2481
209
Pair OpenCode, an open-source terminal-native AI coding agent, with open weight models on Amazon Bedrock to get a secure, flexible, pay-per-use coding assistant. Learn how to configure multi-model workflows, match the right model to each task, and keep your data in your own AWS account with no infrastructure to manage.
This work addresses continuous depression-severity score prediction from clinical interview transcripts under data scarcity. We propose a sequential low-rank adaptation (LoRA) protocol for cross-scale transfer: a Qwen3 backbone with a bounded regression head is first fine-tuned on the English DAIC-WOZ dataset (189 avatar-mediated sessions, PHQ-8), and the adapter then initializes fine-tuning on the Chinese PDCH dataset (100 real clinical consultations, HAMD-17), where a reinitialised, scale-specific head predicts the clinician-assigned score. All configurations use patient-level stratified 5-fold, 2-repeat cross-validation. On the data-scarce HAMD-17 target, the sequential protocol attains the best point-estimate MAE , RMSE, and macro-F_1 on both 0.6B and 1.7B backbones, outperforming target-only training and non-LLM baselines---4.96/6.59/0.36 with Qwen3-0.6B and 4.38/5.62/0.46 with Qwen3-1.7B. Ablations suggest that correctly aligned source supervision gives the best point estimates (unsupervised exposure and shuffled-label controls also show partial gains), that native-Chinese target input outperforms machine-translated English input, and that the reversed order yields no clear gain within run-to-run variance. The study is an exploratory, single-site internal evaluation: it does not establish screening or diagnostic utility, nor separately identify the contribution of the scale, language, or paradigm shifts. To our knowledge, no prior study evaluates this specific DAIC-WOZ-to-PDCH sequential transfer setting.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) supervises mathematical reasoning through final-answer correctness, but provides little guidance on individual tokens. On-policy distillation (OPD) supplies dense feedback on student-generated responses, yet teacher preference need not reflect correctness. Recent hybrids combine OPD and verifier-derived advantages or reweight task credit using teacher ratios. However, teacher guidance enters after verifier-based group normalization, and token reweighting need not preserve the total task credit assigned to each response. We introduce Unified Entropy-Calibrated Credit Redistribution for GRPO (UECR-GRPO), which integrates verifier and teacher signals within a single GRPO-style update at both the response and token levels. Path-Utility Unification (PUU) combines verifier reward and a teacher-to-anchor path log-ratio in a single KL-regularized objective. Its on-policy implementation uses a length-normalized teacher score and combines both rewards before group normalization and PPO clipping, allowing teacher evidence to influence the response ranking. Entropy-Calibrated Redistribution (ECR) then uses the signed teacher--old-policy token gap to redistribute the verifier-derived component. Full-vocabulary teacher entropy attenuates uncertain guidance, while a response-wise zero-sum projection preserves the total task credit and its token-wise sign before clipping. Across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, UECR-GRPO achieves average (Avg@12) accuracies of 17.21\% and 65.09\% with Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B students, respectively, exceeding the strongest baseline at each scale by 0.89 and 0.56 percentage points.
Humanoid control, leveraging human demonstrations, has achieved diverse, agile, and natural locomotion behaviors through reinforcement learning (RL). While this paradigm has yielded remarkable performance in physical humanoid control, how to eliminate specific motions from learned policies remains insufficiently explored. Addressing this issue is motivated by pressing safety and privacy concerns: the removal of malicious, poisoned, or suboptimal motions, as well as copyright-protected motions subject to the right to be forgotten under regulations such as the GDPR, is of critical importance. To this end, we propose {ForgetMimic}, the first motion-level unlearning method designed specifically for physical-world humanoid control. The core idea of ForgetMimic is as follows: given a policy π_θ trained on N motions, our method degrades performance on a target subset of K motions while preserving the effectiveness of the remaining N-K motions. Furthermore, we identify and resolve two key training mechanisms in robot control that lead to unlearning failure. We conduct extensive experiments on the Unitree G1 and H2 humanoid robots across 12 motions, including Dance, Fight, Flip, and others. Experimental results demonstrate that ForgetMimic effectively eliminates memory of designated motions while maintaining the normal operation of all other motions.
The report suggests that greater exposure will not resolve the unease around the technology, nor reduce public support for AI regulation.
Control barrier functions (CBF) are a popular safety filter to ensure safety for nonlinear dynamical systems. However, when the system is subject to uncertainties and disturbances, this requires the use of robust variants of CBFs, which can be difficult to construct and can be overly conservative, especially for high-dimensional systems under input constraints. In this work, we propose a new approach to solve these challenges by introducing Least-Effort Adversarial Potentials (LEAP), a certificate that quantifies the robustness of a given state against disturbances in terms of the effort required by the disturbance to cause failure. We show that LEAP is a CBF for the undisturbed system, but can also be used to construct a safety filter that is robust to disturbances whose cumulative effort is bounded. We propose a method for constructing LEAPs with on-policy deep reinforcement learning. Next, we demonstrate LEAPs in simulation on a variety of multi-agent systems with disturbances and uncertainties. Finally, hardware experiments on a quadruped and quadrotors validate that LEAPs are well suited to tackle the disturbances and uncertainties from real-world robotic systems.
Audio-language models (ALMs) integrate acoustic perception with the knowledge encoded in language models, enabling contextual understanding of auditory events. Making these capabilities practical on devices with limited memory and computation motivates our focus on small ALMs with fewer than 200M parameters. We introduce a recipe that brings together architecture, data, and three-stage training to build Mizar, a 159.3M-parameter ALM. Its architecture connects a compact CED-Small audio encoder to SmolLM2-135M through a frequency-merging mapper. With supervision drawn from ReasonAQA, AudioMCQ, and AVQA, the model undergoes three training stages: audio-language alignment (Stage 1), audio-dependent fine-tuning (Stage 2), and post-training (Stage 3) aimed at strengthening weak skills while retaining learned capabilities. Across five random seeds, Mizar achieves mean accuracies of 52.92% on MMAU, 42.42% on MMAR, and 36.02% on ADQA-clean, surpassing the previous best-performing ALM below 200M parameters on all three benchmarks. It also supports local inference on a single CPU: on questions from the MMAU benchmark, the mean latency from opening the audio file to generating a complete answer is 1.09 seconds. Code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/KaiyangLi1992/Mizar_159M.
Claims about AI safety reach audiences well beyond the AI community, yet many rely on opaque evidence or static assessments, when supporting evidence is accessible at all. We present the Systemic Risk Index, an open evaluation pipeline and dashboard built to make empirical evidence more transparent and traceable to the public. Our work organizes 19 public benchmarks into four systemic-risk categories defined by the EU GPAI Code of Practice---CBRN, cyber offense, harmful manipulation, and loss of control---and evaluates models using harm-preserving perturbations and simulated deployment contexts. The interactive dashboard lets users alternate between average and worst-case aggregation, vary how model capability affects the aggregate score, and trace each risk rating to its benchmark evidence. Across 18 models, scores fall by 14 to 37 points under worst-case aggregation, highlighting information that can be hidden by an average assessment of model risk. LLM judges show agreement with human graders comparable to human--human agreement (κ= 0.78--0.82), and a blind audit finds that 83\% of sampled transformations preserve the original harm. In a survey (N = 21), most participants report that scores are easy to understand and that the dashboard encouraged them to view model evaluations under different settings
State tracking from sequential observations can require both retaining information and updating it by composing observed operations. We extend Mamba-3's diagonal transition with an input-dependent low-rank reflection term to support noncommutative state tracking, in which the order of operations matters. The rank-one update couples state coordinates along an input-dependent direction, enabling non-diagonal state transitions within a single Mamba-3 block. The extension preserves Mamba-3's exponential-trapezoidal discretization, rotary embeddings (RoPE), and readout. For training, we adapt chunkwise computation to parallelize the proposed recurrence within each chunk. Experiments cover group word problems with discrete inputs and a shell game with continuous observations, in which a policy is trained by behavioral cloning. Among the models selected for their strong performance under fixed timing, the proposed model maintains higher tracking success on longer swap sequences in the shell game with continuous observations and timing jitter. These experiments show that the proposed method achieves high accuracy on the evaluated non-commutative tracking tasks, improving on standard Mamba-3. The extension thus offers a Mamba-3-based approach to non-commutative state tracking.
The growth of large language model (LLM) inference and search services increases the scale of online linear programming problems, motivating computationally efficient algorithms. We develop resource-adaptive stochastic gradient descent (RASGD) for stochastic online linear programming. The algorithm uses one request and current inventory to update resource prices, requiring O(m) operations for m resources and memory per arrival and no LP or sample-average optimization. The central idea is to express the current-resource pricing logic of re-solving through a first-order SGD update: each arrival refreshes the remaining-inventory allowance in the dual objective, while the stepsize decreases for early learning and increases later to match the speed of inventory adjustment. Under standard non-degeneracy conditions, our algorithm is feasible on every sample path and achieves O(T) expected regret against the realized fractional hindsight optimum, which matches the lower bound, even for policies that know the distribution and have unrestricted computation. The analysis converts curvature around the fixed reference price into inventory stability without tracking optimal prices at changing resource levels. Numerical experiments show that RASGD achieves regret competitive with per-arrival LP re-solving and improves upon the tested first-order baselines, while retaining the computational efficiency of first-order methods. These results establish RASGD as a computationally efficient approach to achieving high allocation quality in large-scale OLP.
Deploying deep learning models on edge CPUs is bottlenecked by computational and memory constraints. Mixed-precision quantization promises to reduce inference latency while preserving accuracy. However, quantization affects different layer types in inconsistent ways, so identifying where accuracy loss is minimized and latency reduction is maximized is critical, as the effect accumulates over a full deployment into substantial savings or unacceptable task degradation. Such identification relies on sensitivity metrics, proxies that estimate layer-wise degradation without evaluating the task accuracy of every candidate policy. Nevertheless, widely used metrics fail systematically on modern architectures. We present a systematic empirical study of 13 sensitivity metrics for layer-wise INT8 quantization across four distinctly different neural networks, and validate the resulting policies on two ARM64 platforms. Gradient-based sensitivity methods fail on 4 out of 8 model-hardware configurations and weight-based statistics on 2. In contrast, the Jensen-Shannon Divergence achieves zero catastrophic failures, reliably isolating the layers that cannot be safely quantized. A sensitivity metric alone does not define a policy, and the fixed thresholds typically used for that step are fragile over the highly skewed distributions of modern architectures. We address this with K-Means clustering, achieving near-lossless accuracy and a mean speed-up of 1.81over the full-precision model. Finally, we reveal that excluding from quantization the layers whose speed-up is negligible, regardless of their sensitivity, can be counterproductive, as it induces computational graph fragmentation and disables operator fusion. Our results yield concrete allocation policies for practitioners and researchers deploying quantized vision models on heterogeneous edge CPUs, without GPU access or gradient computation.
Robotic assembly in high-mixture settings requires adaptable systems that can handle diverse parts, yet current approaches typically rely on policies specialized to each insertion task. Although this can reach high success rates, it makes the process of deploying systems for new problems tedious and time consuming. We present a framework for generalizable insertion using world models that combine robot proprioceptive information with raw visual observations captured by a wrist-mounted camera. Our model-based approach trains a single world model on up to 90 insertion tasks with geometrically diverse parts, achieving 56% zero-shot success on unseen objects with unknown geometry compared to just 7% with a model-free baseline. Importantly, performance improves as more objects are included in the training dataset, demonstrating strong scalability. Lastly, finetuning the generalist model on held-out objects significantly enhances data-efficiency compared to training from scratch and, in some cases, achieves better asymptotic performance. To our knowledge, this is the first system capable of assembling unseen objects in an entirely data-driven manner, and thus represents a significant step toward scalable, generalizable robotic assembly systems.
Vision-Language-Action models provide a strong foundation for general-purpose robot control, yet a vast majority of policies do not preserve and leverage episode-level information beyond the current observation. This limitation is consequential in history-dependent manipulation tasks that depend on information available only in past observations. Retaining past observations in context can aid in recovering this information, but at the significant cost of ever-growing, bloated context and inference latency. We thus introduce MemBodied, a fixed-size episodic memory with two complementary components: an associative state that records interactions across policy calls and an episode anchor that preserves a compact representation of the initial scene as a reference. At each policy call, the model conditions action generation on the current input and the memory components, rather than directly using past observations. Across five evaluated RMBench tasks requiring memory, MemBodied achieves 7.81the mean success rate of a stateless policy and 2.98of vanilla recurrent memory, while outperforming the strongest memory-augmented baseline by 1.3with 10fewer added parameters. On the fully observable LIBERO-Long suite, it reached 90.6%, a 5.4% improvement over the stateless π_0 policy. These findings support MemBodied as a practical alternative to expanding the policy context for history-dependent manipulation.
Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce an exciting new paradigm for planning and navigation in robotics, but fail on even simple multi-robot tasks as team sizes grow. We propose COMPASS, a scalable, decentralized multi-robot architecture for controlling large collectives of agentic robots with reasoning space feedback control. Feedback is generated locally on each robot by a spatial transformer which aggregates multi-hop messages across the fleet into a learned feedback token. Our experiments find that collectives of language models demonstrate performance gains from structured diversity of the input command, which can cancel biases; an advantage that is held across scale. Compared against a centralized frontier LLM policy and a language-only communication ablation, we find that the coupled design of COMPASS decisively produces cohesive flocking formations that accurately fly the commanded intent. We show that reasoning feedback works best when composed with a compact learned token. Our ablations show that hand engineered feedback with raw state appearing in the language channel obliterates cohesion. COMPASS generalizes zero-shot to unseen instructions of ambiguous meaning while commanding flocks up to 16 times its training scale, flying up to 1024 robots under natural language commands.
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in creative text generation, yet their ability to produce culturally grounded and stylistically constrained literary forms remains underexplored. Prior work has focused largely on modern language varieties and poetry, while classical prose traditions such as maqama remain largely unstudied. The maqama is a classical literary genre characterized by rhymed prose (saj), dense rhetorical ornamentation, and episodic narrative structure, making it a challenging testbed for evaluating whether LLMs can move beyond surface fluency toward deeper literary competence. In this paper, we present the first controlled evaluation study of maqama generation with LLMs, comparing five models under zero-shot, few-shot, and rule-based prompting, and evaluating outputs through both human annotation and an LLM-as-a-judge framework across dimensions such as rhetorical richness, saj density, structural coherence, and stylistic authenticity. Our results show that prompting strategy plays a strong role in stylistic quality: few-shot prompting most consistently improves saj density, while its effects on rhetoric and coherence vary by model, with the strongest models (GPT-4o and GPT-5.4-mini) benefiting most from rule-based prompting on these dimensions, though zero-shot prompting yields the highest aggregate scores across all five models. We further observe systematic differences between models in stylistic alignment with Arabic maqama conventions, and corroborate our findings with a second independent LLM judge, paired statistical significance testing, and non-LLM proxy measures of saj.
Agentic engineering systems can edit repositories, run tools and tests, build firmware, synthesize schematics, and prepare deployable or manufacturable artifacts. The assurance problem is therefore shifting from whether an agent can produce an output to whether an engineering lifecycle is justified in acting on claims about that output. Current products and standards provide sandboxes, approvals, hooks, traces, policy enforcement, attestations, bills of materials, and assurance representations, but these capabilities remain fragmented. This paper presents the Agile-V Assurance Spine, a cross-domain transition contract for software, firmware, and PCB engineering. Evidence is admitted only when it establishes required properties through an authoritative source profile, is bound to the exact artifact and frozen policy baseline, remains current with respect to declared dependencies, and satisfies risk-appropriate independence and authority. Gate decisions are recorded as receipts; approvals and exceptions are exact-scope and time-bounded; and authorization is rechecked at the effect boundary before merge, deployment, flashing, release, or fabrication. A bounded review of contemporary research, commercial platforms, open-source infrastructure, and standards positions the model relative to evidence-gated lifecycle control, continuous assurance, runtime admission, provenance, and AI/ML inventories. The paper contributes a precise vocabulary, compositional architecture, domain profiles, mapping to open-source implementations, and an adversarial evaluation agenda. It does not claim regulatory conformity or demonstrated production superiority.
Long physiological recordings contain many routine measurements, while predictive information is often concentrated in rare events, sustained burden, and recurring temporal patterns. Masked autoencoding recovers measurements; contrastive learning aligns views. We study self-supervision that explicitly prioritizes structured signal evidence. We introduce transferable evidence reconstruction (TER), which constructs evidence from unlabeled recordings, fits a fresh low-capacity reader on one recording group, and requires that reader to recover the same evidence in another group without refitting. Differentiating through this cross-group test learns representations with transferable evidence-decoding rules; the evidence guides self-supervision but is not used as a downstream feature. For continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), an observation-aware daily encoder and clock-aware multi-day memory bind glucose level and change to recorded time while organizing up to seven days of history. On the 14-task leaderboard, TER improves the strongest prior overall PR-AUC/ROC-AUC/Macro-F1 scores by 5.51/4.43/2.80 percentage points and sets a new best metric on 12/14 tasks. These leaderboard gains are 2.0-2.9 times the respective gaps between the two strongest baselines. With public pretraining data, folds, and the linear probe matched, TER outperforms our GlucoFM reproduction by 6.09/5.52/2.72 points. Target-reader ablations, same-history controls, and cross-person readouts support the combination of structured evidence, cross-group reader fitting, and learned multi-day organization.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents that alter real-world states, ensuring operational safety across multi-step workflows has become a critical challenge. While recent work has moved beyond single-turn evaluation toward multi-turn paradigms, key limitations persist: step-level methods treat actions in isolation, missing how risks accumulate, while trajectory-level evaluations operate post-hoc, offering no opportunity for timely intervention. To address these limitations, we formalize Decoupled Proactive Safety Monitoring along three dimensions: whether to intervene, when to intervene, and what the risk is. We introduce PASTABench, a benchmark of 1,139 multi-turn trajectories spanning 5 risk categories and 13 subcategories. We further propose the Optimal Intervention Window (OIW), anchored by annotated Earliest-Signal and Trigger turns, to quantify intervention timeliness. Evaluation of 16 LLMs reveals that proactive intervention remains largely unsolved, with the best model achieving only 40.74% optimal-timing interventions. Fine-grained diagnosis further uncovers pervasive lexical overfitting: competitive safety scores of smaller models mask keyword hypersensitivity rather than genuine risk comprehension, as their proactive capability largely collapses once hazard vocabulary is neutralized.
Effective summarization of interrogative dialogues is a critical task in forensic and investigative settings, requiring high factual accuracy, coherence, and attribute-specific relevance. In this work, we introduce CASPER, a novel Chain-of-Thought Attribute-Specific Prompting for Evaluative Summarization framework that leverages structured prompting and iterative refinement to generate high-quality summaries of interrogator-witness interactions. We construct MINDSum, a dataset extending the MIND corpus, comprising 6,000 utterance pairs annotated with event details, factual statements, character descriptions, and fillers. CASPER employs RoleEval, a hierarchical evaluation mechanism where multiple roles (officer, inspector, senior inspector) iteratively assess summaries based on predefined criteria. By integrating entity extraction and structured feedback loops, CASPER significantly improves factual consistency and contextual completeness compared to existing baselines. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework outperforms standard summarization models on both lexical (ROUGE) and semantic (BERTScore) metrics, while human evaluation confirms its alignment with expert reasoning. Our findings underscore the potential of controlled summarization in high-stakes domains, paving the way for AI-driven forensic intelligence.
Small and medium-sized language models offer cost-effective executors for tool-using agents, making them attractive for local and large-scale deployment. However, in long-horizon and stateful environments, they often make structural errors such as missing required observations, performing premature writes, repeating failed calls, and violating action preconditions. These errors can lead to incorrect state updates, policy violations, and costly or irreversible consequences, making reliable tool execution a critical deployment challenge. Existing fine-tuning approaches require substantial data and computation, while flat memory may retrieve failed actions without preserving their causal context or safety conditions. In this paper, we propose FRESH, a Failure-aware Retrieval framework over Experience-Structured Heterogeneous graphs, which transforms historical successes and failures into structured external experience for tool-using agents. By explicitly modeling the dependencies among tasks, actions, errors, repairs, and execution conditions, FRESH helps frozen language models reuse reliable strategies, avoid recurring failures, and make safer decisions in stateful tool interactions. Experiments on τ-Bench and AppWorld with multiple open-source models show that FRESH consistently improves task success and tool-use reliability over no-memory agents and representative memory-based baselines.
