overfeed.news
Anuncio

Privum

Construimos, protegemos y operamos tu infraestructura digital.

Software, sistemas de IA, pruebas de penetración y nube segura para empresas.

Hablar con Privum

Tema

Seguridad y regulación

2481documentos

209últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

TokenCast: Forecasting Token Consumption During LLM Agent Execution

When a large language model (LLM) agent executes the same task, token consumption can vary by over an order of magnitude across runs. The agent chooses its next steps based on tool feedback and intermediate results, while the growing context steadily inflates the input size of every subsequent call. The total consumption of a task is therefore hard to predict before execution and the prediction must be revised as the run unfolds. In this paper, we propose TokenCast, which learns a composable cost representation for each execution segment, recording its own consumption and the context growth it introduces. Composing adjacent segments yields a cumulative estimate that captures the extra input cost incurred when context from earlier segments is re-read by every later call. As execution unfolds, newly observed evidence refreshes the forecast, requiring no additional LLM calls and incurring a mean cumulative prediction time of 32.8 ms per run on SWE-bench Verified. Across 4 task suites and 6 agent models, TokenCast's mean absolute error reduction against the strongest comparator averages 14.5% over 96 evaluated combinations. In offline budget-control replay, TokenCast uses 21.3% fewer tokens on average than a fixed-budget policy at matched trace completion. The code is available at https://github.com/DEFENSE-SEU/TokenCast.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Towards Communication-Efficient Social Intelligence in Language Agents

Socially intelligent language agents must negotiate, coordinate, and resolve conflicting preferences while respecting the time and attention of both participants. Balancing these demands is challenging because agents must convey enough to address a partner's constraints and advance their goals without adding words that do not help the interaction. In this paper, we propose Teacher-Assisted Communication Training (TACT) to improve social goal attainment while reducing communication cost, making interactions with agents more productive and less demanding. We first characterize communication efficiency in terms of action strategy and expression, whose effects extend beyond the current utterance to the partner's response and subsequent exchanges. We design TACT to revise student-generated actions, test the revisions through partner responses, and distill useful feedback into the student. An expression specialist removes unnecessary detail while preserving the intended action, while a strategy specialist proposes alternatives that may better address the partner's constraints. To determine which revision helps, TACT samples a partner response for each candidate and selects a teacher reference by balancing local goal support against action-token cost. That reference guides on-policy distillation on the student's own generation prefixes, allowing the student to act independently at deployment. We evaluate TACT on SOTOPIA and AgentSense. On SOTOPIA, it achieves the highest Goal among the evaluated methods on All and Hard while using substantially fewer target tokens than SFT+SDPO. On AgentSense, it improves goal success over the initial student while reducing target tokens and interaction messages.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Shockingly Simple Self-retrospection Improves Agentic Models Without RL

People learn not only by repeating successful actions, but also by recounting and explaining their experiences, revising their understanding to guide future behavior. Can a language-model agent improve its future actions by training only on explanations of its own experience? We investigate this question by studying Retrospection-Only Fine-Tuning (ROFT), a minimal online procedure designed to isolate the effect of explanation-only training on subsequent behavior. The agent attempts a task, observes available feedback, generates a retrospective explanation, and is fine-tuned with a next-token prediction loss on the explanation tokens alone. The procedure uses neither an external teacher nor a reward-based policy update. In software-engineering experiments with Qwen3.5-4B, ROFT is trained on problems with mixed successful and unsuccessful base-model attempts. On held-out SWE-bench Verified and Pro, it reaches 49.2% and 26.8% solve rates after 20 updates without using a verifier, compared with GRPO's 48.0% and 25.3% after 40 updates in the evaluated runs, and makes faster early progress in training time and sampled attempts. It also learns to solve individual tasks on which all 64 sampled base-model attempts failed, showing that learning can begin without any initially successful trajectories. Behavioral analyses find that ROFT indirectly assigns credit to actions, encouraging good actions and discouraging incorrect ones. Moreover, prompting retrospections to emphasize more direct solutions yields shorter subsequent attempts even without an explicit length penalty. Together, these findings show that learning to explain can also improve learning to do, establishing self-generated retrospections as useful training targets and motivating further study of explanation-to-action transfer.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Harness Learning Enables Generalizable Test-Time Adaptation

A language-model agent is jointly defined by its model and its harness, the executable program that organizes model calls, tool use, and information flow. Because different tasks call for different ways of organizing these operations, the harness needs to be adapted using feedback from the task at hand. We introduce harness learning, which trains a proposer model to revise a solver's harness using execution feedback. We formulate this process as meta-learning over executable programs, with harness revisions playing the role of weight updates in gradient-based adaptation. We train the proposer with reinforcement learning, using the task performance of revised harnesses as the reward. At test time, the proposer uses feedback from successive executions on a new task to refine the harness, without performing any parameter-space update. Experiments on reasoning and multi-hop question answering show that harness learning improves revision quality and that the ability to adapt at test time transfers to unseen tasks. Policies trained on individual revisions can continue improving harnesses over multiple rounds, while the benefits of training on revision sequences vary across settings. These findings suggest a path towards continually learning agents that turn accumulated experience into generalizable improvements.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models

Tool-using agents can fail twice: a required tool can fail, and the agent can then report success without the evidence needed to justify it. Existing benchmarks often entangle this reporting failure with tool selection, recovery, and environment dynamics. We introduce Failure-Transparent Agents (FTA), a controlled benchmark that fixes the failed observation and required evidence state before generation, making post-failure claims directly auditable. FTA contains 100 tasks with deterministic failure traces spanning five failure families, a neutral control, and four user-pressure conditions, and evaluates unsupported claims alongside useful recovery. Across six models, three response policies, and 3,600 human-annotated responses, false-success rates are 22.8% under the baseline policy, 9.3% with a transparency instruction, and 0.8% with a structured evidence contract. Fabricated-detail rates decrease from 28.3% to 14.3% and 0.8%, while useful responses increase from 74.9% to 89.2% and 98.8%, respectively. The tested evidence-contract policy is associated with substantially lower post-failure reporting errors while useful-response rates remain high within this blocked-task benchmark.

en
arXiv AI Papers

X-Reset: Scaling Object-Centric Reinforcement Learning via Cross-Embodiment Resets

Reinforcement learning (RL) in simulation can train dexterous manipulation policies without robot demonstrations, but training a single generalist policy with task-agnostic rewards faces a severe exploration problem: approaching, grasping, and reorienting diverse objects with many degrees of freedom is difficult to discover from scratch. Prior works make exploration tractable with high-quality robot demonstrations, per-task reward shaping, or by restricting policies to narrow modes of behavior. We propose X-Reset, a framework that instead resolves exploration with human hand-object demonstrations. Rather than imitating or tracking retargeted human motion, X-Reset kinematically retargets hand-object states to noisy robot states, filters out states that are unstable in simulation, and samples the remainder as resets during RL training with general-purpose object-centric rewards. The resulting policy depends only on object state and goal, with demonstrations entering training through the reset distribution. We show that X-Reset trains generalist policies on 20 objects across three embodiments---a 22-DoF hand on two different arms and a parallel-jaw gripper---and resolves the exploration challenges of RL from scratch. X-Reset scales with the number of training objects, generalizes to unseen objects, can learn from imperfect hand-pose estimates, and transfers behaviors zero-shot from sim-to-real.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Provable Benefits of Regularization: Fast Rates for Adversarial Imitation Learning

We study adversarial imitation learning (AIL), in which an agent learns to imitate expert demonstrations by optimizing a policy against an adversarial reward that distinguishes expert and learner behavior. Historically, reward regularization and entropy-based policy regularization are key components of empirically successful methods such as GAIL and LS-IQ, yet their finite-sample benefits remain underexplored. We establish fast rates for jointly regularized AIL in finite-horizon Markov decision processes with general function approximation. Our model-free algorithm, Dually Regularized AIL, combines KL policy regularization with a quadratic reward penalty weighted by expert and learner occupancies. With K online episodes and N expert trajectories, we prove a {O}({1}{K}+{1}{N}) bound on the regularized imitation gap for fixed regularization parameters. Our analysis combines an online mirror descent construction for general convex reward classes to control estimation error from finite expert data and stochastic learner feedback, with a sharp analysis of optimistic KL-regularized policy learning. To the best of our knowledge, Dually Regularized AIL is the first algorithm to simultaneously achieve {O}({1}ε) sample complexity in both expert demonstrations and online interactions for this regularized AIL objective, even with stochastic experts. These results provide a rigorous characterization of the complementary statistical benefits of reward and policy regularization in AIL.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Models

Aligning large language models (LLMs) to diverse user preferences is fundamentally hindered by standard alignment paradigms that optimize for monolithic users. In this work, empirical studies are first used to reveal the existence of a massive, untapped performance headroom for personalized generation through test-time alignment. We demonstrate that personalized generation is uniquely suited for test-time scaling methods like Best-of-N (BoN) because it can be viewed primarily as a candidate matching problem rather than a generator capability bottleneck. While reward models could in principle exploit this headroom, they are poorly calibrated for personalization, and their billion-parameter scale makes scoring large candidate pools prohibitively expensive. To overcome this limitation, we propose a parameter-efficient framework utilizing million-parameter scale multi-layer perceptron (MLP) ranking models. Our personalized ranking model directly reuses the internal embeddings of the base generator with minimal overhead. By scaling train-time data to provide fine-grained personalized preferences, this million-parameter ranking model accurately scores large candidate pools and can seamlessly guide generation to reduce the cost of materializing N candidates. Extensive experiments on nine datasets spanning three personalized generation settings show that our personalized ranking model effectively exploits the discovered headroom, outperforming billion-parameter generalist reward models on every dataset, with under 0.4% of their parameters and four orders of magnitude lower scoring latency.

en
arXiv AI Papers

QuanReview: Offline, Auditable Reconciliation of Human and LLM Span Annotations

Structured span annotations, such as quantities with their units, uncertainty modifiers, and event classes, are expensive to create and hard to keep trustworthy once language models enter the loop. We present QuanReview, an open-source system for auditing and correcting such annotation layers. QuanReview aligns two annotation streams over the same documents at character level, resolves unambiguous cases by an explicit and logged policy, and routes candidate conflicts to a browser-based adjudication interface where reviewers accept either side, build field-level hybrids, or flag items for re-annotation. A campaign manager assigns documents to multiple annotators with configurable redundancy, computes agreement at document and span level, auto-merges unanimous documents, and exports the corrected layer in the original file format, so that it can replace the original annotation files directly. Applied to a 4,457-record humanitarian benchmark and an LLM extraction stream, the system fully auto-merged 8% of documents, applied automatic policy decisions to a further 1,513 records, and concentrated human attention on 3,131 candidate conflicts, a mean of 5.4 per reviewed document.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Verifier Errors in RLVR: Reward Hacking, Limits of Feedback, and Selective Control

In reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), imperfect verifiers can reward incorrect responses, creating opportunities for reward hacking. Using gradient flow with a fixed verifier, we characterize the conditions under which reward rises while correctness falls. We then show that the observations available during RLVR are, in general, insufficient to detect or identify accepted errors, or to guarantee their reduction without sacrificing correct responses. To address this limit, we construct a correction using additional feedback about correctness from audits. This correction achieves selective control: at the current policy, it lowers the probability of accepted errors and raises that of correct responses, provided it outweighs the pressure toward errors from verifier reward. Experiments with log linear and neural contextual bandits and with a language model support the analysis and show that selective control under partial auditing reduces accepted errors while increasing correctness.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Rubric Rewards from Item Response Theory

Many language tasks have no single answer that can be checked automatically. Rubrics provide criteria for judging responses to these tasks. For reinforcement learning, the resulting verdicts must be combined into a scalar reward. A common approach sums the points assigned to satisfied criteria. Distinct verdict patterns can thus receive the same reward, and the fixed points encode how much each criterion should count, not how strongly its verdict distinguishes the current rollouts. Beyond this aggregation problem, judging the full rubric needs more judge requests as the criterion count grows. To address these limitations, Rubric Response Theory (RRT) measures quality and selects criteria when rubric criteria are monotone indicators of a shared target. Rather than adding assigned points, RRT uses a two parameter item response model that treats the verdict pattern as evidence about scalar quality specific to the rubric. Under this model, its likelihood score maximizes the local signal-to-noise ratio for quality. Its Response Parameter Network (RPN) reads the prompt and criterion text to predict criterion difficulty and discrimination. As the policy distribution changes during training, RRT uses online expectation maximization to update the RPN from current rollout verdicts. With Qwen3.5-4B as the policy, RRT's macro criterion score across Medical, Science, Rubrics as Rewards Science, and RubricBench is 1.7 points above that of group relative policy optimization (GRPO). On hard and very hard criteria in Medical and Science, RRT gains 2.8 to 5.6 points over GRPO. At half the criterion budget, adaptive Fisher selection with a frozen RPN keeps the macro criterion score across four datasets within 0.1 points of GRPO with full judging. These results show RRT can reduce judge requests while remaining competitive with GRPO.

en