overfeed.news
Anuncio

Agendator

Reservas online gratis para tu barbería o salón.

Página de reservas, agenda y recordatorios por email. Sin cookies ni anuncios para tus clientes.

Crear mi página gratis

Empresa

Google

637documentos

66últimos 7 días

arXiv AI Papers

What Drives AI Citations? Content, Retrieval and Model Knowledge in Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Generative search engines such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity now decide which Web pages users see as sources, and a growing industry of generative engine optimization advises publishers on how to earn these citations. We study what shapes citation in two 90-day collections of answers to commercial questions in contrasting markets: 158,099 answers with 468,037 citations. Comparing pages of the same website, content matters in one way: pages whose title and paragraphs match the questions people ask are cited more, whereas FAQ blocks, structured data, summary boxes and page speed appear effective only across websites. Page properties nevertheless explain little of the variation between pages of a website. Replaying the questions through the engines' APIs shows why. Every page ChatGPT cites is one its own search retrieved, and which pages that search retrieves, for sub-queries the model rewrites on every answer and that rarely coincide with Google's or Bing's results, explains far more of the variation than page properties (32% against 2.8%). Content acts mainly through this step, by matching the engine's queries in meaning. The model's own knowledge shapes it too: ChatGPT writes brands it knows into its searches, prefers websites it knows, and names brands without any supporting page, and controlled experiments show that brand names reorder its rankings of products with identical facts. Pages are thus cited when searched; brands are also named when remembered. The findings replicate in a market of small B2B vendors. We release data and code.

en
arXiv AI Papers

PlacePulse: Learning Transferable Place Representations from Structural Geographic Data

Geospatial machine learning often depends on task-specific feature engineering over large collections of sociodemographic, business, and environmental variables. Geospatial foundation models offer reusable representations of place, but leading approaches typically encode dynamic signals, such as mobility and search activity, or visual signals from satellite imagery. Few models represent the static structural composition of places (who lives and works there, which businesses operate there, and which risks they face) as transferable embeddings at fine spatial resolution. We introduce PlacePulse, a structural geospatial foundation model that compresses 572 attributes, expanded to 2,288 inputs through H3 neighborhood aggregates, into 256-dimensional unit-norm embeddings for 1,055,537 H3 resolution-7 cells in the United States. We also introduce a reusable two-axis benchmark that separates intrinsic representation quality from downstream predictive utility across multiple targets and spatial supports. Intrinsically, the embeddings reconstruct standardized inputs with mean R^2 = 0.853, use 251 of 256 approximately decorrelated dimensions, and show strong spatial organization, with Moran's I = 0.93 on the leading principal component and autocorrelation persisting beyond the input radius. Extrinsically, across 74 held-out targets from 12 external sources and four spatial supports, PlacePulse outperforms a dimensionality-matched feature-selection baseline on targets unrelated to the training inputs and is competitive with Google's Population Dynamics Foundation Model, leading on health, economic, election, economic-mobility and social-vulnerability outcomes, with relative strengths that vary by domain. These findings position structural composition as a distinct and complementary modality for geospatial foundation models, not simply a fallback where behavioral or imagery data are unavailable.

en
arXiv AI Papers

From Reactive Containment to Proactive Assurance: Lessons from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Agent Security Incidents

In 2026, cybersecurity evaluations involving OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google agents reached real systems outside their authorized test scope. The paths were different. OpenAI agents exploited research infrastructure, coordinated across runs, and compromised parts of Hugging Face's production environment. Anthropic reported cases in which a misconfigured third-party environment exposed real systems to agents pursuing simulated cyber tasks. In a separately reported evaluation, Google's Gemini accessed three real organizations through an unintended internet route; Google stated that the model stopped in all three instances. Taken together, the cases show why an evaluation cannot rely on an assumed boundary. That boundary must be verified while the agent is operating. This comparative instrumental case study develops a Proactive Agent Security Assurance Cycle (PASAC) and a five-layer Boundary Assurance Stack. The framework combines risk-tiered task design, executable scope contracts, pre-run validation, least-capability access, independent egress enforcement, credential restrictions, cross-run monitoring, automatic stop conditions, and evidence-based reauthorization. A leading-indicator model, nine design propositions, and seven falsifiable hypotheses turn these lessons into a testable research program. Because the public Gemini record is limited to attributed statements and journalism, its detailed causal mechanism remains provisional. The central conclusion is straightforward: proactive agent security requires continuous assurance across the full execution system, not confidence in any single sandbox or safeguard.

en
arXiv AI Papers

FastBench: Can Streaming VLMs Perceive High-Dynamic Real-World Streams?

Streaming Video Large Language Models (VLMs) enable continuous video understanding, yet existing benchmarks focus on low-dynamic scenarios. Under bounded context budgets, models must balance temporal history, spatial resolution, and temporal granularity; sparse sampling at 1--2 FPS misses fast events. We introduce FastBench to evaluate high-dynamic perception in real-world video streams. Its trajectory-grounded pipeline combines QA generation from high-FPS clips, filtering of questions answerable at 2 FPS, answer verification using SAM3 and CoTracker3 trajectories, and three rounds of human inspection. FastBench contains 306 QA pairs across eight domains, six capabilities, and forward, instant, and backward temporal scopes, with human-annotated evidence intervals. We also present ProactiveFrame, a training-free baseline that adjusts incoming frame rates through text tokens. A dual-tier sliding window retains recent high-FPS observations while downsampling older ones into sparse history. Experiments reveal substantial limitations: the strongest model, Gemini-3.5-Flash, scores only 50.7%. Denser sampling improves Qwen3-VL-8B from 32.9% at 2 FPS to 44.6% at 24 FPS, but gains saturate as history is compressed. ProactiveFrame outperforms sparse uniform sampling by 5.4 and 1.5 percentage points, yet remains well below oracle-guided focusing, showing that current VLMs struggle to determine from the stream alone when finer temporal perception is needed. FastBench provides a testbed for high-dynamic streaming video understanding. Code and data: https://github.com/Ashone3/FastBench.

en