overfeed.news
Anuncio

Agendator

Reservas online gratis para tu barbería o salón.

Página de reservas, agenda y recordatorios por email. Sin cookies ni anuncios para tus clientes.

Crear mi página gratis

Tema

LLMs

3024documentos

265últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

Multi-Dimensional Prosody Judgment For Live Streaming Speech Synthesis

Evaluating live streaming speech synthesis (TTS) requires assessing fine-grained, highly expressive prosody such as emotion, intonation, and energy which traditional MOS predictors fail to capture. While proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) like Gemini can evaluate these aspects, they are too costly for massive inference and reinforcement learning feedback. To address this, we first introduce Live-ProsodyJudge (LPJ), a cost-effective pairwise evaluator distilled from Gemini into Qwen3-Omni. However, we identify a critical flaw in standard multi-dimensional evaluation: verdict coupling. The judge tends to lazily align all individual dimension scores with its overall preference, collapsing a rich multi-dimensional rubric into a single preference bit. To resolve this, we further propose Decoupled-Live-ProsodyJudge (D-LPJ). D-LPJ eliminates the overall verdict target to prevent blind following, masks uncertain pair-dimensions during Supervised Fine-Tuning(SFT), and introduces a novel span-local GRPO strategy that applies normalized advantages strictly to their corresponding rationale spans. Evaluated on highly curated human-annotated test sets, 10 sample balanced-order LPJ achieves higher point accuracy than a single Gemini call, while D-LPJ successfully produces independent,decoupled dimension judgments. Furthermore, in a Best-of-8 TTS candidate selection tournament, the LPJ-selected utterance falls within the human top-3 in 85.29% of high-confidence cases, demonstrating its efficacy for fine-grained TTS preference optimization.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Perception, Layout, and Validation: Calibrated Confidence for Reliable Straight-Through Processing of Financial Documents

Straight-through processing (STP) on extracted key-value fields from financial documents without human review requires a calibrated probability together with a bounded guarantee on the residual error of the auto-approved tier. The emergence of modern Vision Language Models (VLMs) provides an out-of-the-box capability for extracting the key-values, but their verbalized confidence signals are unreliable and weakly track field correctness. This paper introduces a decomposed confidence layer along three interpretable channels, including perception, layout, and validation. Together with a final conformal risk control, the score can be used for reliable STP of financial documents. The method is validated on three public datasets covering real invoices, synthetic invoices, and ad-buy forms, using two different VLM families (Qwen3.6-27B and Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite). Our decomposed score consistently improves the separation of correct from incorrect extractions, substantially raising the AUROC from 0.54-0.74 for VLM verbalized signals to 0.90-0.99 with contributions from all three designed channels. Crucially for industrial deployment, this enables usable STP. The native VLM confidence signals could clear only 0.1%-7.0% of fields under risk control at a target error of <10%. In contrast, the proposed method auto-approves 49-72% of fields while holding the empirical error of the accepted tier at or below the target.

en
arXiv AI Papers

MATCH: Model-Aware Tool Learning with Curriculum Scheduling and Hierarchically Gated Rewards

Tool learning enables large language models (LLMs) to use external tools for tasks beyond parametric knowledge. Reinforcement learning can optimize tool-call behavior from feedback, but current methods still face two problems: fixed-threshold curricula can become misaligned with the policy's evolving capability boundary, and additive rewards can leak argument-level credit when the predicted tool is wrong. To address these problems, we propose MATCH, a closed-loop framework for model-aware tool learning with curriculum scheduling and hierarchically gated rewards. Model-Aware Curriculum Learning (MACL) maintains reward-derived sample difficulty that co-evolves with the policy, and each epoch selects samples near the current capability boundary together with a top-k pool of harder cases. Hierarchical Tool-call Gated Reward (HTGR) scores tool name, argument key, and argument value as a gated chain, granting credit at each level only when prerequisites hold. The same HTGR rewards drive both GRPO updates and MACL's difficulty refresh, closing the loop between policy optimization and sample scheduling. On API-Bank and BFCL V3, MATCH reaches 72.19% and 62.87% overall accuracy, outperforming the main supervised and RL-based baselines. Backbone experiments further show consistent improvements across four backbones from two model families.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Reading Emotions in the Token Space: Discriminative Adaptation of SpeechLLMs for Emotion Recognition

SpeechLLMs have shown strong potential for emotion recognition, yet they read the predicted emotion off a generative decoder not suited for classification: it can emit labels outside the target set and favors frequent classes. We propose a discriminative adaptation that reads the final prompt token's hidden state through a classification head, producing a label in one forward pass without modifying the backbone. Because this readout starts from the hidden state the model would otherwise decode, it gives a controlled comparison of generative and discriminative inference in an otherwise identical speechLLM. We keep the head a single linear layer, trading little accuracy for interpretability: each emotion becomes one direction in the LLM output token space, revealing associated tokens. On IEMOCAP, across two speechLLM architectures, it improves Macro F1 and removes hallucinations, with largest gains on realistic ASR transcripts. Our analysis reveals that these emotion directions encode indirect associations mirroring biases in web-scale text.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Tailored to you: longitudinal effects of personalising language models

Interest in developing personalised language models is rapidly growing. While personalisation is often viewed as a mechanism to better serve diverse user needs, the effects of sustained interactions with personalised models on people's perception of and behaviour toward AI remain poorly understood. Most critically, downstream consequences outside the immediate human--AI interaction loop, such as effects on users' self-perceptions and interpersonal relationships, remain largely unexamined. In this study, we recruited 992 participants to complete daily advice-seeking interactions with language models over the course of five days, comparing outcomes from a non-personalised baseline against two personalisation approaches: memory-based (conditioned on prior conversational history) and survey-based (conditioned on information collected through a pre-study intake survey). We find that several changes in human-AI interaction over time are driven primarily by repeated exposure rather than personalisation itself. However, participants interacting with personalised models experienced differences in advice-seeking and information-sharing attitudes and behaviours: participants in the memory-based condition engaged in greater self-disclosure and rated the model as less creepy, while participants in the survey-based condition reported higher regret about having shared personal information with the AI. We conclude by highlighting the nuanced effects of different personalisation approaches on interaction outcomes, and discussing the implications of these findings for the responsible design and deployment of personalised AI systems.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Marginal utility, matrix factorization, and the Key-Value (KV) cache: a unified information-economic framework for sovereign geo-mining inference

This paper builds a theoretical bridge between the economic notion of marginal utility and two machine-learning constructs, matrix factorization and the Key--Value cache of transformer language models. The singular value spectrum of a rating matrix is shown to be a diminishing marginal utility schedule for latent factors, the eigenvalue spectrum of the projected covariance operator to be the marginal utility schedule of a model's learned representation, and cache eviction and low-rank cache compression to be instances of constrained utility maximization under a memory budget. The three collapse into a single allocation rule: retain the top dimensions whose eigenvalue exceeds the shadow price of the binding constraint. The framework is applied to the automated extraction of structured information from geo-mining documents, where it motivates a multi-pass inference protocol, a layer-wise TIES model merging procedure, and a selection policy combining extraction quality, localization drift and energy, scalarized with a Conditional Value-at-Risk term on drift. Two empirical contributions are reported. An 11.2-million-parameter hierarchical classifier, trained in about five minutes on a single GPU, reaches 90.0 per cent level-1 accuracy on a held-out test set from a 973-document uranium-exploration corpus, against 92.0 per cent for a proprietary model on a fifty-document human audit of the same corpus, at a latency of 2.62 ms per card against approximately 2,000 ms for the API and at negligible cost. A diagnostic of uniform-density TIES merging exposes a reproducible degenerate mode in which the merged model returns token-identical outputs across five geographically distinct districts while declaring high confidence; re-executing the merge under layer-wise calibrated densities removes that signature on the diagnostic sample. The full-scale extraction benchmark, including LoRA fine-tuning, is reported as projected rather than measured and remains an empirical extension of this work.

en
arXiv AI Papers

WiCleanData: Guaranteeing the Type Consistency of Wikidata by Taxonomy Refinement and Constraint Enforcement

Because of its collaborative nature, Wikidata suffers from errors, in- consistencies, and excessive complexity, such as redundant classes, ambiguity between instances and classes, wrong taxonomic paths, and type constraint violations. The manual curation of these issues is infeasible at scale. To address these challenges, we introduce WiCleanData, a refined version of Wikidata with a consistent tax- onomy and free from type constraint violations. Specifically, we have designed an automated pipeline that first cleans the taxonomy with language model assistance, then simplifies type constraints by hierarchical aggregation, and finally filters facts accordingly. The resulting knowledge graph, free from any type violation, is made publicly available via a Web interface, enabling easy exploration and downstream applications.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Can Data Attribution Filter Out Subliminal Learning? Not Reliably

Subliminal learning allows language models to transmit behavioral traits through training data with no obvious semantic relationship to those traits, undermining content-based data filtering as a safety intervention. Training data attribution offers an alternative: it identifies the training examples responsible for a given model behavior, independent of their semantic content, and so may apply in exactly the cases where semantic inspection fails. We evaluate three gradient-based attribution methods (GradCos, a contrastive GradCos variant, and EK-FAC) across three models, comparing them against divergence tokens, a strong baseline previously shown to localize subliminal learning (albeit one that requires access to counterfactual teacher models). Filtering at the token level, EK-FAC mitigates a significant part of the effect, the other methods provide little benefit, and all mostly fall short of divergence tokens. Filtering entire samples is less effective for every method, though EK-FAC often gives a stronger signal than divergence tokens in this setting. Success is inconsistent across methods and settings: variants that work well for some model-preference combinations fail for others, and we do not identify a consistent explanation for these differences. Our results suggest that gradient-based attribution can identify data responsible for subliminal learning in some settings, but that some approximations are more reliable than others.

en
AWS Machine Learning Blog

Improving HCLS AI reasoning with open-source agent skills

AI agents on foundation models often misapply healthcare and life sciences decision frameworks, citing the right guideline but applying it incorrectly. This post shares 38 open-source agent skills across 11 HCLS domains that close this gap, with installation steps, three worked use cases, and a 410-prompt evaluation showing a 70-86% win rate.

en
AWS Machine Learning Blog

Fault tolerant distributed training on Amazon EKS using NVRx

Integrate NVIDIA Resiliency Extension (NVRx) into PyTorch FSDP training on Amazon EKS to overlap checkpoint I/O with training and recover from GPU faults in seconds. This post covers async checkpointing, in-process restart, and ft_launcher in-job restart, with H100 benchmarks at 2 to 8 nodes showing 99%+ training efficiency and second-scale recovery.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Objective vs. Search: Decomposing What Makes a Good Tokeniser

Two dominant tokenisation algorithms are used by modern language models: byte-pair encoding (BPE) and UnigramLM. These differ along two orthogonal axes: their optimisation objective (compression vs. log-likelihood) and their search procedure (bottom-up merging vs. top-down pruning). Existing comparisons confound these axes, making it unclear whether their observed differences stem from what is being optimised vs. how it is being optimised. We disentangle the two by introducing two new tokenisation algorithms that complete this 2x2 design space: BottomUpLL, a bottom-up likelihood-based tokeniser, and TopDownComp, a top-down compression-based tokeniser. We train language models with tokenisers produced by each algorithm, varying: model size, vocabulary sizes, and domain (English-only vs. multilingual). Evaluating models on bits-per-byte, we find that the search procedure -- not the objective -- is the dominant factor: bottom-up tokenisers consistently achieve lower bits-per-byte in most settings. Evaluating models on the BLiMP task, however, shows no consistent relationship between design choice and performance. Overall, our results disentangle the effect of tokeniser design choices on language modelling performance, offering concrete guidance for their more principled construction.

en
arXiv AI Papers

A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

Direct preference alignment methods are widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because of their computational and memory efficiency. However, likelihood displacement motivates alternative ways to extract information from preference pairs with small likelihood margins. In this paper, we propose and analyze Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison oracles. ComPO extracts directional information from these pairs without directly optimizing a differentiable preference loss on them. We establish a convergence guarantee for its basic offline scheme under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and compatibility between the oracle and a latent objective. We further introduce online ComPO, which retains the offline comparison mechanism and uses unlabeled policy generations for reverse-KL control relative to a reference policy. Following the coverage perspective of preference fine-tuning, we establish a performance guarantee for a basic constrained scheme under local coverage and in-distribution pairwise reward accuracy. Experiments on Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, and Gemma-3 models demonstrate improvements over existing direct alignment methods, including length-controlled win rates, with pair-level diagnostics providing evidence consistent with mitigating likelihood displacement.

en
arXiv AI Papers

PANORAMA: Panoptic Grounded Captioning via Mask Proposal Selection

Intelligent systems that act in the world require image understanding that is both comprehensive and spatially grounded. Current vision-language models (VLMs) can generate fluent and detailed image captions, but reliably associating them with image pixels remains challenging. Existing methods that combine dense captioning with pixel-level grounding often produce either incomplete descriptions or inaccurate segmentation masks. We study this problem through panoptic grounded captioning, a task that requires a VLM to describe both foreground objects and background regions while grounding each referring phrase with pixel-level masks. We make three contributions. First, we introduce PanoCaps, a human-annotated benchmark constructed from panoptic segmentation datasets. It provides dense captions with near-complete pixel coverage and image-text alignments at the entity level, supporting both training and evaluation. We further propose a phrase-mask matching protocol and a generalized Panoptic Quality (gPQ) metric that jointly evaluates textual and mask agreement. Second, we formulate phrase grounding as selection from a phrase-conditioned pool of mask proposals and introduce PANORAMA, a VLM that conditions a pretrained segmenter on contextualized phrase representations to obtain candidate masks and learns to select those corresponding to each phrase. Training this interface jointly with caption generation enables PANORAMA to produce high-quality masks while allowing each phrase to refer to a single region or multiple instances. Third, PANORAMA achieves the best overall grounding on PanoCaps and matches or exceeds specialized models across several pixel-level grounding tasks. Experiments show that our method produces precise entity-level segmentations while maintaining detailed, mask-consistent captions. Code, data and models are available at https://www.di.ens.fr/willow/research/panorama/.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Playing log(N)-Questions over Wikipedia Abstracts: Communication Efficiency Between Paired Frontier Models

We evaluate six frontier language models on the two-agent (N)-Questions game. A questioner sees N Wikipedia lead paragraphs and must identify a secretly chosen target using exactly _2 N yes/no questions. An answerer sees only the target and the question, and replies with one word. Both roles run on the same provider, so the game measures how well a model communicates with itself across an information asymmetry. We run 408 games over document sets of 4 to 1024 paragraphs at a total API cost of \$363. One model finishes well behind the others: Claude Opus 5 wins 28 of 68 games, against 45 to 56 for GLM-5.3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K3. The leading five are only marginally separable. Pooling those five, win rate declines with set size at r=-0.973 and is fit by a single per-round reliability parameter. The form is win=p^{_2 N} with p=0.928. Losses divide into answer errors and discrimination failures in roughly equal measure, and models almost never name a document their own evidence excludes. Every unanimous answer error from the weakest model was inspected: 32 of 34 are ``No'' answers, on properties stated in the document's first sentence, under an instruction that explicitly warns against defaulting to ``No''. Information per question, estimated from answer balance, correlates with win rate at r=+0.88. The only two models to extract a full bit per question are the only two that partition on document titles, a strategy absent below N{=}32 and used in a quarter of questions above it. Reasoning-token expenditure varies 4.5across models with little relation to success, and the trace grows as the candidate set shrinks without a matching gain in reliability.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Monitoring and Discovering Reward Hacking with Internal Representations during LLM Evaluations

As models scale, reward hacking becomes more frequent, more sophisticated, and more consequential. Does it leave a telltale signature in model representations? This work analyzes how reward hacking is represented internally in frontier open source LLMs, and how those representations can be used to understand and discover the range of hacking behaviors a model displays. In particular, we find that simple difference of means vectors coherently represent reward hacking in Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, and Qwen 3.8 Max across a variety of behaviors in common evaluations. Despite their simplicity, these vectors are both generalizable and interpretable, and we can use them to reliably detect reward hacking. We first evaluate reward hacking in commonly reported benchmarks like DeepSWE and SWE-bench, finding that models reward hack excessively in these environments; GLM 5.2 hacks in 57.2% of rollouts on DeepSWE and in 73% of rollouts on SWE-bench. Catching these requires monitors; LLM monitors are effective, but expensive detectors. We show that DoM vectors are similarly effective but virtually free, catching 3.1% more hacks in Kimi K3 and 7.9% fewer hacks in GLM 5.2 on DeepSWE at a monitor matched false positive rate. DoM vectors run on the chain-of-thought also predict reward hacks in the model's subsequent actions, meaning we can run them online and catch potential hacks before they occur. Finally, we analyze probe-hits that LLM monitors do not catch and discover other undesirable behaviors, as well as show transfer to finding hacks in non-SWE evaluations. Together, these results provide evidence that simple, white-box methods can be used to scalably study and monitor reward hacking behaviors in frontier open source models

en
arXiv AI Papers

MUSE: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Multi-Modal Understanding in Situated Education

Large vision-language models have achieved remarkable progress in multi-modal understanding, yet their capabilities in educational settings remain insufficiently evaluated. In AI-assisted language learning, models must interpret artistic imagery, understand its semantic, affective, and cultural content, and reason about visual context to support meaningful interaction. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on real-world images or domain-specific educational reasoning, providing limited coverage of artistic educational content. To address this gap, we introduce MUSE, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models on artistic image understanding in situated educational applications. MUSE decouples image annotation from question generation, enabling diverse tasks with controllable difficulty while reducing annotation effort. It comprises twelve tasks spanning visual perception, semantic and affective interpretation, culture understanding, and compositional reasoning, together with diverse artistic images deliberately curated to center Singaporean and Southeast Asian multicultural contexts alongside Western art traditions, covering multiple themes and difficulty levels. Evaluation of open-source and proprietary models reveals substantial disparities across capability dimensions, particularly in affective interpretation and compositional reasoning. Our analysis further identifies common failure modes and key challenges for developing trustworthy multi-modal models for education. We hope MUSE will serve as a standardized benchmark for advancing multi-modal understanding in situated educational applications.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Long-Lived Characters, Local Inference: Incremental Memory Maintenance for Game NPCs

A game character should not have to reread its entire life before every conversation. For locally deployed language-model characters, however, revising a few memories can invalidate a long reusable prefix. The resulting preparation cost competes with both foreground dialogue and the maintenance of other characters. This matters especially when dialogue feeds game-defined actions and value judgments: a fluent but incorrect account of who owns an item, or whether a transfer has already happened, can corrupt the input to otherwise deterministic rules. We study incremental memory maintenance for long-lived game NPCs in a quantized Qwen hybrid recurrent-attention model. Our runtime removes superseded attention KV entries, computes replacement records at the true sequence tail, and preserves the continuing recurrent state and unchanged KV. Existing local experiments combine multi-update dialogue replays, fixed-input placement ablations, and attention diagnostics. Independent block composition weakens query-conditioned memory selection without a uniform chunk-initial attention collapse. True-tail updates preserve important current-state and historical bindings across eight scripted maintenance rounds; a placement case recovers the full-refill quantity in three reconstructions, while slot-preserving alternatives repeat a double-subtraction error. Attention-distribution proximity alone does not explain these semantic differences. The results motivate treating a character's inference state as a maintained, history-dependent resource, rather than only a disposable encoding of its latest memory text.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models suffer from large parameter counts, which create a significant memory bottleneck. Expert pruning is the most direct approach for reducing this parameter count, yet existing methods make pruning decisions for each expert independently, and assume experts' contributions are purely additive. In reality, expert usage in MoEs is inherently cooperative. We derive HOPE (Higher-Order Pruning of Experts), a second-order pruning objective which provably minimizes an upper bound on the error resulting from pruning. We show that REAP (a state-of-the-art first-order pruning method) is a special case of HOPE where interaction terms are ignored. Across three frontier MoE models (up to 122B parameters), two distinct calibration sets, and multiple benchmarks (including math, instruction following, coding, and an agentic suite), we demonstrate that HOPE produces better pruning decisions than existing methods, and its advantage is most pronounced at high pruning rates and on challenging agentic workloads. At 50% pruning, HOPE outperforms all baselines and achieves an average rank of 1.58 out of 5 methods (versus 2.42 for the next-best method, REAP), with gains of up to +6.1% on agentic coding. Over all conditions, HOPE again achieves the best average rank and surpasses every other method in the majority of head-to-head comparisons. By preserving cooperative expert structure that first-order methods ignore, HOPE enables aggressive compression with minimal degradation, particularly on complex tasks where diverse expert combinations are invoked over long sequences.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking

Agent benchmarks are substantially more costly to evaluate than conventional LLM benchmarks. Benchmark compression is therefore a natural solution, yet existing methods primarily model redundancy in task--model final-score distributions, which is important in agentic evaluation. To address this limitation, we analyze large-scale trajectories and identify six complementary process signals that are systematically associated with final agent performance. To disentangle agent performance redundancy from a complete perspective, we propose DualViewEval, an agent benchmark compression method that jointly exploits outcome and process relations to learn an exact-size miniset and predict the full-benchmark scores. Across five agent benchmarks and five representative baselines, DualViewEval achieves the best results in all datasets. With only 20 tasks, it achieves 24--40compression on APEX-Agents and BFCL, reducing mean absolute error (MAE) by 14.5\%--28.2\% over the strongest competitors while improving Kendall's τ by up to 7.2\% relative to EssenceBench on SWE-bench Verified. The selected minisets further reveal capability differences among different agents, providing compact and diagnostic feedback for efficient agentic model development.

en