, or unreported, creating a "scientific memory wall" between growing computational capabilities and the evidence accessible to AI systems. We envision a different dynamic: in a network of intelligent laboratories, a failed or overlooked experiment in one domain could trigger a hypothesis in another, whose testing generates evidence that stimulates further investigations. Such chains of information collision and empirical validation could transform isolated discovery loops into a cumulative scientific process. We propose Evolving Scientific Intelligence (ESI), an architectural blueprint for enabling these evidence-driven chain reactions. ESI preserves experimental records in shared, computable scientific memory, where evidence from different domains can be recombined into testable hypotheses. It jointly selects candidates and evaluation methods according to scientific value, reliability, and cost, then coordinates physical tests across distributed experimental nodes. Their feedback revises hypotheses and evaluators, while slower meta-control reassesses research objectives and decision criteria to guard against self-reinforcing errors and misguided optimization. We call for an Information Manhattan Project to build the infrastructure for scientific intelligence that evolves through experimentally grounded chains of discovery.
en
AStockArena: Beyond Returns, Can We Entrust Real Capital to the Decisions of Financial Agents?
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in dynamic financial trading, yet real-time trading benchmarks mainly evaluate agents by cumulative returns and risk-adjusted performance. Such outcome metrics cannot show whether trades are faithfully reported, supported by available evidence, and consistent with account states. We introduce AStockArena, a real-time decision-auditing benchmark for continuous trading in China's A-share market. Under shared market conditions and execution constraints, we evaluate 13 open- and closed-source models over 3,198 sequential decisions. AStockArena reconstructsthe actions actually posted to accounts by aligning reports, trade requests, execution responses, and account states, and audits them with eight checks spanning execution traceability (O), evidence sufficiency (RK), and financial meta-awareness (B), combining record verification with consensus expert annotation. Of 1,070 trading points, 72.99% exhibit at least one audit gap; model-level rates range from52.2% to 91.2%, with evidence gaps most prevalent. Historical trade-filtering replay further shows thatportfolio outcomes are sensitive to these flagged trades. Decision-process auditing thus offers a verifiable complement to return-based evaluation of financial agents.
en
Efficient and Scalable Multi-View Masked Autoencoder for Heterogeneous Graph Self-Supervised Learning
Recent years have witnessed the flourishing of self-supervised learning on heterogeneous graphs, e.g., masked autoencoder-based methods. However, existing methods suffer from three issues, including the prohibitive computational cost of constructing meta-path-induced subgraphs, the limitations of uniform random masking, and the suboptimal objective of reconstructing potentially noisy or uninformative original node features. To address these issues, we propose the Multi-View Masked Auto Encoder (MVMAE), a novel, efficient, and scalable framework for heterogeneous graph self-supervised learning. First, MVMAE introduces a novel multi-view mask-then-reconstruct strategy. Instead of masking individual nodes or features, MVMAE randomly masks entire meta-path views and guides the model to reconstruct their representations from remaining visible views. This approach shifts the learning objective to a high-level and semantic task, providing a more robust and informative supervisory signal that is effective even when initial node features are absent or flawed. Then, to handle the computational demands, MVMAE employs an efficient offline aggregation mechanism that pre-computes and reuses representations for each meta-path view, completely avoiding the costly construction of meta-path-induced subgraphs. Next, to fuse the representations of each view, MVMAE uses a Transformer-based multi-view fusion encoder to capture the complex correlations between views, and a deliberately simple MLP decoder to compel the encoder to learn highly expressive and robust node representations. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets, including three large-scale graphs, demonstrate that MVMAE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art self-supervised and even semi-supervised baselines, confirming its superior effectiveness and scalability. Our source code is released at https://github.com/hcmdgh/MVMAE.
en