Buscar
16.258
See how Legora uses OpenAI models, ChatGPT, and Codex to accelerate legal workflows, expand contract analysis, and free lawyers to focus on higher-value work.
New image-text-to-text model. Tags: minicpm_ocr, minicpm-ocr, ocr, document-parsing, multimodal, vision-language, table-recognition, formula-recognition
New image-to-image model. Tags: lora, image-editing, moss-image, comfyui, image-to-image, en, zh, base_model:OpenMOSS-Team/MOSS-Image-SFT
See what shipped on Runpod in Q3 2026, from Batch Inference and Global Volumes to Cluster Expansion, REST API v2 and Organizations for Runpod Enterprise..
Test-time training (TTT) layers replace the linear fast-weight memory of modern recurrent architectures with a small neural network trained online by gradient descent. This nonlinear memory is more expressive than the linear memories of Gated DeltaNet and Mamba-2, but is difficult to parallelize: existing implementations such as TTT-MLP rely on sequential, block-wise weight updates that run several times slower than chunkwise-parallel linear recurrences. Moreover, their block-wise execution only approximates the token-by-token online recurrence, whereas linear recurrences admit an exact chunkwise-parallel evaluation. We introduce ParaTTT (PTTT), an algorithm for parallelizing arbitrarily deep nonlinear memories by iteratively refining estimates of the inner-loop gradient trajectory. Starting from a guess of the hidden-layer gradients, each refinement consists of three chunkwise-parallel passes: a forward pass that evaluates the resulting feature trajectory, an exact gated-delta-rule pass that computes the readout trajectory and its feature gradients, and a backward pass that propagates these gradients into a new estimate. The exact online gradient descent recurrence is a fixed point of the iteration, while decoding requires no refinement iterations. We prove geometric convergence for a two-layer variant under sufficient contraction conditions. In practice, two iterations suffice. With two refinement steps at 4K context, PTTT evaluates the inner-loop trajectory 32faster than TTT-MLP with the block approximation at matched error, while the full 340M model trains 4.9faster. Models trained at 340M and 1.3B parameters match or exceed Gated DeltaNet and Mamba-2 and remain competitive with same-size Transformers on language-modeling perplexity and zero-shot accuracy, with better recall than the linear recurrences.
Offline reinforcement learning seeks to learn decision policies from previously collected data, but deployment environments may differ from the domains in which the data were collected, and logged variables may omit confounders that affected both historical actions and outcomes. We study offline policy learning under the joint challenges of domain discrepancy and unmeasured confounding, where multiple heterogeneous source datasets provide complementary information about a target domain. We develop a causally adjusted transportability framework combining transportability theory with instrumental variables, negative controls, and proxies to identify target-domain causal quantities. For confounded contextual bandits, identification reduces to systems of bridge-function integral equations, enabling minimax estimation from finite samples. Confidence sets for the identified quantities are then used for pessimistic policy optimization, yielding CAT-CCB. We extend the framework to episodic confounded Markov decision processes, where complementary sources identify target reward and transition mechanisms under structural and completeness conditions. Under Gaussian dynamics and linear function approximation, this yields CAT-CMDP. We establish high-probability finite-sample suboptimality guarantees that quantify the effects of approximation, estimation, source-to-target shift, offline coverage, and sample size. For bounded finite-dimensional linear classes, the contextual-bandit guarantee recovers the standard {O}(N^{-1/2}) rate. Numerical experiments support the effectiveness of the framework for learning target-domain policies from heterogeneous confounded data. Together, the results provide a principled approach when no single source dataset suffices for causal identification and policy optimization.
Music audio generation spans instrumental clips, full songs with vocals, edits of existing recordings, and systems that play alongside a musician in real time. This monograph explains the methods behind these systems for readers familiar with neural-network training who are new to music generation. It introduces neural audio codecs and autoencoders, autoregressive and masked token models, diffusion and flow matching, sampling acceleration, and preference optimization in a shared notation. Worked examples connect training objectives and sampling procedures to published systems. The application sections relate the musical requirements of instrumental generation, songs, editing, and live performance to model design. Comparison tables record representations, methods, inputs, tasks, and release information documented in papers and official sources. Symbolic composition, speech, and sound effects are included where they connect to music audio. We explain how to interpret automatic metrics and learned judges, design and report listening tests, and assess evidence about data provenance, memorization, attribution, and output detection. Selected legal decisions and disputes illustrate the implications for training and release. The reviewed systems combine established generative paradigms with new representations, planning stages, and post-training procedures. Differences in data, scale, and evaluation limit what cross-system comparisons can establish about the sources of reported gains.
Large language models hold promise for delivering safe, scientifically grounded, and personalized exercise guidance at scale, yet the sports-and-health domain still lacks curated training corpora and rigorous evaluation benchmarks. Keepace.ai is a domain-specialized LLM built on Qwen3.5-27B through post-training, currently optimized for Chinese-language exercise guidance across three tasks: workout plan generation, sports-and-health knowledge QA, and personal sports data analysis. In internal rubric-based evaluations designed with domain experts, Keepace.ai outperforms its base model and larger general-purpose baselines, with the most pronounced improvements in exercise safety, boundary compliance, structured output completeness, and scientific accuracy. This report summarizes the current design, data pipeline, safety-first evaluation framework, and evaluation results of Keepace.ai.
Retrosynthesis planning seeks synthesis routes from purchasable starting materials to a target molecule. Search over predicted reactions can connect a target to available materials, yet an infeasible reaction can invalidate the resulting route. Evaluating route quality only after search has finished cannot correct errors made during search. We introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), incorporating reaction verification as a decision action in AND/OR search. Verification results are represented as binary verdicts; queries are scheduled from the search structure, and acquired verdicts exclude reactions or adjust search priorities. We define verified solvability as the fraction of targets for which a complete route accepted stepwise by the verifier is found. On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback. Further controlled experiments show that earlier verification and immediate prioritization of accepted reactions each improve route discovery, yet combining them performs worse than either change alone. We therefore propose early pruning and delayed guidance: rejected reactions are pruned immediately, while accepted reactions gain search priority when processed as part of a complete candidate route. In a separate comparison with the verification scheduling rule fixed, this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.
Existing code reveals past implementation decisions but rarely explains the reasoning behind them. When coding agents implement new features or modify existing functionality, past decisions may conflict with new task instructions. This raises a fundamental question for agentic software evolution: when multiple implementations satisfy the same functional requirements, how do coding agents decide whether to follow existing code or new task instructions? We investigate this question through bidirectional, controlled experiments in purpose-built repositories, followed by validation in real-world open-source repositories. Our approach isolates three competing sources of guidance: (1) agents' default preferences, (2) repository precedents, and (3) explicit task instructions. We conduct 5,625 trials across four coding agents and six implementation pairs, with validation in four open-source repositories spanning three programming languages. We find that agents share the same default implementation choices, yet overwhelmingly follow repository precedent when it conflicts with those defaults (359/360 trials). Crucially, not all precedents carry equal influence: three supporting local files yield 96% adoption, compared with only 4% for sibling-resource files, and changing file placement alone can shift adoption from 0% to 100% at a fixed example count. When new task intent conflicts with existing code, written priority rules achieve substantially higher success than code examples alone (59/60 versus 38/60 joint successes for two agents on two implementation pairs). The effectiveness of explicit rules also extends to open-source repositories, where a harness-loaded rule raises joint success from 0/120 to 117/120. These findings motivate design-decision traceability that preserves not only implementation choices but also the rationale and priorities that should guide future changes.
We study adversarial linear bandits with strong corruption, in which an adaptive adversary chooses the reward vectors and a strong adversary corrupts each observed reward after seeing the learner's action, subject to a known total corruption budget C. Strong corruption breaks the importance-weighted reward estimates used by adversarial bandit algorithms: by corrupting only the rounds in which a rarely sampled action is drawn, the adversary amplifies each unit of corruption by the inverse of its sampling probability. The best known bound for this problem, O({d^3T} + dC) by Liu et al. (2024), is a factor {d} above the corruption-free rate in its leading term, and whether O(d{T} + dC) regret is achievable was left open. We propose CRW-FTRL, which runs follow-the-regularized-leader with a radius-weighted entropy regularizer and estimates rewards with a normalized kernel estimator whose sensitivity to corruption is governed by per-action radii instead of inverse sampling probabilities. The radii are nondecreasing and are chosen jointly with the sampling distribution through a monotone log-determinant barrier problem, so that a negative linear term in the regularizer cancels both the corruption bias and the estimation error of every comparator. For K actions in {R}^d, CRW-FTRL achieves O({dTK} + dC) regret with high probability against an adaptive adversary, which matches the best known corruption-free rate and the Ω(dC) lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Applied to a discretization of a general compact action set, it yields O(d{T} + dC) regret, which settles the statistical rate of corrupted adversarial linear bandits under strong corruption.
Current datasets for text-to-video generation are largely limited to short clips depicting a single event or coarse-grained captions. As a result, they provide limited supervision for modeling long-take temporal dependencies, often leading to temporally inconsistent generations when describing multiple events. In this paper, we introduce MEV, a multi-event video dataset designed for long-take video generation. MEV provides high-quality real-world videos where subjects can perform a sequence of distinct, non-overlapping events, featuring precise temporal boundaries and fine-grained procedural annotations. This event-centric discretization reduces confounding factors and enables models to support temporally localized conditioning and build long-take videos from atomic event units. Furthermore, we introduce a comprehensive annotation pipeline that segments videos into temporally grounded events, and generates structured captions at both the global level and the event level. In addition, under an event-centric evaluation protocol, we conduct multi-event generation experiments by fine-tuning on MEV with temporally grounded event conditioning, leading to improved long-take event transitions and more coherent content. We believe this work provides a publicly available resource for multi-event fine-tuning and event-centric evaluation, together with practical insights into learning from temporally structured video-text data.
Large language models are increasingly used for financial guidance, yet little is known about whether their advice changes across social identities in Global South contexts. We introduce the Indian Financial Automated Advice Bias (IFAAB) benchmark, a counterfactual audit dataset of 31,734 GPT-4o-generated financial-advice responses for synthetic Indian personas varying by gender, caste, education, employment, residence, age, and district. Holding the underlying request fixed, we evaluate disparities in LLM-implied wealth, income, savings, projected gains, textual similarity, advice topics, and qualitative bias judgments. In the gender-only audit, male-labelled profiles receive 60.1\% higher initial total resources and 46.8\% higher post-advice total resources than comparable female-labelled profiles; in the caste-augmented audit, the post-advice total-resource gap remains 49.4\%. Adding district information reduces the aggregate post-advice total-resource gender gap to 7.9\%, revealing strong geographic conditioning. Standalone caste comparisons also show systematic stratification: relative to General-category profiles, OBC, SC, and ST profiles receive significantly lower post-advice total resources, respectively. Textual audits show low semantic similarity between paired gendered responses, with an average TF--IDF cosine similarity score of 0.44. Qualitative analysis shows that women are more often steered toward cautious saving, community support, and basic financial literacy, while men receive more growth-oriented advice involving investment, entrepreneurship, and asset accumulation. IFAAB provides a reusable benchmark for evaluating fairness, suitability, and consumer-protection risks in LLM-mediated financial advice, and highlights the need for locally grounded, intersectional evaluation of AI systems in high-stakes economic domains.
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) typically mitigates distribution shift by imposing divergence constraints on the action distributions of the learned and behavior policies. However, this paradigm cannot ensure the underlying dynamic consistency structure: even minor action deviations can lead to drastically different transitions, inadvertently driving the agent away from the offline dataset. To address this, we explore policy constraints through their induced state-consequence distributions rather than relying on pure action-distribution matching. Nevertheless, directly enforcing such consequence-aware constraints is computationally intractable without access to the true underlying dynamics model. To bypass this issue, we propose Structural Behavior Regularization (StBR), which replaces the intractable objective with a closed-form latent divergence. Structuring this latent space to reflect transition dynamics renders the latent divergence a theoretically bounded surrogate for the true consequence-distribution divergence. By regularizing the learned policy with this latent divergence, StBR adaptively tightens the behavior constraint in dynamics-sensitive regions, effectively preventing deviations outside the offline dataset. Empirically, we demonstrate that StBR achieves superior performance across diverse offline RL benchmarks.
Language models increasingly create 3D content through code, with practical workflows often relying on editing existing programs rather than regenerating them, for speed and precise control. Such edits require understanding what a program builds and foreseeing how a change reshapes it, yet prior benchmarks mostly evaluate generation or simple edits against a reference. In this paper, we introduce 3DCodeEdit, a benchmark of 2,592 instruction-guided editing tasks over 108 Blender programs that construct objects entirely in code. Its edits range from parameter to structural changes, style redesign, and scene composition, and are judged from renders against human-reviewed checklists. Across 17 models, the average success rate is only 37%, and even the strongest models complete fewer than 60% of structural and style edits. As models become more capable, their failures shift to geometric foresight, where the code runs but builds the wrong shape. We therefore study whether multi-turn feedback can compensate for this missing foresight. Feedback from a separate reviewer model that describes how the renders differ from the request helps most, more than maximum reasoning effort or an agent harness, and can let a 27B model surpass the single-shot rate of a 2.8T-parameter model.
Fully Sharded Data Parallelism (FSDP2) maintains parameters and gradients as per-parameter tensors, whereas its collective path operates on flat, rank-major buffers. Converting between these layouts copies all-gather outputs into parameter storage and packs gradients into full-group fp32 buffers. Layout conversion alone accounts for 6.4% of step time in Llama-3.1 70B training at 8K tokens per GPU. Communication kernels impose a second cost: a default NCCL reduce-scatter can slow a concurrent GEMM that would otherwise complete in a single wave by 69%. We present TIDE, a set of zero-copy collectives built on public NCCL 2.31+ APIs. TIDE preserves FSDP2's per-parameter storage and compute kernels while folding layout placement into collective addressing. TIDE-AG delivers shards directly to parameter storage using NVSwitch multicast and paced recursive-doubling RDMA, with no SMs used for transport or placement. TIDE-RS consumes per-parameter bf16 gradients directly and reduces them into fp32 shards (a mixed-precision mode that NCCL does not provide) using copy engines and short-lived thread blocks (CTAs) for node-local accumulation and NVSwitch for cross-node reduction. A two-phase pipeline separates gradient reads from network progress; Slot-Reuse optionally stages gradients in vacated all-gather slots. On 64 GPUs, TIDE reduces step time by up to 27.1% relative to Stock FSDP2 and 6.0% relative to FSDP2+SymmMem across Llama-3.1 70B, Wan2.2, and Qwen3-30B-A3B. It reduces reduce-scatter SM time by factors of 12.5-14.5 and cuts interference with concurrent compute by up to an order of magnitude. Its reduce-scatter buffer remains nearly constant from 16 to 64 GPUs at a fixed per-GPU output size, and its peak memory is up to 4.7 GiB below FSDP2+SymmMem's and, with Slot-Reuse on Wan2.2, below Stock FSDP2's.
