overfeed.news
Anuncio

SRExpert

Deja de saltar entre 6 herramientas de Kubernetes.

Monitoreo, alertas, seguridad, despliegues Helm y operaciones con IA en una sola plataforma.

Probar 30 días gratis

Fuente

arXiv AI Papers

arxiv.org

6415documentos

Inicia sesión para seguir esta fuente
arXiv AI Papers

SEMA-Auto: Sighted and Efficient Multi-Turn Attack with Autonomy

Existing jailbreak attackers fall into two classes: static planners fix their single- or multi-turn adversarial plans in advance, remaining simple but losing sight of the victim's replies, wasting turns and limiting transferability; interactive generators read each victim reply to generate the next-turn attack but require in-loop evaluators for success signals or hints, incurring substantial costs and inflated performance. Bridging this gap, we propose SEMA-Auto, a sighted and efficient multi-turn attacker with autonomy, interacting with the victim model and terminating the session by itself upon success. To stabilize its behaviors and boost its capabilities, SEMA-Auto is trained in two stages. Synthetic bootstrap tuning installs the notion of attack targets and conforming decisions by fine-tuning the base model with bootstrapped trajectories. Decision-supervised reinforcement learning then optimizes two objectives jointly yet separately, reinforcing the attack with higher jailbreak reward while supervising the decision at each turn against an absolute target. Our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) attack success rates (ASR) across multiple datasets, victims, and judges, outperforming all static and interactive baselines, within almost the fewest turns, demonstrating both effectiveness and efficiency. For example, SEMA-Auto performs a 76.0\% ASR@1 within an average of 3.0 turns against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on AdvBench, while the best static baseline is 54.8\% with fixed 7 turns and the best interactive baseline is 43.8\% in 3.7 turns. Against safety-hardened frontier models, GPT-oss-120B, GPT-5.4, Claude-Haiku-4.5, and GPT-6-Astra, our counter-trained attacker achieves an average 59.6\% ASR@1 on HarmBench, 13.8\% over prior SOTA. Our code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/SEMA

en
arXiv AI Papers

LUCID: Local Understanding of Covariate Importance with Conditional Density Estimation

Computing local-level variable importance (VI) is critical for understanding machine learning models. Local permutation-based VI metrics offer a simple yet powerful approach, measuring how much a model's output changes when perturbing its inputs. However, existing perturbation strategies often ignore feature dependence or account for it only through restricted approximations. Perturbing a feature without fully respecting this dependence can generate unrealistic counterfactuals, thereby evaluating the model in regions unsupported by the observed data distribution. We address this gap by introducing a new model-agnostic local VI metric and estimator, Local Understanding of Covariate Importance with conditional Density estimation (LUCID). LUCID perturbs features of interest using plausible values drawn from the full conditional distribution given the remaining observed features. We establish theoretical connections between LUCID and existing VI measures, and provide an estimator with convergence guarantees and uncertainty quantification. Finally, we demonstrate LUCID's stable performance and practical utility across simulated and real-world examples.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Preference-Guided Cooperation in Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) addresses agent coordination and objective trade-offs simultaneously while optimising overall system performance. Existing work tends to treat multi-agent cooperation and multi-objective optimisation as largely independent components of a learning problem, which amounts to an exorbitant complexity except in trivial cases. We study here whether the structure provided by multiple objectives can itself be exploited to facilitate cooperation, rather than being treated as an additional optimisation challenge. We formulate MOMARL at both the team and individual levels and introduce objective-wise counterfactual credit assignment to evaluate each agent's contribution across the team objectives. We propose Meta-Gradient Informed Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MIRL), with static (MIRL-S) and dynamic (MIRL-D) variants. By incorporating meta-gradient information, MIRL enables agents to learn how to prioritise objectives individually while collectively optimising the system-level objective, allowing the multi-objective structure to directly guide cooperation. Experiments on a multi-objective multiple particle environment show that our methods improve Pareto-front quality over baselines, with the dynamic variant achieving the strongest performance.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Using Routed Ensembles and Trajectory Attribution

Multi-objective reinforcement learning is a fundamental problem for modern AI, with applications spanning post-training, reasoning models, and robotic control. A central challenge is to learn policies that balance competing objectives, such as helpfulness versus honesty in safety and alignment, or speed versus energy in robotics. The optimal policy can vary sharply with objective-weighting combinations, and the extent of this variation depends crucially on the degree of conflict among objectives, making per-preference policy learning sample-inefficient. In this paper, we introduce objective-conflict coefficients and derive near-optimal regret bounds for online settings using this measure, thereby quantifying the impact of misalignment on learning efficiency. Then, we design routed ensemble policy learning, an algorithm that maintains a small set of basis policies and dynamically routes trajectories to the policy with the highest potential reward. Finally, we consider trajectory selection as another approach to mitigate objective conflict, and design a kernel surrogate trajectory attribution algorithm that estimates how feedback signals from a set of trajectories influence policy learning on other trajectories. The kernel can capture nonlinear interactions such as synergy and antagonism between trajectories. We evaluate our approach across diverse environments and benchmarks: routed ensembles improve average performance by 4.3% over baselines for online environments from Meta-World and MO-Gymnasium, and kernel surrogate attribution improves correlation with leave-one-out analysis over existing baselines by 50%. When applied to trajectory selection, kernel-based attribution yields a 27% improvement in reward over baseline attribution methods.

en
arXiv AI Papers

TRACE: Memory-Efficient Time Series Class-Incremental Learning via Temporal-Spectral Reconstruction

Web-connected sensing applications continuously generate multivariate time series with evolving behavioral categories, making Time Series Class-Incremental Learning (TSCIL) essential for adapting to new classes without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. However, preserving diverse and evolving class distributions under strict privacy and memory constraints remains a fundamental challenge. Existing approaches often face a trade-off between retaining sufficient historical knowledge for accurate recognition and minimizing the memory required for continual adaptation. To address these limitations, we propose TRACE, a memory-efficient, replay-free framework that preserves class-specific knowledge through generative modeling rather than sample rehearsal. TRACE employs a compact, frozen temporal-spectral representation and lightweight class-specific autoencoders to capture complex intra-class variations. By independently preserving each class model, TRACE avoids recursive generation and catastrophic forgetting, while enabling direct classification through reconstruction-based scoring without retaining historical samples or large statistical matrices. Extensive experiments across five TSCIL benchmarks demonstrate that TRACE achieves competitive classification accuracy while reducing mean retained memory by approximately 98.26% compared with TS-ACL, the strongest evaluated analytical baseline, and achieving an approximately 33.43% relative improvement in accuracy on GrabMyo.

en
arXiv AI Papers

The Watchtower Imperative: Lifespan-Calibrated Evaluation for Frontier AI

The gap between AI capability deployment and safety assurance is structural and cannot be closed through internal evaluations alone. Analyzing documented harms (2017-2026) across the human lifespan reveals that disparate incidents --- from voice assistants endangering children to AI companions implicated in adolescent suicide and automated care denials for the elderly --- reflect a single failure: evaluating systems against an implicit adult user model. We introduce five developmental moderators structured into a Lifespan Vulnerability Matrix across six life stages. The matrix reveals a nonmonotonic risk distribution: vulnerability peaks at both ends of the lifespan, governance coverage is asymmetrical, and authority to convert model errors into real-world impact is scrutinized least. We then propose a set of lifespan design principles generalizing existing child-protective instruments, and an institution-agnostic, three-tier external evaluation framework --- comprising automated simulation, expert red teaming, and post-deployment monitoring --- indexed directly to matrix risk cells.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Can JEV Support Clinical Trial Criteria Assessment?

Clinical trial prescreening requires distinguishing unmet conditions from insufficient evidence in patient records. Given patient records, criterion questions, and predefined answer options, we retrospectively compared JEV, a non-generative decision model returning native option probabilities, with schema-constrained Qwen Flash across 2,048 test patient-condition pairs from TrialGPT and question-answer datasets derived from MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, all evaluated under strict Zero Data Retention (ZDR) policies to ensure clinical data privacy. Both models assessed conditions individually or in batches sharing the same patient context, with performance measured against reference labels. In batch mode, JEV and Qwen achieved similar macro-F1 scores on TrialGPT (0.652 vs. 0.660) and MIMIC-IV (0.807 vs. 0.814), whereas JEV substantially outperformed Qwen on MIMIC-III (0.768 vs. 0.534; Δ = +0.234, 95% CI: 0.187-0.281). This advantage largely reflected higher recall for conditions labeled as having insufficient information (56.3% vs. 9.9%). Across all three datasets, JEV also had lower observed median job latency (1.18-1.40 vs. 2.80-8.90 s) and 53%-74% lower estimated cost per condition. These findings position JEV as an initial assessment component that provides criterion-level judgments and flags potential information gaps for review. JEV's observed errors in interpreting clinical evidence underscore the need to verify its outputs against patient records before they inform eligibility decisions.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Quantifying the failure of symmetry learning in linear diffusion models due to initialization and finite-sample effects

Data distributions often possess one or more symmetries: for example, all orientations of any specific dog are included in the distribution of all possible dog pictures. Despite the omnipresence of such symmetries, modern generative modeling approaches may fail to incorporate or learn them, which can lead to lower sample efficiency and poorer generalization. To what extent do diffusion models fail to learn data distribution symmetries, and what sources of symmetry breaking are most responsible? Here, we answer this question in the theoretically tractable setting of linear diffusion models. We show that of three potential sources of symmetry breaking---a non-symmetric initial weight matrix, a noisy learning target, and finite-sample noise---target noise produces the most robust symmetry breaking, since it persists even in the sample-rich regime. Using local laws from random matrix theory, we derive formulas for average symmetry error in fairly general cases involving symmetry within a subspace and show that smaller symmetries are harder to learn.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Audit Where Hacks Pay: Budgeted Strong-Verifier Audits Against Reward Hacking in GRPO

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards trains on cheap checks, such as unit tests, that a policy can learn to game, while a stronger check is too expensive to run on every rollout. We study how to spend a limited strong-verifier budget in GRPO, separating which weakly passing rollouts to audit from what reward a caught hack receives. At a fixed policy state with centered advantages, the expected update depends on a design only through each rollout's marginal audit probability and correction; reflecting a caught hack's reward about the failure reward negates the advantages of an all-hack group; and auditing whole groups with the fewest weak passes first (low-pass budgeted audits, LB) minimizes the advantage mass left on hacks among pass-count designs with a fixed correction when a label's value falls with the pass count. We tested this analysis in actual LLM training: from each run's starting state, the sign of this mass on a frozen panel predicted whether hacking would be suppressed in 33 of 39 runs, including 13 of 16 preregistered ones. In LeetCode (Wong et al., 2026) and Countdown-Code (Khalifa et al., 2026), LB drives hacking to near zero, while random audits with the same penalty and budget do not and use more labels. We also find that the randomness of the update affects training: in Countdown-Code, two unbiased corrections, per-item reward-level IPW and a group-level advantage correction, bring hacking down too but end 6.1-11.8 and 8.0-11.5 points lower in held-out accuracy than LB at the same budget. A full audit, which the group-level correction reproduces in expectation, stays within about two points of LB in three seeds, while LB uses 28% of its labels, and allocating the same correction by pass count recovers most of the loss (one seed). Training outcomes thus depend not only on the expected update but also on the randomness of its estimate.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Quantitative Generalization Bounds for Multi-Layer Transformers: A Few Long Strings can Beat Many Short Ones

Transformer-based language models exhibit an astonishing capacity to generalize to longer and more difficult problem instances than those seen in training. However, theoretical understanding of this phenomenon still lags behind. Unlike most machine learning models, the generalisation abilities of transformers inherently require considering two axes. On one hand, one must examine in-distribution statistical generalisation, which concerns the ability of a model to broaden a function from training samples to novel samples of the same distribution. On the other hand, given the sequential nature of language data, one must also consider length generalisation, which reflects whether a model trained on inputs of a given length can extrapolate to longer ones.These two notions have mostly been studied separately, leaving open how they interact. In this work, we give a joint treatment of both axes for fixed-precision transformers. We give generalisation guarantees in terms of the parameter sizes of the involved models, as well as the quantization space and the alphabet size that supply the sequences. Finally, we illustrate how the requirements in the sample count and training length trade off. In particular, we find that increasing training length can be exponentially more efficient than increasing the sample size. Experiments support predictions of the theory.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Detecting bus delays and service anomalies in Niterói with autoencoder latent feature representations

Bus riders judge service by two failures: single trips that run late, and days on which the whole system misbehaves. We ask whether one unsupervised representation of raw GPS telemetry can serve both diagnoses on the NetMob 2026 Niterói bus dataset. An autoencoder compresses each trip into a 64-dimensional latent vector; the frozen encoder feeds supervised delay classifiers, and the reconstruction error serves as an anomaly score. Two findings are negative. First, the latent representation does not improve delay detection: gradient boosting on per-trip summary features reaches 0.846 0.013 ROC-AUC against 0.838 0.016 for the best latent setup, and the gap becomes significant once the preprocessing filters are relaxed. Second, two of the three external checks of the anomaly score were circular. Retraining without rainfall removes the rain association (5.4\% against 5.0\% flagged, p = 0.84) and an apparent citywide disruption on 23 March. What survives is a day-level signal stable across three autoencoders (Spearman ρ0.96), driven mostly by day type, with degraded-telemetry days still separable within weekday and weekend strata. The alarm threshold limits detection more than the score does: a pooled percentile cut flags 5.7\% of trips on the worst degraded day, while re-scaling within each bus line flags 29.3\%. The delay model rests almost entirely on one feature, no latent dimension is individually interpretable, and 22 chronic line-directions carry half of all delayed trips.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Triage: Skip, Skim, or Refine Attention Tiles in Video Diffusion Transformers

Attention over tens of thousands of visual tokens dominates the inference of video diffusion transformers (DiTs). Existing methods reduce this cost through sparsity, low precision, or both, but use a single precision for all kept tiles. We observe that the output error introduced by approximation varies widely across tiles. Many tiles can be skipped with little error, others must be computed but gain little beyond low precision, and a few retain substantial error even at low precision. We present Triage, a training-free attention method that assigns each tile one of three approximation tiers: skipping it by replacing it with its block means, skimming it in NVFP4, or refining it with NVFP4 residual correction. A lightweight router predicts each tile's error under each tier from block statistics and moves a tile to a more accurate tier only when the predicted error reduction justifies the extra compute, with a single price setting this trade-off. A fused kernel executes all three tiers in a single pass on the FP4 tensor cores of RTX Blackwell GPUs. Across Wan2.2, HunyuanVideo, and LTX-2.5, Triage accelerates end-to-end generation by up to 2.32x over dense FlashAttention, and in each of five settings it runs faster than every baseline while reaching 0.3-3.0 dB higher PSNR than the highest-PSNR baseline.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Explainable Multimodal AI Approach to Reduce Unnecessary Breast Biopsies

Recently, there has been rise in multimodal vision-language models for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), yet their application in breast diagnosis, particularly for predicting biopsy outcomes remains limited. This study presents a multimodal vision-language approach, incorporating Grad-CAM as an Explainable AI (XAI) technique, to predict benign tumors in patients recommended for biopsy, especially those classified as BI-RADS 4 and 5. A novel multimodal framework was devel- oped using Vision Transformer (ViT) for imaging feature extraction and DeBERTa-V3-Large for textual embeddings. The model was trained and evaluated on a comprehensive in-house dataset comprising 1,632 patients, each with four mammography views and a corresponding radiology report. The features of both modalities were extracted independently and fused by late fusion before classification. Grad-CAM was used to generate visual explanations highlighting key regions influencing model predictions. The proposed model demonstrated high sensitivity 90%, 95%, 99%, and 100% with corresponding specificities of 40%, 36%, 18%, and 11%, respectively. The best AUC achieved was 0.72 by multimodal approach on the test set, outperforming the image only (0.66) and text-only (0.68) baselines. The proposed multimodal architecture, enhanced with Grad-CAM, demonstrates a strong potential to identify benign tumors among high-risk patients, offering interpretable insights and thereby helping reduce unnecessary biopsies, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs.

en
arXiv AI Papers

From Self-Confidence to Statistical Accuracy: Scaling Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation with Direct and LLM-Assisted Auditing

For large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs), model-reported self-confidence is often miscalibrated, yet it may still be useful for efficient evaluation. At the same time, LLM-as-a-judge offers a scalable alternative to direct human auditing, but its practical benefit depends on calibration quality and inference cost. This paper develops a unified statistical framework for both evaluation routes under alternative sampling strategies. For direct auditing, confidence-stratified sampling is used to recover population accuracy from partially verified outputs without requiring calibrated confidence. Finite-sample uncertainty is characterized, and the analysis shows how highly uneven confidence strata affect audit efficiency and label allocation. For judge-assisted evaluation, the judge is modeled through sensitivity and false-positive rate, yielding an error-corrected estimator with calibration uncertainty. The two routes are then compared through human-label and total-cost efficiency boundaries. Experiments on MMLU-Pro and MMMU-Pro show that miscalibrated self-confidence can still support statistically valid stratified auditing. Under highly imbalanced confidence distributions, proportional allocation substantially reduces estimation error relative to equal-per-stratum allocation. For judge-assisted evaluation, only a small subset of target--verifier pairs satisfies the idealized human-label efficiency condition, and automated inference costs can further limit potential savings. These findings clarify the statistical and economic conditions under which confidence-guided auditing and automated verification are useful.

en
arXiv AI Papers

MiRL: Error-Targeted Reinforcement Learning for Correcting Terminal Agent Misbehaviors

Error-targeted learning gives a legible way to improve a model: identify specific weaknesses of the model, train the model to fix these weaknesses, and check whether the weaknesses are fixed. We study how to apply error-targeted learning to terminal agents, which solve long-horizon tasks specified in natural language by interacting with a command shell. Existing error-targeted methods are designed for single-turn tasks, and existing analyses of agent failures are used to evaluate and debug agents rather than to train them. We propose Misbehavior-driven RL (MiRL), which first profiles the errors of a policy to find generalizable misbehaviors: kinds of wrong steps that recur across many environments. MiRL then trains the policy with RL, starting rollouts at the steps where these misbehaviors occur and rewarding a rollout only if it passes the tests and avoids the misbehavior. On Qwen3.5-4B, eight misbehaviors account for 52.1% of wrong steps. After training with MiRL, the policy repeats the measured misbehaviors 43% to 57% less often on average on unseen prefixes. MiRL outperforms TMax-4B on Terminal-Bench Lite (51.8% vs. 47.4%) and matches it on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (21.3% vs. 20.6%), while using 35% of its rollouts. These results show that error-targeted learning can be applied to realistic, long-horizon terminal tasks.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Towards a Unified Framework of Optimal Input-Side Dimensional Configuration for Deep CTR Prediction

Deep click-through rate (CTR) prediction has achieved substantial success through increasingly expressive feature interaction architectures. However, predictive performance also depends on how input-side information is configured before interaction modeling. Existing studies have shown that selecting informative samples, features, or embedding units can improve prediction accuracy. Nevertheless, they primarily optimize these selection mechanisms independently along a single input-side dimension, overlooking their shared basic form and the inherent dependencies across input levels, thereby limiting the effectiveness of input-side dimensional configuration. To address this issue, we propose OptIDC, a unified framework for Optimal Input-side Dimensional Configuration in deep CTR prediction. OptIDC jointly learns sample, feature, and embedding-unit level configurations within a unified framework by integrating their corresponding selection mechanisms. To explicitly coordinate selection decisions across different levels, OptIDC further introduces a selection-weighted Optimal Transport mechanism that aligns coarse- and fine-grained selections via transport over finite measures, thereby alleviating cross-level selection conflicts while preserving the semantics of each input level. Moreover, OptIDC is model-agnostic and can be seamlessly integrated into existing CTR models. Extensive experiments on four real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that OptIDC consistently achieves higher AUC than existing input-side selection methods, validating the effectiveness of unified input-side dimensional configuration.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Not One Belief: Answer Payloads, Persistence, and Dissociated Confidence Signals in Conversational Question Answering

Conversational QA systems should fix errors when users push back and signal which answers to trust. We split each follow-up into its speech act (re-ask, agree, or challenge) and its payload (an answer string, correct or not), and measure four confidence signals on the same transcripts: verbalized confidence, length-normalized likelihood, a frozen hidden-state probe, and P(True). Answers change when the user supplies an answer string and almost never under the speech act alone: in every retained full-size cell, the correct answer converts at least four times as many wrong answers as re-asking or agreement. The four signals disagree. On Qwen2.5-7B the frozen probe rises with answer persistence rather than truth; this holds on held-out questions, with Llama-3-8B (cleaned answers) as support, but not on four other models. Among 81 Qwen2.5-7B errors that survive one re-ask, re-asking, a fresh chat, or abstain repair almost none, while a gold answer repairs 75-95%. In two preregistered replications, every repair rate without an answer string stays below 0.15; a larger post-hoc rerun excludes 0.15 except for the empty elicit. With BM25 TriviaQA evidence, sentences that contain the answer repair 67-76% of persistent errors versus at most 12% when they do not. An end-to-end contain-gate cuts harm on TriviaQA, but a deployable gate that does not know the gold answer repairs few errors.

en
arXiv AI Papers

GNN-VIEW: Visual Inspection and Explanation of Graph-based Earth-System Models

Machine learning Earth-system models are becoming increasingly important, and so is their development. Graph-based models, one of the most prominent approaches, allow developers to constrain the learning process before training via graph connectivity. Yet, developing these models remains challenging: the graph is built algorithmically with little intuition about the final result beyond static plotting, which requires extra work and is often not detailed enough. Even after successful training, how the model arrives at forecasts remains obscure. We present GNN-VIEW, an interactive browser-based tool that supports the development of such systems. GNN-VIEW exposes the graph's information pathways, allowing model developers to debug the graph structure before training. After training, GNN-VIEW uses attribution-based explainability to reveal which input features are used by the trained model for a given forecast. This helps developers understand why a model fails. We showcase the usefulness of GNN-VIEW in the construction stage of a graph for an ocean forecasting model, and in explaining poorly predicted precipitation of a trained weather forecasting model during Hurricane Laura.

en
arXiv AI Papers

EvoRouter: Cost-Efficient Multi-Agent Routing via Insight-Guided On-Policy Distillation

Serving web queries at scale with multi-agent systems requires jointly configuring large language models, collaboration modes, agent counts, interaction rounds, and skills. However, the resulting configuration space grows combinatorially, while sparse execution rewards provide limited fine-grained supervision for interdependent planning decisions. We propose EvoRouter, a self-evolving multi-agent routing framework driven by insight-guided on-policy distillation. A dedicated expert periodically synthesizes performance-cost feedback from configuration trajectories across tasks into reusable conditional routing insights about capability requirements, returns from resource scaling, and interactions among configuration choices. A privileged teacher combines these evolving insights with current execution feedback to provide dense token-level supervision for the router's own planning trajectories through on-policy distillation. Cost-aware reinforcement learning jointly optimizes task performance and computational cost. Together, these training signals internalize execution insights into the routing policy. The updated policy generates new trajectories that support subsequent insight extraction, forming an execution-driven self-improvement loop. We evaluate EvoRouter on 19 in-domain datasets spanning five domains and two out-of-domain benchmarks. EvoRouter achieves an average in-domain accuracy of 68.69%, outperforming the strongest routing baseline by 7.23 percentage points while reducing inference compute cost by 50.95%. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/CenYangtze/EvoRouter.

en
arXiv AI Papers

TrySee: Modular Perception-Enhanced VLM Grounding for Closed-Loop Robot Task Planning in Specialized Domains

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in high-level reasoning and task planning for robots. However, specialized domains remain a challenge for VLMs' image interpretation and grounding abilities. We introduce TrySee, a modular closed-loop robot task planning pipeline integrating general-purpose VLM reasoning with domain-specific perception and established robotics components. The system consists of an inherently reactive cyclic planning pipeline, augmented with domain-specific modular vision preprocessing, to provide online grounding. Finally, a dynamic preprocessing selection mechanism contributes to the scalability of the pipeline. The system requires neither VLM fine-tuning nor end-to-end demonstrations and adapts through replaceable perception modules and motion planning. The approach is evaluated on planning tasks across 5 widely different domains, including a real-world robot disassembly task. The field tests in a brownfield environment demonstrate the approach's practicality in integrating VLM planning into specialized robotic systems with limited domain-specific training data.

en