overfeed.news
Anuncio

SRExpert

Deja de saltar entre 6 herramientas de Kubernetes.

Monitoreo, alertas, seguridad, despliegues Helm y operaciones con IA en una sola plataforma.

Probar 30 días gratis

Fuente

arXiv AI Papers

arxiv.org

6415documentos

Inicia sesión para seguir esta fuente
arXiv AI Papers

ADT: All-Atom Diffusion Tokenizer for 3D Molecular Structures

Discrete structural tokenization provides a promising route to autoregressive 3D molecular generation. Yet, existing tokenizers face a trade-off between compact representation and all-atom reconstruction: atom-level tokens preserve atomic details but produce long sequences, while compact residue-level protein tokens typically omit side-chain geometry. To overcome this limitation, we propose All-atom Diffusion Tokenizer (ADT), which decouples token granularity from reconstruction resolution. ADT uses one structural token per atom for small molecules and one token per protein residue that jointly represents backbone and side-chain geometry. To mitigate geometric distortion introduced by quantization, we leverage the generative capacity of diffusion models to recover fine-grained atomic geometry beyond deterministic decoding from discrete tokens. Extensive experiments across small molecules and proteins demonstrate that ADT achieves strong reconstruction from compact discrete representations while enabling high-quality autoregressive generation of both small molecules and all-atom protein structures. These results establish compact structural tokens as an effective discrete interface for all-atom molecular reconstruction and generation.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Reasoning Models Can Control Their Chains of Thought When They Tell Themselves To

Chain-of-thought (CoT) controllability, the ability of reasoning models to control properties of their CoT, is consequential for both their usefulness and reliable oversight. Recent work evaluates this capability by measuring whether models follow CoT constraints given in the user prompt, and reports very low controllability across models. We argue that this low controllability may not reflect an inherent inability of reasoning models to control their CoT, but instead result from naively specifying constraints in the user prompt. To test this, we introduce Self-Instructed CoT Controllability: a complementary evaluation that places the constraint as a self-instruction inside the model's CoT and measures its ability to follow it. We show that, under self-instruction, models achieve significantly higher controllability than with standard user instructions. Even a generic reminder to follow the user's constraint substantially improves controllability. Moreover, effective self-instructions can be bootstrapped into the reasoning through a simple instruction in the user prompt, enabling improved control even without access to the reasoning channel. Finally, using self-instruction, we demonstrate in a realistic monitoring setup that CoT controllability can be leveraged for monitor evasion, posing a risk to CoT monitorability.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Beyond Reward Scoring: Online Multi-Agent Preference Learning for Multimodal Response Generation

Multimodal preference alignment often follows a score-based RLHF pipeline: a reward model is first trained to learn human preferences, then used to score on-policy responses and optimize the response model's generation. This turns preference supervision into a scalar signal for generation: a model may learn to produce answers with higher preference scores, but is rarely trained explicitly to learn the reasons underlying human preferences. We therefore ask whether making preference understanding an internal capability of the response model can improve its generation. To investigate this question, we propose PrefMind, an online dual-agent reinforcement learning framework with two trainable agents: a response Generator and a preference Critic. Given a pair of candidate responses, the agents analyze and discuss which response better aligns with human preference. Human labels supervise their judgments and corrections. For pairs on which both the Generator and revised Critic correctly identify the human-preferred response, the Generator produces an improved answer, and the Critic compares it against the original preferred response to provide a generation reward. Both agents are jointly updated from interactions sampled with their current policies. Through this process, PrefMind trains the Generator to understand human preferences via explicit judgment and correction, and to translate this understanding into better responses. Experiments across three model scales show improvements in both standalone preference judgment and downstream response generation.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Sample, Mix, or Verify? Allocating Test-Time Compute under Imperfect Verifiers

A common way to make language models and agents more accurate is to spend more compute at inference time: generate many candidate solutions and submit the one a verifier prefers. Success then requires that some candidate is correct and that the verifier picks it. The first grows predictably with the number of samples; the second does not, because real verifiers (unit tests, majority votes, LLM judges, reward models) accept wrong answers, reject right ones, and make correlated mistakes. With a fixed budget, a practitioner must decide how many samples to draw, which models to draw them from, and how much to spend on verification, and today these choices are made by rules of thumb. We introduce SPLIT, which makes them from a small labelled pilot. It rests on an exact formula for the probability of submitting a correct answer under accept/reject and top-score selection that accounts for varying task difficulty, blind spots shared across models, and correlated repeated verifier calls. SPLIT fits the formula by empirical Bayes and uses it to plan budgets on unseen tasks. Across seven benchmarks spanning math, science QA, code and software-engineering agents, 26 models, 175 agent systems and six kinds of real verifiers, all from public releases, SPLIT lands within 0.02-0.8 percentage points of the best allocation in hindsight, while every fixed rule we test loses at least 2.5 points in some setting. Regret depends only on how well SPLIT ranks configurations, and it stays near-optimal under compute, price and latency costs and online. The formula also explains when asking more LLM judges lowers precision. As a forecaster far beyond the pilot, SPLIT beats power-law fitting when the verifier caps success, and we report where it loses.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Ignored, Not Refused: What Low Prompt-Injection Success Rates Hide in Small Tool-Using Agents

Tool-using agents read untrusted external content, which exposes them to indirect prompt injection (IPI), where hidden instructions hijack the agent's tool calls. Benchmarks measure IPI security by the attack success rate (ASR), which treats every failed attack as a successful defense. To test this assumption, we audit 33,000 trajectories from eleven open-weight agents (2-14B parameters) on InjecAgent and AgentDojo. A label-blind LLM judge shows that most failed attacks are ignored (76-80%) rather than refused (17-18%). With identical model weights, changing only the system prompt shifts InjecAgent ASR from 0.2% to 43%. Our Attack-Task Outcome Matrix (ATOM) further shows that in 21.7% of AgentDojo episodes, the agent stayed safe but did not complete the user's task. A low ASR therefore mostly reflects agents silently ignoring injections, not refusing them. Evaluations should report how attacks fail and whether the user's task is completed, alongside ASR. We release the labeled corpus, judge prompt, and analysis code.

en
arXiv AI Papers

FLARE: Physics-Grounded Evaluation of Language-Model Agents for Feeder Restoration with Degraded Observations

Restoring service after distribution-grid faults requires decisions from incomplete and conflicting information while respecting electrical constraints. Addressing this need, we introduce FLARE (Feeder-Level Agent Restoration Evaluation), a physics-grounded benchmark for post-isolation feeder restoration. FLARE con- tains 800 AC-feasible cases across five observation settings and allows agents to gather evidence, evaluate switches, and perform restoration actions under fixed operational limits. We evaluate five instruction-tuned models over 78,750 episodes, including topology, distributed-generation, and loading shifts. Mean normalized regret ranges from 0.082 to 0.148. Although every model has zero median regret, P95 regret ranges from 0.814 to 1.000, revealing an important failure tail. Shadow replay shows that 96.4% of 15,706 guard-rejected actions would have caused a physical violation. FLARE enables reproducible evaluation of language-model based restoration support while emphasizing the need for external safety checks.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Who Pays for Efficient Inference? Confidence-Based Small-to-Large LLM Routing Across Tasks and Languages

Small-to-large language model routing can reduce inference cost by escalating difficult inputs while retaining easier ones on a smaller model. Its success, however, depends on identifying examples that benefit from escalation, and the reliability of confidence across multilingual tasks remains unclear. We present a systematic evaluation of confidence-based routing across three model families, four languages, and three task types, covering 72 model, dataset, language, and scale configurations and 42,288 predictions. We compare global confidence routing with random routing, equal-quota confidence routing, and an oracle upper bound. Confidence identifies beneficial escalations on the Belebele reading comprehension and SIB-200 topic classification datasets, with mean correction-detection AUCs of 0.612 and 0.705. At 50% escalation, it improves over random routing by 1.40--4.67 percentage points on Belebele and 2.54--5.63 points on SIB-200. In contrast, the mean AUC on the MMLU-ProX-Lite knowledge and reasoning dataset is only 0.510, and routing provides no consistent improvement over random selection because small models often remain highly confident while incorrect. Global confidence routing also creates language escalation gaps up to 30.33 percentage points, whereas equal-quota routing removes this disparity with little aggregate accuracy cost. These results show that confidence routing is task-dependent and can allocate computation unevenly across languages. Code is available at https://github.com/sabbir5622r/multilingual-llm-routing

en
arXiv AI Papers

Can the Parts Fool the Test? Counterfactual Pairing Cycles for Relational OOD

Relational out-of-distribution errors are easy to describe and hard to evaluate cleanly. An image may be natural, a caption may be fluent, and all mentioned objects may be common, yet the caption may describe the wrong relation in the image. Many evaluations intended to test this behavior can be solved without checking the pairing at all, because negatives differ in caption style, template, length, object frequency, or image statistics. We propose counterfactual pairing cycles, a blocked evaluation primitive that reuses the same two images and the same two captions on both sides of the comparison, changing only which image is paired with which caption. This makes image-only, text-only, and additive component shortcuts cancel exactly in finite samples. The same contrast also gives a training loss for relational outlier exposure and a diagnostic for bilinear vision-language scores. Across synthetic controls, GQA, and COCO, cycles separate coarse image-caption matching from directional role-binding failures, while also identifying geometric size relations that remain strongly visible in global features. In a shortcut-contaminated COCO outlier-exposure stress test, a model selected by a near-perfect shortcut validation AUROC retains substantial relational signal but remains below cycle training on exact cycles; cycle training improves CycleAcc from 0.882 to 0.927. The main lesson is simple: to test whether a model understands a pairing, the benchmark should keep the parts fixed, change the pairing, and ask only about coupling. The official implementation is available online.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Think More or Read More? A Token-Budget Theory of Reasoning with Shared Context

Reasoning systems increasingly improve answers by incorporating additional context into the model's input, from multi-agent debate, where agents read their peers' responses, to self-refinement, where a model revisits its own drafts. In these systems, communication consumes context as one agent's output becomes another's input. We study the regime where token reading and generation draw on one fixed token window, so every token spent reading is a token that cannot be spent reasoning. We develop a token-budget theory that formalizes this trade-off, modeling accuracy as a function of the reasoning budget remaining after reading and aggregating votes with a Condorcet jury model that permits correlated errors. For multi-agent debate, the theory gives a closed-form prediction for the optimal number of agents. This quantity is estimated from single-agent measurements, allowing the optimal group size to be determined without running debate, and the same accounting extends to a heterogeneous set of different models. We empirically verify our theory and show that, at the predicted group size, our method outperforms strong baselines under the tightest calibration spend, where debate-calibrated rules can afford only one or two questions. Self-refinement obeys the same accounting, with its own draft in place of a peer message. The theory further predicts that communication pays only when the gain in the accuracy ceiling exceeds the reasoning room spent on reading, with this condition tightening as the window shrinks. Across five open models and four reasoning tasks, self-consistency matches or beats deployed debate at 93\% of 980 matched window-and-group-size settings, with the gap being largest under tight windows and nearly disappearing at a loose one, consistent with the theory. Under a shared window, how much room a model has left to think matters more than what it reads.

en
arXiv AI Papers

MGE-PO: Entropy-Aware Credit Assignment for Mathematical Reasoning

GRPO assigns the same group-relative advantage to equally rewarded responses within a question, leaving their generation uncertainty unused. We introduce MGE-PO, centered on four-quadrant (4Q) advantage shaping that combines verified correctness with rollout generation entropy. Correctness determines the sign of an additional correction, while entropy controls its magnitude: lower-entropy successes receive larger bonuses and higher-entropy failures receive larger penalties. An online entropy-based question curriculum supports this credit rule using cached rollout measurements. At the final checkpoint after eight training epochs on Qwen3-8B-Base, adding 4Q across three policy optimization settings yields absolute gains of 3.23-3.69% in six-benchmark macro avg@32 and 4.24-11.06% in macro pass@32. On Qwen2.5-7B-Base, the complete configuration raises four-benchmark macro avg@32 from 41.5% to 45.4%.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Anisotropic Representation Dynamics in Transformers

Small differences between internal representations can shrink or grow as they pass through a Transformer layer, affecting how information is preserved and how sensitive the model is to perturbations. Yet it remains unclear when changes in attention weights can turn a representation difference that would otherwise shrink into one that grows. We develop a Mixture-Gated Theory of Anisotropic Representation Dynamics that separates self-attention into value transport, query gating, and key gating. Our analysis reveals how the geometry of attended representations constrains gating and how interactions between these mechanisms can reverse contraction induced by value transport. We formalize this phenomenon as gating-induced regime switching, where a representation difference contracts under fixed attention routing but expands under full attention. We derive a necessary and sufficient spectral criterion that certifies the existence or absence of switching and identifies switching directions without exhaustive search. Beyond existence, our theory characterizes maximum relative switching strength, certifies the severity of contraction that gating can overcome, and determines the largest dimension of a subspace in which every nonzero direction switches. Experiments across four Transformer architectures validate these predictions through analytical and finite-forward comparisons, revealing distinct and joint query--key gating mechanisms and nontrivial switching subspaces. Our results provide a mechanistic and spectral understanding of how attention routing can alter local representation dynamics.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Response-Informed Value Estimation for Cost-Aware Multi-Turn LLM Routing

Multi-turn LLM routing selects a model at every turn before its response is available, yet task success is revealed only when the interaction ends, leaving each intermediate choice without a label of its own. Logged trajectories, however, retain the response each call produced, which exposes what each turn required and how well the chosen model served it, evidence that outcomes alone hide. We introduce RIVET (Response-Informed Value Estimation for Turn-Level Routing), which exploits this post-call evidence during training while keeping routing strictly pre-call at deployment. RIVET jointly trains two value estimators over a shared state-model representation: a deployable Routing Value Estimator that scores candidate models from pre-call information, and a training-only Response-Informed Value Estimator that additionally observes the realized response. Conditioning on the response turns response-induced return variation from residual noise into an observed covariate, and we show that this reduces the leading asymptotic estimation error of the shared representation. On the MINT benchmark, RIVET solves more held-out tasks than the strongest multi-turn baseline while using 74.7% less total call cost.

en
arXiv AI Papers

MultiAgent-OPD: End-to-End Training of Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems with On-Policy Distillation

In a hierarchical multi-agent system, a Leader assigns tasks and subagents carry them out. Jointly training the Leader and the subagents is difficult because a final answer gives only indirect feedback to the subagents. An LLM judge can score the performance of the subagents, but these scores depend on the judge's own assessment of the quality of subagents' responses. We present MultiAgent-OPD, which combines on-policy distillation with reinforcement learning to jointly train a shared-parameter Leader-Searcher-Answerer team end to end. We first train a Teacher in a Searcher-Answerer workflow using answer correctness. During team training, the frozen Teacher scores student-generated search and summary tokens to provide local process supervision for the Searchers, while the Leader learns from team success and the Answerer from candidate correctness. Across seven datasets, the trained system reaches 38.68% macro avg@4, exceeding Prompted Critic by 4.06 percentage points and C-MAS + RL, the trained cascaded multiagent system, by 2.61 percentage points. The team also solves more questions within four attempts.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Characterising and Analysing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Techniques

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) across many application domains has increased the need for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to reduce hallucinations and improve LLM performance. Thus far, several RAG techniques with impressive features and capabilities have been proposed in the literature, making it a herculean task to select the most appropriate RAG techniques for specific problem scenarios. Thus, we propose a conceptual framework comprising main dimensions and sub-dimensions for characterising (defining "what it is") and analysing (defining "how well it does") existing RAG techniques. The conceptual framework was developed through a qualitative analysis of the attributes of RAG techniques reported in the literature. It can serve as a pre-empirical filtering mechanism for researchers and practitioners in selecting the highest-fit RAG candidates that meet specific user and task requirements before empirical benchmarking of RAG techniques, which can be computationally and financially expensive.

en
arXiv AI Papers

ReLaDrift: Recurrent Language Generation via Drifting for Test-Time Scaling

Drifting Models generate a sample with a single function evaluation, making them attractive for fast parallel language generation, but their one-step formulation does not support iterative refinement. We propose Recurrent Language Generation via Drifting (ReLaDrift), which uses a shared Drifting Model to generate an initial draft from noise and iteratively refine it in a continuous latent space. We train this recurrence by sampling the number of rounds and applying the drifting loss only at the final round, stopping gradients through preceding rounds so that only one round requires backpropagation. Unlike the one-step Drifting Model, whose accuracy does not improve when iterated, ReLaDrift enables a trade-off between test-time computation and generation quality, as diffusion and flow language models do. On Sudoku Hard and GSM8K, it achieves competitive or superior performance compared with these iterative-generation approaches across a range of inference budgets. Our code is available at https://github.com/Yuki-Ots/ReLaDrift

en
arXiv AI Papers

Process Reward Modeling with Reliability- and Conservatism-Aware Bayesian Belief

Process Reward Models (PRMs) play a central role in test-time scaling for large language model (LLM) reasoning. However, PRMs may provide inaccurate process rewards for test-time scaling, which we identify as arising from two sources of uncertainty: (1) PRM uncertainty that arises from insufficient supervision data and imperfect PRM training; and (2) policy uncertainty that results from the mismatch between the policy to collect supervision data and the policy for test-time scaling, leading to systematic reward overestimation. Previous studies fail to jointly consider both uncertainties. To bridge this gap, we propose BayesianPRM, which treats the process reward as a random variable within a reward hypothesis space and maintains a Bayesian belief over it. Since exact Bayesian inference over the continuous hypothesis space is generally intractable, we discretize the reward hypothesis space with a reward ensemble and introduce two complementary belief updates, each targeting one source of uncertainty: (1) to address PRM uncertainty, we introduce reliability-aware belief updating that measures how well each ensemble member explains the supervision data and updates the belief with an amortized belief network optimized by the evidence lower bound (ELBO); and (2) to tackle policy uncertainty, we propose conservatism-aware belief calibration which further reweights the belief toward lower rewards to suppress overestimation. These two updates yield a reliability- and conservatism-aware Bayesian belief, whose expectation determines the process reward. Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks indicate that BayesianPRM consistently yields more accurate process reward estimates while enhancing test-time scaling performance.

en
arXiv AI Papers

qGAMMA: A Framework for Optimal DNN Mapping on Multi-Precision Accelerators

This work describes qGAMMA, a flexible framework for exploring and optimizing the mapping of mixed-precision Deep Neural Network (DNN) models onto general-purpose spatial accelerators that support a range of fixed- and floating-point precisions. qGAMMA navigates the design space using a domain-specific genetic algorithm and an analytical performance model based on hardware synthesis results. The framework identifies the optimal mapping and accelerator configuration that minimizes target metrics. Extensive evaluations across DNN workloads show that qGAMMA offers valuable insights for designing mixed-precision applications, enabling better trade-offs between performance, energy efficiency, and resource utilization.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Not All Test-Time Compute Is Evidence: Model-Specific Bias in LLM Reasoning

Test-time scaling methods implicitly assume that additional computation from the same model provides independent evidence. We show that this assumption fails within a single reasoning model: errors are correlated across repeated samples, across reasoning depth, and in the model's own self-evaluation, so more compute from the same model is not more evidence. We introduce DIA (Disagreement-triggered Independent Arbitration), which treats disagreement between an intermediate-stage and the final-stage prediction as a per-question signal of reasoning instability and resolves it by asking a small panel of heterogeneous models to solve the question independently, without seeing either candidate, and aggregating their answers directly. Across seven benchmarks and two base models, DIA outperforms full chain-of-thought in 12 of 14 settings, including a 7.00% gain on MuSiQue, while activating on only 17\% of examples and using up to 47.2% fewer tokens than a multi-agent baseline. Ablations show that both independent solving and solver heterogeneity are necessary for these gains.

en
arXiv AI Papers

MAS-Bai: Linguistically Informed Adaptive Multi-Agent Translation for Bowen-Script Bai

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain unreliable for extremely low-resource languages whose writing systems conflict with high-resource pretraining priors. We study Bai-Chinese translation in the Bowen script, where Chinese characters are frequently borrowed phonetically rather than semantically, causing severe literal-translation hallucinations. We propose MAS-Bai, a linguistically informed adaptive multi-agent framework for Bowen-script Bai-Chinese translation. MAS-Bai routes each input through either a lightweight retrieval-translation path or a deeper philological path with etymological and syntactic agents, and uses cycle-consistency with a lightweight reverse translator as an inference-time reliability signal. We construct a 6,536-sentence Bai-Chinese corpus and evaluate on a 1,536-sentence test set. MAS-Bai achieves 16.23 BLEU and 62.15 COMET, improving over Standard RAG by 8.11 BLEU and 6.85 COMET. Forward LoRA, expert ablations and controlled routing experiments distinguish the roles of supervised adaptation, Bai-specific expertise and conditional routing. The largest gains occur on Bowen phonetic loans and divergent Bai word order, while human evaluation and reverse-verifier analyses support the automatic results.

en