overfeed.news
Anuncio

NexTalk

Automatiza la primera respuesta. Mantén el toque humano.

Chat en vivo con agentes de IA en tu modelo y tu clave de API, con traspaso a tu equipo.

Empezar gratis

Fuente

arXiv AI Papers

arxiv.org

6415documentos

Inicia sesión para seguir esta fuente
arXiv AI Papers

State-Aware Activation Recomputation with Replay Contracts and Selective Preservation

Activation recomputation saves accelerator memory by replaying forward segments during the backward pass, but replay is only correct if it sees the state the original forward pass saw. Mutable buffers, aliased bytes and random-generator state can change in between, so re-executing unchanged code can differentiate a different computation. We make this state explicit. A versioned replay contract specifies what replay must restore, and a joint planner chooses, per segment, between activation retention, whole-buffer snapshots and selective-region preservation, charging each option its measured memory and recovery cost. Independent derivative and byte-level checks validate the contract, and a Torch/JAX cohort retains all 5,900 execution records, including matches, rejections and divergences. On frozen sparse-write H100 workloads, each measured over fifty fresh processes, joint planning reduces paired step time by 18.16% against a correctly costed eager/whole planner at a 44 GiB budget (approximate 97.5% ratio interval [.8172,.8195]). At 32 GiB, where the eager/whole planner has no feasible static policy, joint planning is 4.98% faster than fixed regions at 29.94 rather than 26.20 GiB. A complete CIFAR-100 dense-queue application runs seven methods for 100 encoder and 25 probe epochs at six training seeds, with byte-identical test scores within each seed. There, joint planning uses 22.41% more allocated memory than whole snapshots, with a process-time geometric-mean ratio of 1.0080 (seed range [.9845,1.0191]). Together, the results map where selective preservation pays off: sparse writes with large activations benefit, while in the dense-queue workload whole snapshots use less allocated memory.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Guarded Compression of Adam Optimizer State with Shared-Gradient Bounds

Adam keeps two FP32 moments per parameter, twice the bytes of the FP32 weights, yet compressing them is risky: the update divides by the square root of the second moment, so small reconstruction errors can change the restored computation substantially. We study guarded moment compression, in which a coordinate's decoded moments are accepted only if they reproduce the native FP32 Adam update to within a tolerance τ, in units of the learning rate, for every gradient in a clipped domain; all other coordinates are stored exactly. The natural certificate, which ranges each update separately over gradient intervals, fails: on one million trained OPT-125M coordinates it escapes 98.9% of coordinates and the payload grows to 126.6% of raw FP32. Our key observation is that both updates consume the same gradient and parameter. Bounding their difference directly, with FP32 rounding-error allowances and a fixed mixed linear-logarithmic gradient partition, cuts escapes to 0.53% and the payload to 28.3% at τ=0.01. Across 120 complete-checkpoint restores of OPT-125M and ResNet-18, with four trained seeds and three training fractions per model, guarded 8-bit log codes shrink moment payloads by 69.5% and 71.9% relative to FP32, 40.8% and 45.4% relative to equally guarded BF16, and 29.3% and 37.6% relative to equally guarded blockwise 8-bit, and every restored first update stays within tolerance. Encoding and restoration together take 2.3-2.6as long as guarded BF16 but less time than guarded blockwise 8-bit. Searching both moment codes jointly saves under 0.001% more bytes at 6% more codec time, so per-moment rounding suffices. The guarantee covers the first restored update under a pinned Torch operation model; we measure subsequent training empirically.

en
arXiv AI Papers

TVP: TV is Almost All You Need for Speculative Decoding

Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference with a drafter whose proposed tokens are verified by the target model in parallel. Under lossless speculative sampling, a draft token is accepted with probability one minus the total variation (TV) distance between the target and draft distributions, yet drafters are often trained with cross-entropy (CE) or KL. We first show that under matched and well-tuned training, TV matches or surpasses several published draft-training objectives when fine-tuning, and a fixed TV and KL mixture does the same when training from scratch. We identify two remaining problems, TV's vanishing gradients on undercovered tokens and the prefix products that starve later positions in acceptance-length objectives. To address both, we derive TVP, a loss family based on expected acceptance length, whose power parameter interpolates between coverage and acceptance oriented objectives. Annealing the power from zero to one gives the highest or tied-highest acceptance length across three drafter architectures and three target models, including longer drafts and block verification. TVP improves acceptance length over CE by 9.8% when fine-tuning, and over the public DFlash2 training recipes by 6.2 to 12.9%.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Dataset Mismatch Matters in Group Relative Policy Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards

Recently, reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) is practically very important, where the leading approach is group relative policy optimization (GRPO) that typically faces a trade-off between rollout efficiency and downstream performance. To improve efficiency while preserving performance, existing selective rollout methods mainly exploit only source-side training dynamics to optimize the discrete distribution over source prompts. However, in practice, the source training dataset is rarely identically distributed to the target test dataset. When such a mismatch exists, due to legal or privacy constraints, it is usually not acceptable to share target prompts themselves with the RLVR trainer. Nevertheless, it is still possible for the target data owner to provide limited aggregated feedback from a small held-out target set without revealing target prompts or rollout traces. In this paper, we propose learning-to-reweight rollout (L2RR) that explicitly incorporates target-side performance feedback into GRPO. Specifically, L2RR learns a discrete sampling distribution over source prompts by optimizing a bi-level objective that maximizes accuracy on a held-out target dataset, while simultaneously penalizing rollouts that provide little incremental learning information. Empirical studies on six math reasoning benchmarks and three model scales show that L2RR improves target-domain performance and increases rollout efficiency.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Conic Certification of Transformer Attention

Attention is the computational core of large language models, yet the verifiers that bound how far an attention head's output can move under input perturbations give no guarantee on how loose their bounds are. A weak certificate therefore cannot be told apart from a fragile model. We develop a conic programming theory of attention certification that supplies this guarantee. We prove that the difficulty lies not in the softmax but in the bilinear interaction of a varying query with the keys. This interaction makes certification NP-hard over boxes and inapproximable once the attention logits can move by a constant amount. A fixed query or listed token substitutions, by contrast, make the exact worst case efficiently computable. An exponential cone moment relaxation then certifies a head with an error bounded quadratically in the perturbation radius by computable quantities, an order that cannot be improved. We also show that relaxations that treat a network one operation at a time, linear bound propagation among them, pay on second-order terms a sum of per-operation maxima instead of one coupled maximum. Computational results on GPT-2 indicate that the theory carries over to a trained model. Against exact worst cases with the query fixed, the certificate attains the predicted second-order accuracy. It is tighter than linear bound propagation on every head, and the looseness of bound propagation tracks the predicted per-operation excess.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Evolving Scientific Intelligence: From Fragmented Evidence to Distributed Experimental Loops

Scientific discovery advances when evidence from different investigations is brought into contact. Yet paper-centric communication leaves experimental results fragmented, delayed, or unreported, creating a "scientific memory wall" between growing computational capabilities and the evidence accessible to AI systems. We envision a different dynamic: in a network of intelligent laboratories, a failed or overlooked experiment in one domain could trigger a hypothesis in another, whose testing generates evidence that stimulates further investigations. Such chains of information collision and empirical validation could transform isolated discovery loops into a cumulative scientific process. We propose Evolving Scientific Intelligence (ESI), an architectural blueprint for enabling these evidence-driven chain reactions. ESI preserves experimental records in shared, computable scientific memory, where evidence from different domains can be recombined into testable hypotheses. It jointly selects candidates and evaluation methods according to scientific value, reliability, and cost, then coordinates physical tests across distributed experimental nodes. Their feedback revises hypotheses and evaluators, while slower meta-control reassesses research objectives and decision criteria to guard against self-reinforcing errors and misguided optimization. We call for an Information Manhattan Project to build the infrastructure for scientific intelligence that evolves through experimentally grounded chains of discovery.

en
arXiv AI Papers

From Apparent Search Gains to Selection Failures: Auditing Test-Time Inference in Structured Workflow Planning

Test-time search can improve structured planning, but when methods differ in prompts, post-processing, and selection, it is unclear what an observed gain should be attributed to. We study this question on DisasterBench, where models compose typed multi-tool workflows, by decomposing inference into three observable stages: whether a correct workflow is discovered, whether it survives structural validation, and whether it is finally selected. Comparing independent sampling, a nominal tree-search configuration, and multi-operator search under controlled inference budgets on two model families, we find that (i) the nominal tree-search configuration realizes non-adaptive complete-workflow sampling, and independent sampling with its expansion prompt reproduces its candidate discovery without constructing a tree; (ii) structural validation never removes the last correct workflow in our evaluated candidate pools, whereas majority voting leaves a discovered correct workflow unselected on 10-19% of tasks per pool, with an audit confirming substantive tool-choice or information-flow errors in 57 of 60 examined cases; and (iii) a tool-specification-aware verifier recovers some of these losses but overturns more correct decisions than it fixes. Our results motivate auditing realized rather than nominal inference pipelines, and reporting discovery, validity, and selection separately.

en
arXiv AI Papers

The First-Order Value of Free Covariates in Budgeted Risk Monitoring

A deployed model sees its inputs for free, but checking whether its risk has risen requires costly labels. We study how to spend a label budget so that a risk increase is detected quickly while false alarms stay controlled, including under input shifts that keep the risk below a safety threshold τ. Let A be the false-alarm control scale and h(r)=kl(r,τ) the Bernoulli KL divergence between the changed risk r and τ. At label rate b=c/A, we prove that every rule that chooses requests from its own label history has worst-case (Lorden) delay at least (1/h(r)+1/c)A to first order: besides collecting evidence, it must wait for its next label. The bound needs only a label budget on one finite stretch of safe source data and false-alarm control over an initial window; a bound on the average time to false alarm does not suffice. When a harmful change also shifts the inputs, a rule that lets the inputs trigger labeling attains delay A/h(r) to first order on a fixed Gaussian model, so free covariates save at least 1/b rounds. A hybrid rule adds a label-history fallback for risk changes that leave the inputs unchanged. Synthetic experiments and two ACS tasks, with strengthened label-only baselines, show the predicted pattern. The covariate trigger has a cost: because its budget is calibrated on the source, a benign input shift can make it request nearly every label.

en
arXiv AI Papers

WAR-CRAFT: Refining Web API Recommendations through Requirement Auditing

Web API recommenders return a set of APIs for a mashup request but do not check it against provider documentation, the main public evidence of an API's capabilities. The set can therefore contain unsupported or redundant APIs and miss requested capabilities. Filling every apparent gap does not fix this, because a gap may already be served, may not need its own API, or may have no documented provider. We study post-recommendation refinement, which revises a frozen recommender's output using only the request, the catalog, and provider documentation. We propose WAR-CRAFT, which treats refinement as three decisions. An LLM removes unsupported or subsumed APIs by judging candidates jointly, then audits the remaining set against a requirement checklist derived from the request. For each uncovered requirement, a fine-tuned catalog-constrained Resolver proposes a catalog API or abstains, and an independent documentation check admits only supported proposals. On ProgrammableWeb with 7 heterogeneous upstream recommenders, WAR-CRAFT raises mean SetF1 from 0.558 to 0.644, above the strongest of 5 refinement baselines (62.5%), and roughly halves functional redundancy (0.127 to 0.065) without changing mean functional coverage. Gains range from +2.2 points on generative recommenders to +18.2 on fixed-cutoff rankers. At matched set sizes, WAR-CRAFT still outperforms truncating the upstream output, so the gain is not explained by set-size calibration alone. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZsXu-enrico/WAR-CRAFT.

en
arXiv AI Papers

TabAbax: A Tabular Foundation Model Technical Report

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) enable in-context prediction on unseen tabular datasets without task-specific training. Mechanistic work has shown that increasing the depth of the ICL Transformer yields weak gains, leaving the main headroom for gains in the synthetic pretraining prior and column-row encoder upstream of the ICL backbone. We introduce TabAbax, a TFM built on TabICLv2 that focuses all modifications on these two upstream components. On the prior side, we further improve the quality and complexity of the synthetic pretraining prior. On the encoder side, a two-pass column-row stack strengthens cross-feature interactions before row compression, using learned Fourier scalar encoding from TabFM and Causilo. Evaluations on BeyondArena and TabArena show strong regression-centric gains: TabAbax reaches 1,238 Elo on the 142-dataset BeyondArena suite (10th of 41 evaluated methods), 1,676 Elo on TabArena's overall 51-dataset suite (11th of 99 methods, +115 over TabICLv2), and 2,024 Elo on TabArena's regression benchmark (7th of 99 methods, +336 over TabICLv2, +21 over TabFM). A prior-only ablation confirms the attribution: the improved prior alone yields +228 Elo for regression, demonstrating that prior quality is the dominant knob for improving regression performance.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Can agents reliably design therapeutic antibodies?

Recent work has demonstrated agents driving protein design workflows, either through orchestration of specialized tools or direct manipulation of sequences. Yet the fidelity with which agents follow protein design instructions and the factors contributing to their effectiveness remain understudied. We examine agentic antibody design under two settings: when explicit molecular-editing instructions are provided and when agents receive only previously-scored sequences and are prompted to propose improvements. We call the first task-guided and the second black-box design. For the task-guided setting, we curate ten expert-validated affinity-improvement tasks and show that LLM judges closely reproduce programmatic evaluations of instruction following. We then study two augmentations: access to antibody-relevant tools and to previously scored design history. Tools improve instruction following (IF) and sequence space exploration while reducing optimization performance, whereas design history reduces IF but improves optimization performance at the expense of exploration. Finally, we combine taskguided and black-box design within an in silico optimization loop and show that our agentic optimizer performs comparably to an established Bayesian optimization baseline.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Distinguishing among reasoning levels of GPT 5.5 Pro via a grammar lens benchmark

Does the level of test-time processing effort affect a language model's computational capability? A formal grammar-lens benchmark method, derived from the theory of computation, generates novel data at specified levels, each successively more computationally powerful than the levels below. Using this data, we tested GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.5-Pro-Medium, -High, and -XHigh, showing incrementally increased acceptance of test data: 16, 40, 43, and 52\%, respectively, illustrating the benchmark's ability to discern fine-grained differences among models' added test-time reasoning levels. Additionally, as test-time compute effort increases, model responses diverge from human responses to the same data. This increasing disagreement may turn out to be broadly characteristic of more capable language models, introducing the potential of a general capability-versus-alignment conflict.

en
arXiv AI Papers

From Weeks to Hours: Fast and Principled SFT Data Generation for Reasoning LLMs

Reasoning-oriented post-training enables large language models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks via multi-step inference. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on high-quality reasoning traces is a particularly efficient approach, but its effectiveness depends critically on careful data curation. Existing pipelines rely on a costly generate-then-filter paradigm: large pools of long reasoning traces are produced by multiple teacher models and subsequently filtered for difficulty and diversity using additional LLMs, often requiring weeks of computation. In this work, we propose SFTProbe, a fundamentally different approach that bypasses this pipeline by directly predicting the quality of reasoning data. We show that a brief LoRA-based adaptation, combined with evaluating loss on only 5% of each reasoning trace, suffices to estimate both difficulty and diversity. SFTProbe is grounded in a geometric view of post-training, where pretrained LLMs lie in a low-rank, anisotropic loss basin. By probing this basin via low-rank perturbations, we construct compact loss signatures whose clustering captures diversity, while loss at curvature inflection points provides a robust proxy for difficulty. We also provide a simple criterion for teacher selection. Empirically, our approach reduces data curation time from weeks to hours while maintaining or improving performance. Remarkably, on mathematical reasoning, 5k generated examples match the highly filtered 89k-example in OpenThoughts-Math dataset, and 7.5k generated examples outperforms it by 2.5% in accuracy. We further introduce a high-quality physics reasoning dataset, and use it to train a model that outperforms an IPhO 2025 silver-medal-winning model. The code and the dataset are released at https://bigml-cs-ucla.github.io/SFTProbe-page/.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Governing Equations of Human Sleep Macro-Structure:Symbolic Discovery from 1,106 Nights

Human sleep is organized into a small number of cycles per night: deep sleep dominates early cycles, REM lengthens toward morning, and light sleep clusters at cycle boundaries. These regularities have long been described qualitatively but never distilled into closed-form laws from large-scale data. A total of 1,106 nights (Sleep-EDF 153 + SHHS 953) are segmented into REM-anchored cycles, and four cycle-indexed statistics follow simple closed-form equations: cycle length declines nearly linearly (R^2=0.996), REM duration follows an inverted U (R^2=0.873), deep-sleep (N3) run length decays exponentially (R^2=0.987) with a time constant of 2.94 cycles, consistent with the homeostatic Process S of the two-process model, and light-sleep (N1) run length follows a U shape (R^2=0.956), confirming a "long-short-long" pattern across the night. The laws are reproduced by per-night differentiable fitting (142/142 and 773/773 nights converge), by unconstrained symbolic regression (PySR), and by a 500-night generative synthesizer built from them. Their robustness is established against the two main methodological threats: bootstrap CIs computed by resampling whole nights (1,000 replications) exclude zero for every shape term, and a five-level scan of the REM-merge segmentation threshold preserves every qualitative form. These appear to be the first closed-form laws governing the macro-structure of sleep, distilled and tested across an age-mixed sample (healthy young adults and community-based older adults).

en
arXiv AI Papers

BitLLM: Efficient Low-Bit, Conversion-Hiding LLM Decoding on Mobile GPUs

The rapid scaling of large language models (LLMs) has unlocked remarkable capabilities across various domains. However, deploying LLMs on mobile devices remains challenging because of their high computational and memory requirements. Low-bit quantization (e.g., 4-bit weights, 8-bit activations) can reduce model size while preserving accuracy, but its practical efficacy on mobile GPUs has been limited so far. In this paper, we identify that the performance gap stems primarily from frequent data type conversions between quantized and floating-point values, and dynamic and inefficient memory access patterns caused by the growing Key-Value (KV) cache during autoregressive decoding. We introduce BitLLM, a mobile inference engine that addresses type conversion overhead and suboptimal memory accesses in quantized LLMs. Our approach features an adaptive layout and packing strategy for the KV cache that ensures efficient memory access throughout LLM decoding. This is coupled with an integer-native execution pipeline that defers and overlaps type conversion outside the compute hot path, keeping the critical MatMul stages in the integer domain. Implemented on off-the-shelf mobile GPUs, BitLLM outperforms leading engines, i.e., LLAMA.CPP, MNN-LLM, LiteRT-LM, and MLC-LLM, achieving average speedups of 1.78, 1.73, 1.58, and 1.47, respectively, across various models and quantization levels. Under long-context generation, BitLLM reduces average energy consumption (per token) by up to 88.9%.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Low-Margin Branch Points in Deterministic LLM Deliberatio

Deterministic multi-agent LLM deliberation can exactly re- play a fixed transcript, yet exact replay alone does not test local resistance to controlled internal interventions. Because each response becomes context for later agents, a changed greedy token can redirect a transcript-mediated execution. We present a white-box audit of this local failure mode in a five-agent committee under greedy decoding. We prospectively select low- and high-margin token positions, require exact no-op re- play, inject norm-relative residual displacements, and measure first transcript divergence within ten generated tokens. Low- margin positions are more branch-sensitive than high-margin controls, while matched margin-reducing gradient directions branch substantially more often than margin-increasing con- trols. We then continue selected realized branches through the committee to distinguish textual persistence from preference and final-decision changes. The contribution is a controlled audit for local branch susceptibility in this specified protocol, not an estimate of deployment frequency, decision correct- ness, or a phenomenon unique to multi-agent systems.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Skill++: Towards Lifelong Agents via Routing-Aware Skill Refinement

Large language model (LLM) agents extend their capabilities with skills, each with a name, a description, and a body. Under progressive disclosure, an LLM router selects skills by name and description alone and loads only the selected bodies. Skill libraries grow continually as users and agents add new skills. Because the router relies on this metadata, a similar new skill can displace an earlier one, breaking previously correct routing even though the earlier skill and the router are unchanged. This routing interference is aggravated for public skills, whose descriptions may not match their bodies. We formulate the problem as lifelong skill routing, a class-incremental continual learning problem. A solution must keep earlier skills selectable without suppressing new ones. Existing approaches fall short, since continually retraining the router risks catastrophic forgetting and rewriting methods either ignore similar skills or require per-skill feedback. We therefore propose Skill++, which rewrites only the name and description of each incoming skill, without router training or labeled data. The new description states what the body supports, how the skill differs from its closest predecessor, and what related work it excludes. As a library grows to 731 skills over ten sessions, Skill++ selects all required skills for 76.3% of queries, versus 36.4% under the original metadata. Across three benchmarks and five LLM routers, it outperforms all compared approaches, and its gains carry over to the Codex CLI agent harness.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Faster Imitation by Re-timing Demonstrations Within the Controller Limit

Imitation policies inherit the operator's pace, and re-timing the demonstrations to run faster works only until success collapses at two to three times demonstration speed. Recent methods attribute that collapse to distribution shift and answer it with finer rules for which segments may be sped up; we show it has a mechanical cause that segment selection cannot address. A low-level controller realises only a bounded displacement per control period, so merging consecutive commands produces sums outside that bound: training pairs that promise a transition the plant cannot deliver. The share of such pairs in the re-timed data, which we call the exceed share, tracks where the retrained policy collapses. The rule that follows has a single parameter: merge greedily while the sum stays realisable. Every command is then realisable by construction, the demonstrated geometry is preserved, and the speed-up lands only where the demonstrator left slack. On four simulated robomimic tasks, 200 held-out seeds per cell, a merge cap of two is at or above the frozen policy's success on all four, by 14 points on Square, and shortens the successful episodes. At matched tempo, uniform re-timing loses 9 and 16 points on Can and ToolHang, is within noise on the other two, and reaches zero on the hardest at 2x. Placement also matters: no shuffled, entropy-guided or speed-conditioned alternative beats the rule on three of the four tasks, by margins the exceed share alone does not explain; on the fourth, at a tempo the task absorbs, every placement lands in the same band. The same principle carries to a simulated humanoid whole-body tracker: re-timing 429 reference motions within its velocity envelope succeeds on 71% of clips at 2.3x, against 51% for uniform time scaling at 2x.

en
arXiv AI Papers

Dual-Axis Policy Entailment: A Benchmark for Policy-Change Reasoning

Whether a policy shifts domains and, by extension, continues, broadens, narrows, or reverses previous policy is of paramount importance to the study of public policy. We propose Dual-Axis Policy Entailment (DAPE), which evaluates an ordered pair of policy directives on both dimensions at once: a binary judgment determines whether the two directives govern the same policy domain, and a five-way judgment determines whether the later directive continues, broadens, narrows, or reverses the earlier policy, or governs a different domain altogether. Read together, the two judgments form one five-category label, our primary metric. The two-axis design captures two central dimensions of policy change without conflating errors on either dimension into a generic "irrelevant" label, and it makes annotation more rigorous: a coder cannot dismiss a difficult pair as domain-irrelevant without an explicit, checkable decision. We introduce an expert-annotated benchmark of 1,000 ordered directive pairs drawn from a large corpus of Chinese government policy, together with an annotation-calibration protocol (an adjudication packet with pre/post agreement measurement) that we contribute as a methodological artifact. Fourteen open-weight models and four frontier API flagships fail the task zero-shot: even the best frontier flagship's chance-corrected agreement with expert labels is far below the human ceiling (Cohen's κ0.29 vs. 0.53). A fine-tuned open-weight model (LoRA SFT of Qwen3-14B, five-fold cross-validation) closes this gap, reaching the coder-mutual human ceiling (κ= 0.524 vs. 0.527). Finally, we apply our method to China's AI policy (1980-2024) and map the direction of policy change across eras.

en
arXiv AI Papers

When Does Spatial Cooperation Help? Contamination Regimes in Decentralized Online Spectrum Anomaly Learning

Learning-based spectrum monitors adapt online to benign propagation changes, but persistent rogue transmissions can gradually become incorporated into the learned background. Spatially distributed receivers provide additional evidence for detecting such anomalies, while decentralized model mixing can also spread contamination to receivers with clean measurements. We study this tradeoff using a decentralized online learner with sample gating and model sharing. We show that, without defenses, contamination propagation is governed by the occupancy rate and is independent of cross-receiver correlation. In contrast, the benefit of spatial fusion depends strongly on correlation and the detector operating point, so cooperation can either improve or degrade detection. We also show that fragmented transmissions can evade gating based on temporally smoothed statistics. Combining smoothed and per-sample gating substantially improves robustness to such intermittent contamination.

en