overfeed.news
Anuncio

SRExpert

Deja de saltar entre 6 herramientas de Kubernetes.

Monitoreo, alertas, seguridad, despliegues Helm y operaciones con IA en una sola plataforma.

Probar 30 días gratis

Tema

Agentes

3029documentos

235últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

Agentic Attribution of Cloud Resource Ownership

Security tools raise findings across cloud environments, and AI agents now investigate and prioritize them. A finding is still resolved by people: it has to reach the people responsible for fixing it and accountable for the resource it concerns. Ownership is the organizational context that decides who that is. Where recorded, it is declared by hand in configuration management databases or owner tags and goes stale unless kept current; accounts are shared, and automation creates much of the infrastructure. The knowledge sits in work records, code history, audit logs and identity directories, encoded in each organization's own conventions. Recovering it poses four challenges: the signal is scattered across sources, none of them authoritative; the conventions that carry it differ between organizations; reaching an owner takes multi-hop links; and those related to a resource differ in the strength of their relation. We define ownership as a set of entities, people or teams, each related to the resource by one of five patterns ordered by strength. We present a reference architecture for agentic ownership attribution that derives ownership from these records instead of declaring it: it profiles an organization offline into tested signal procedures and an ownership playbook, then attributes each resource with a coordinator agent and parallel investigators, with confidence computed by rules. On 100 resources of 50 Amazon Web Services (AWS) resource types in one organization, we pool the architecture's candidates with those of an unprimed general-purpose agent and verify every evidence piece against the records. The architecture reaches 92.1% weighted recall and 86.6% weighted precision, against 54.8% and 77.4%, at 0.55 times the agent's cost per unit of coverage. The difference lies in people who build and change resources without an explicit owner, found through work records and code history.

en
arXiv AI Papers

When Credit Turns Against Tools: Transition-Aware Credit Assignment in Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Agentic reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards trains language models through multi-turn tool interactions, yet their reasoning performance and tool-calling ability can decline during training. We trace this degradation to three coupled mechanisms: (1) tool-token imbalance produces negative overall tool credit when incorrect trajectories contain more tool tokens per turn than correct ones; (2) aggregation amplification can further strengthen this negative signal as token-mean aggregation gives longer incorrect trajectories greater weight in policy updates; and (3) failure-driven retries prolong trajectories as models tend to call tools again after execution errors, extending potential negative credit to recovery attempts. To counter this suppression, we propose Transition-Aware Credit Assignment (TACA), which targets the transition from reasoning to tool use through supervision of both call initiation and generation. Specifically, TACA uses Advantage Projection to enforce a nonnegative mean advantage on tool-call tokens within each prompt group through a minimal uniform shift. Additionally, TACA guides tool-use decisions with Decision Contrast, comparing rewards for tool-assisted and direct answers to the same prompt. Through Supervised Replay, it reinforces tool-call generation using calls from previously sampled correct trajectories. Across models and tasks, TACA improves performance and sustains more reliable tool interaction during training, raising mean accuracy over MT-GRPO on six reasoning benchmarks by 4.61 percentage points for Qwen2.5-1.5B and 3.61 for Qwen2.5-3B. Our code is available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/TACA.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Verify Before You Fetch: Reliable KV Cache Compression for LLM Inference

Long-context applications, long-lived agents, and multi-agent systems require large language models (LLMs) to process and retain extensive information. In these settings, the KV cache can exceed GPU high-bandwidth memory (HBM) capacity, necessitating offloading to host memory, where CPU-to-GPU transfers can dominate inference latency. While KV cache compression can reduce data movement, query-agnostic compression that guarantees accurate attention for arbitrary queries is extremely challenging, if not impossible. We introduce VerKV, a hybrid approach that provides (ε, δ) guarantees for approximating attention on any given query. VerKV maintains a compact set of query-agnostic pivotal tokens on the GPU, together with a token-level sketch of the full KV cache, while retaining the complete cache in CPU memory. We introduce a novel stochastic sampling procedure, PoissonComp, to select the pivotal tokens. At inference time, our proposed KVFetch algorithm uses the pivotal tokens and the sketch to estimate the relative error of the resulting attention computation. If the estimate satisfies a user-specified (ε, δ) tolerance, inference proceeds without accessing host memory. Otherwise, VerKV performs query-aware retrieval to fetch additional tokens from the CPU, refining the attention computation to meet the required tolerance. Thus, VerKV enables attention with bounded approximation error while minimizing CPU-to-GPU transfers. We show that PoissonComp outperforms state-of-the-art approaches to KV cache compression. Combined with KVFetch, it achieves near-dense performance (90-100% of dense quality at 32K context length, averaged over RULER and LOFT), using Qwen3-4B, Qwen3.5-9B and Ministral-3-8B, while reducing the GPU memory footprint by 8-32x and keeping CPU-to-GPU memory fetches within 2-23% of the cache per generated token, depending on the model.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Hybrid Source Code Change Impact Analysis

Change impact analysis (CIA) helps developers identify code entities impacted by their initial changes. While several approaches for CIA were proposed, they still struggle with either low precision or low recall, thereby increasing manual effort for developers to verify the results. Furthermore, limitations in the used datasets and experimental setups can bias the results reported by many CIA approaches. In this paper, we first address the dataset limitations by manually labeling 1,931 changed code entities stemming from 263 commits of 22 open-source Java projects. Next, we introduce two variants of katIA, our code change impact analysis approach that combines static impact analysis with the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The first variant uses a single prompt (katIA-SP) for refining an initial static impact set while the second variant uses three specialized agents (katIA-MA). The evaluation with our curated dataset shows that katIA-SP with Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved an F1-score of 22.4% when matching impacted entities by their fully qualified names (FQN) and 27.0% when matching them by their class and entity names (CE). The latter shows an improvement of 2.0 percentage points over the state-of-the-art. This score is further improved by katIA-MA which, using Gemini 2.5 Flash, yields an FQN-matching F1-score of 29.1% and a CE-matching F1-score of 33.3%. While these improvements come at the cost of increased median generation time from 0.570 s to 11.214 s and median token usage from 1,235 to 6,462 tokens, the improved performance justifies the additional cost. The comparison of three LLMs using katIA-SP finds that Gemini 2.5 Flash is the most consistent model. These results indicate that combining static impact analysis with LLM-based refinement, particularly with the multi-agent variant, can improve code change impact analysis.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning for an Options Market Maker: An Empirical Study with Real S&P 500 Options

Options market makers absorb client order flow and must hedge the resulting inventory risk under trading frictions. We study whether an option hedging reinforcement learning (RL) agent trained on historical market data outperforms three alternatives in tail-risk protection: (i) traditional delta hedging, (ii) simple hedge-ratio rules, and (iii) the same agent trained in simulated markets. Most RL hedging agents are trained in model-generated markets that do not capture the crashes and volatility regimes present in real data. We introduce an empirical replay environment using S&P 500 option data from 1996 to 2017 and compare against a matched geometric Brownian motion (GBM) environment, a stochastic-volatility (SABR) simulator, and a hybrid that values historical paths with Black-Scholes, all sharing the same portfolio mechanics, stochastic arrivals, costs, and test period. We train a distributional Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) agent and evaluate it out of sample over 2018-2023. The agent trained on empirical data reduces Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) tail loss by 3.1% compared to delta hedging and outperforms every hedge-ratio rule chosen during the training period and every alternative training environment. The reduction reaches 8.9% in volatile and falling markets, but reverses to a cost of 7-10% in rising markets. Empirical training induces a state-dependent short net delta: the policy under-hedges negative-delta books, most strongly after prices have fallen. This tilt disappears with GBM training and is weaker with SABR or hybrid training. These findings suggest that exposure to historical market dynamics can materially change a tail-risk hedging policy, although the evidence rests on a single test path and the edge is regime-conditional.

en
arXiv AI Papers

DeepFinance: Can AI Diligence a $100MM Deal?

Existing evaluations of AI models on high-finance work focus on retrieving answers from financial documents and producing numerically correct outputs. Real private equity (PE) and investment banking (IB) work also depends on choosing between conflicting sources, making sound assumptions, and keeping every step auditable. We introduce DeepFinance, an ultra long-horizon benchmark of 21 end-to-end PE and IB tasks that take a human professional an average of 27.1 hours. Each task pairs a request with a data room averaging 19 files and is graded against an average of 84 expert-written rubric criteria covering output, workflow, and judgment. We evaluate 22 model configurations, each in its native agent harness. The best configuration, GPT-6 Astra with max reasoning, satisfies 57.6% of rubric criteria, and the top four configurations are not statistically distinguishable. Frontier models often calculate correctly from the wrong inputs and find decision-relevant evidence without acting on it.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Keeping LLM Agents on Procedure: Executable Finite-State Control for Long-Horizon Instruction Fidelity

Much of the automation handed to language-model agents is procedural: each step needs little intelligence, but a long unattended run must follow a skill or SOP stated once at the start. We show that agents drift from such procedures over long runs, and that restating the instructions or resuming a stopped agent only moves the drift to another shortcut. We study an executable finite-state machine (FSM) that keeps the workflow state outside the model's context and enforces it at three points: tool calls, state transitions and the end of the agent's turn. In a pre-registered experiment on 200-account SOP-Bench batches, Claude Haiku 4.5 with the FSM decided on average 139 accounts correctly and by the procedure, against 48 for the strongest baseline (95% CI of the difference [46, 130]), and kept this rate to the end; across three models, the gain tracked how much the plain agent drifted. Because the runtime, not the model, supplies this long-horizon reliability, the FSM can let small models carry procedural work: Haiku 4.5 with it averaged more such decisions than plain Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 38% of the cost. Analyses on SWE-bench Verified, τ^2-bench, and staged and cross-context workflows further suggest that reliable long-horizon automation can come from stronger execution control, not only stronger models.

en
arXiv AI Papers

What Broke & Why: Practical Lessons from Reinforcement Learning Post-Training

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become an important way to improve how language models reason, solve problems, and use tools. But getting it to work in practice is not always straightforward. Training can fail because a model receives no useful reward, learns to exploit the reward system, stops exploring, or appears to improve when the evaluation itself is misleading. In this book, we give a practical introduction to reinforcement learning post-training for language models, focusing on what works, what fails, and why. We begin with the foundations of post-training, explain GRPO and the training loop step by step, and then follow five training programs covering math reasoning, search agents, training stability, mixture-of-experts models, and software engineering tasks. Each program shows the problems encountered, the changes made, and the lessons learned. The book also examines what reinforcement learning actually changes inside a model. The remaining chapters provide a practical reference for reward design, evaluation, training tool-using agents, debugging common failures, reproducibility, rollout engines, and hardware. Written for researchers and practitioners working with open models, the book aims to help readers understand how to train models, recognize when something goes wrong, and decide what to try next.

en
arXiv AI Papers

A Gamified Framework for Conflict-Driven Design: Discovering Strategies for Collaborative Resilience with Multi-Agent Learning

Conflicting stakeholder objectives make it difficult to coordinate investments in urban resilience. We model conflict-driven urban design as a non-zero-sum digital board game in which stakeholder agents allocate scarce resources and balance individual payoffs against shared urban development and resilience objectives. We use multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to train policies and examine their behavior across three settings. On a 4 x 4 board, learned policies reach about 84% of the total return found by a simulated annealing benchmark. On an 8 x 8 board with spatial and resource constraints, trained agents favor projects that improve resilience in self-play. In a 12 x 12 simulation initialized from historical maps of Tatsumi, Tokyo, trained agents achieve a mean total score of 452.1, compared with 357.3 for a random-policy baseline across 10,000 simulation runs. Gains in adaptability, sustainability, flood resistance, and greenery come with reductions in vitality and density. A human-in-the-loop interface supports replay and lets participants take over stakeholder decisions, providing a testbed for exploring these trade-offs in participatory urban planning.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Firepool: Brokering Warm GPU Capacity for Agentic and RL Workloads at LinkedIn

AI agents and reinforcement-learning (RL) trainers run thousands of short, isolated GPU jobs: tool calls, verifiers, and rollouts. A job often finishes in seconds, but starting a GPU pod for it takes 20-35 s even when the container image is already on the node, and minutes when it is not. A warm pod removes the wait only if it can serve the next job, and keeping pods warm must neither waste GPUs nor leak state between callers. Firepool, the sandbox and execution broker behind agentic and RL workloads at LinkedIn, meets both requirements. It makes pods interchangeable by building them from a shared base image per hardware profile and binding each job's code, extra dependencies, and cluster topology when the job starts. It keeps them warm cheaply and safely by reusing a pod only for the caller that used it last, staging zero-VRAM standby pods in fractional GPU shares alongside active pods, and capping the GPUs that warm pools may hold via queue-driven budgets. Over a sampled peak period in production, Firepool serves 94.7% of 3,206 pod requests from warm or standby capacity. In paired benchmarks with fixed-duration jobs on production H200 nodes, agent and RL loops finish 13x and 10.8x faster than with a fresh pod per job; against a fresh reuse tag per job, warm reuse cuts p90 start latency from 59.1 s to 3.5 s. When a job cannot reuse the previous pod, standby promotion shortens the handover wait from 51 s to 0.94 s. In local and simulated runs, a keep-alive matched to the loop's pauses keeps the latency benefit while holding about half the capacity of an always-on pool.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Selective Cooperative Perception via Blind Spot Reasoning and Agentic Dialogue with Vision-Language Models

Real-time cooperative perception (CP) in multi-agent traffic environments is highly resource-intensive, which posing scalability challenges for large-scale deployment. Efficiency can be significantly improved by selectively performing CP only in safety-critical scenarios and for key occluding objects. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are well-suited for complex reasoning in dynamic and uncertain environments, making them a promising tool for this selective CP task. This study proposes a VLM-driven agentic framework for blind spot reasoning and dialogue-based CP. A mixed-model architecture is designed that integrates conventional object detection for stable perception, vision-language reasoning for identifying impactful occlusions, and a physics-based geometric module to align reasoning with real-world visibility constraints. The framework also incorporates a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting mechanism to enhance interpretability and intent-aware decision-making. We collect real-world data from connected vehicles operating in urban traffic and compare the driving-critical blind spot identification and dialogue performance of four state-of-the-art VLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves over 80% accuracy in driving-critical blind spot detection and over 90% success in dialogue-driven perception sharing. This work provides a scalable, interpretable, and bandwidth-efficient alternative to conventional CP pipelines, and offers new insights into agentic communication design for future connected traffic systems.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Sampling Is Not Curiosity: Why LLM Agents Should Investigate

LLM agents are increasingly used for open-ended tasks, very common in research scenarios where they are required to explore, investigate, or act curiously. At inference time, an LLM is a fixed map from context to next-token distribution, the pretrained weights determine the function, and only its conditioning changes as context accumulates. Mechanisms like temperature, best-of-N, tree search, or RAG vary how the distribution is sampled or what it is conditioned on, but do not update the agent's model of the environment. We argue that current LLM agents do not explore curiously; they explore stochastically. From how curiosity is understood in the RL literature, it requires a predictive structure over how the environment responds to the agent's actions, which improves online from current interaction, drives action selection through its predicted improvement, and persists beyond the context window. Additionally, in its open-ended form, the agent should intrinsically originate what to investigate. Thus, we propose a framework defining curiosity in LLM agents, reserving the term for systems that satisfy it. In doing so, we identify the research directions its implementation opens up.

en
arXiv AI Papers

PatternBloom: Empowering Agentic RAG with Externalized RL-Distilled Graph Patterns

Reinforcement-learning-trained agents for retrieval-augmented generation retrieve content (passages, knowledge-graph fragments, or hyperedges) and supervise training with outcome rewards on the final answer. Across these paradigms the reasoning route through retrieved content never leaves the language model's hidden state, conflating declarative knowledge with the procedural knowledge that recurs across queries of the same logical type; content-only methods consequently plateau as reasoning depth grows. We introduce PatternBloom, an agentic RAG framework that shifts the unit of retrieval from content (what to read) to logic (how to reason). A first RL stage scores the agent's constructed evidence graph by a frozen oracle's information gain through the Information-Density Reward (IDR), a size-normalized mutual-information surrogate. High-reward trajectories are distilled into a Graph Pattern Memory (GPM) of type-abstracted reasoning skeletons, and a second RL stage uses the Pattern-Augmented Reward (PAR) to couple policy to memory, turning procedural reasoning into a learnable, externalized structural prior. A 7B PatternBloom outperforms 27 baselines by +15.0 Avg-OOD EM, with the gain compounding with reasoning depth precisely because procedural knowledge, once distilled, is reused rather than re-derived at every query. We release our code at https://github.com/EllenYiGe/PatternBloom.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Hibana: Fast Agentic Inference on Unified-Memory Devices

Local AI promises capable personal assistants that run on users' own devices, keeping data and computation under their control. Open-weight models that fit on local devices can now handle practical tasks such as coding. Yet current inference engines fall short. Popular engines such as vLLM and SGLang target datacenter GPUs with dedicated host memory, while local engines underuse the memory hierarchy of unified-memory devices. We present Hibana, an inference engine for unified-memory devices that co-optimizes model representation, memory management, and decoding strategy. Model surgery, the process of editing a trained model's architecture to suit its hardware, changes how the model computes, shrinking its memory footprint and data movement. Unified-memory management preserves each agent's state across turns, so long-running agents can resume instantly instead of recomputing their state. Adaptive speculation generates several tokens per step. Hibana codesigns these features around the shared memory capacity and limited bandwidth of unified-memory systems-on-chip to support local multi-agent workloads. On a single DGX Spark serving Qwen and Nemotron models of up to 125B parameters, Hibana completes up to 3.4more agentic tasks per hour and delivers up to 3.9higher decoding throughput than other established frameworks such as vLLM, NVIDIA Flare, llama.cpp, and TensorFold. Code is available at https://github.com/sharar-project/hibana.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Represented but Not Used: Value-Policy Dissociation in LLM Agents

Large language model (LLM) agents need to choose actions whose consequences unfold over multiple future steps, yet poor decisions do not reveal whether the model failed to represent those consequences or failed to use them. Mechanistic interpretability has studied internal representations of environment state and plans, but sequential decision making also requires evaluating how candidate actions change future outcomes. Reinforcement learning formalizes this as action value. We study this computation in Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, and GPT-OSS-20B across a partially observed Grid environment and WebShop, a simulated web shopping environment. We find that the relative values of candidate actions are linearly decodable from intermediate hidden states, including at states where the policy prefers a worse action. We call this gap between value representation and policy choice value-policy dissociation. To investigate how represented value relates to action selection, we compare direct interventions along the value readout direction with Natural Value Transport (NVT), a transformation learned from hidden state changes that naturally result from differences in action value. While readout-direction interventions have limited and inconsistent effects, NVT more consistently influences action preferences, particularly at later layers. We also test a closed-loop controller that uses the value readout as a sensor and NVT as an actuator, observing improvements in task outcomes. These results suggest that LLM agents can represent useful prospective value without reliably translating it into policy choice.

en
arXiv AI Papers

BunshinRL: Splitting Live Agent Workspaces for Memory-Efficient Agentic RL

Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) rollouts interleave model reasoning with tool calls in persistent workspaces. Scaling these rollouts incurs substantial memory costs for concurrent environments, while slow tool calls delay entire rollout batches. We present BunshinRL, an agentic RL rollout system that exploits shared environment state and recurring tool calls through three techniques: memory sharing across environments, tool-prefix caching, and speculative tool execution. These techniques build on BunshinFork, a novel live whole-workspace forking mechanism for containers. BunshinFork reconstructs process trees, shares memory copy-on-write, and preserves file, communication, and GUI state, enabling cached-state reuse and rollback after incorrect speculation. We implement BunshinRL and BunshinFork through Linux kernel module and CRIU modifications. BunshinRL reduces peak memory by up to 43%, total memory consumption by up to 51%, and end-to-end rollout latency by 23%.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Who Remembers What? Multi-Granularity Memory Extraction for Multi-User, Multi-Agent Interaction

Self-evolving agents improve their own skills, memory, and harness code from experience without retraining the base LLM, and group-evolving agents go further by sharing these lessons across agents. Yet most such systems overlook that sharing across users and heterogeneous agents requires deciding who can benefit from each lesson and what information must remain private. We present MixUA, a memory system that distills independent user-agent trajectories into lessons and assigns each lesson to a user-agent pair, user, agent, or global scope according to whom it benefits and what it may disclose. For evaluation, we introduce CrossLearnBench, a mixed-user-agent benchmark that pairs established agent tasks with user preferences and privacy probes that test whether private facts leak into memory other users can read. With five users and seven agents, MixUA raises pass rates by up to 16 points over no memory and 5 over a single global memory, even on tasks previously tried only by other users on other agents. It retains up to 90% of previously stated preferences, and at most 0.02% of privacy probes find a planted private fact in a forbidden scope. We hope MixUA offers a scalable path toward a global system where users and agents co-evolve.

en
arXiv AI Papers

HexIt: Learning Hexahedral Block Decomposition with Expert Iteration on Combinatorial Maps

Decomposing a polyhedral solid into a few well-shaped hexahedral blocks is a long-standing open problem in mesh generation. We cast it as a sequential decision problem on a 3-dimensional generalised map: an agent splits edges, faces and volumes with three insert operations until every cell is a hexahedron and the mesh passes a quality threshold, and a policy that convolves over the map's involutions chooses each insert. A successful decomposition takes over a hundred decisions, and a uniformly random policy never finds one. We clone a policy from constructed decompositions and improve it by expert iteration. On held-out chamfered solids that share no boundary topology with the cloning data, the final policy solves an expected 94.4\% in 20 samples, and expert iteration raises the best-of-20 solve rate on large chamfered solids from 0.203 to 0.355. At matched compute, PPO, GRPO and VinePPO updates all make the cloned policy worse.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Deploying Physically and Epistemically Compliant Agents by Distilling Belief-Space Task and Motion Planners

In this work, we train agents to act under uncertainty according to specified, belief-dependent rules. Deep reinforcement learning (RL) can in theory train agents to follow rules if encoded into well-designed rewards, but in practice, RL fails to perfectly optimize these rewards, leading to ineffective or noncompliant agent behavior. Belief-space planners by construction produce behavior in line with developer specification, but require hand-programming online planners and belief-state estimators, adding significant engineering complexity at scale. We combine the two: we plan offline to generate a dataset of sample trajectories and then distill the plans into a policy that acts on raw observations. We propose two changes to planner distillation that address problems specific to history-based policies: Dual Averaging, a loss that combines per-timestep predictive loss and average loss on task changes, and ρ-Optimal Reinforcement, a feedback mechanism that reinforces the policy's own successful rollouts when these are near-optimal. We provide a sufficient condition under which static search problems with noiseless observation models is complete, and show that maximum-likelihood-observation planning implies this condition in static search with continuous beliefs. We create a challenging new domain, Scavenger, where an agent needs to gain information in order to succeed. We evaluate our distilled policy in two versions of Scavenger, one where information is provided visually and one where it is provided as a command in natural language. In either case, the learned policy attains a success rate above 90% in Scavenger, compared with at most 5% for RL. We also find that distilled planners transfer with greater than 60% success to following unseen and intentionally vague commands and greater than 75% success to following floorplans larger than those seen in training.

en